Pass rate, every year
12,238 tests across 7 model years, 2000–2006.
−5.8 pts vs the national average
Pass rate, every year
12,238 tests across 7 model years, 2000–2006.
−5.8 pts vs the national average
Best year to buy
2002 75.7%
The strongest of the 7 years on record. See the 2002 page →
Worst year to buy
2006 71.3%
4.4 points below the 2002 peak. See the 2006 page →
The Rover 25 MOT pass rate is 75.2%, −5.8 percentage points below the UK average. That is 12,238 DVSA MOT tests recorded between 2000 and 2006. This page lists the most common Rover 25 MOT failures by category, names the best and worst model years, and finishes with a pre-MOT checklist you can run at home.
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Rover 25 MOT pass rates does in your corner of the country.
The Rover 25 passed on its first attempt in 68.8%, and its overall record sits −5.8 percentage points below the national average for all cars. These figures come from every recorded DVSA MOT test for the Rover 25 in the 2023–2025 data: 12,238 tests across 7 model years (2000–2006). A test still carries exactly one pass or fail verdict.
| Measure | This model |
|---|---|
| Tests analysed | 12,238 |
| Overall pass rate | 75.2% |
| Passed on first attempt | 68.8% |
| Average mileage at test | 67,021 mi |
| Model years covered | 2000–2006 (7 years) |
| Versus UK national average | −5.8 pts below |
Figures are computed from every recorded DVSA test for this model in the 2023–2025 data.
Every MOT failure a tester records belongs to one inspection section of the DVSA manual. For the Rover 25, the Body, chassis, structure section leads the record — the breakdown below shows where the recorded failures cluster, then the exact strings behind the three biggest sections.
| Inspection section | Share of failures |
|---|---|
| Body, chassis, structure | 45% |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 28% |
| Visibility | 11% |
| Suspension | 9% |
| Brakes | 5% |
| Steering | 1% |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 1% |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 0% |
Shares are over the Rover 25's recorded defect strings, merged across its year pages.
Around 45% of the recorded Rover 25 failures fall in the Body, chassis, structure section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated" (8.9%), "Joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt" (6.8%), "Exhaust system has a major leak of exhaust gases" (2.6%) among the Rover 25's body, chassis, structure faults.
Around 28% of the recorded Rover 25 failures fall in the Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources" (5.2%), "Battery(ies) insecure but not likely to fall from carrier" (3.0%), "Position lamp not working" (1.2%) among the Rover 25's lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment faults.
Around 11% of the recorded Rover 25 failures fall in the Visibility section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view" (2.6%), "Wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively" (1.6%), "Wipers blade defective" (0.3%) among the Rover 25's visibility faults.
The descriptions below are the exact DVSA failure strings testers recorded most often for the Rover 25, each with how many of the model's 12,238 tests it was noted on.
The strongest Rover 25 model year on record is 2002 (75.7% across 2,211 tests), and the weakest is 2006 (71.3%). The gap between them is 4.4 points. Years with fewer than 50 recorded tests are excluded, so these are the years with enough MOT history to mean something.
| Year | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 25 | 216 | 71.3% |
| 2005 25 | 1,438 | 74.8% |
| 2004 25 | 2,164 | 75.0% |
| 2003 25 | 2,450 | 75.7% |
| 2002 25 | 2,211 | 75.7% |
| 2001 25 | 2,314 | 74.8% |
| 2000 25 | 1,445 | 75.6% |
Newest model year first. Only years with at least 50 recorded tests are listed.
These checks follow this Rover 25's own most-recorded failure strings, starting with what a tester is most likely to flag on a Rover 25.
the lights — “registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
corrosion — “component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength”
Look under the sills, around the jacking points and where the suspension mounts meet the body. Flaking, holed or crumbly metal fails; a brown stain on sound metal does not.
the battery — “battery(ies) insecure”
Check the battery is secure and its terminals are clean and tight — a loose battery is a fail on its own, and a weak one shows up as slow cranking on a cold morning.
Derived from the DVSA failure strings testers recorded for the Rover 25. A check that finds nothing means the item is likely fine, not that the test is guaranteed.
75.2% of the 12,238 recorded Rover 25 MOT tests ended in a pass, −5.8 percentage points below the national average. 68.8% of those passed on the first attempt.
2003 is the strongest Rover 25 year on record at 75.7%, while 2006 is the weakest at 71.3%. The year-by-year table below lists every model year with at least 50 recorded tests.
The most recorded Rover 25 failures are "Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated" and "Joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt" — together around 16% of tests, mostly in the Body, chassis, structure section.