Pass rate
72.8%
Below average — 1.0 pts behind the 73.8% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 400 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £56–£155
2000 Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT pass rate
- 2000
- typical 120,540 mi
Check your postcode
Most common fault
Suspension
24.3% of faults · 21.0% nationally
mostly worn arm bushes, split ball-joint boots and broken coil springs.
Which year to buy
- Best 2000 72.8% pass · this year
- Avoid 2001 72.2% pass
Across the 2 years on record, a spread of 0.6 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 66.3%
- Typical mileage
- 121k mi
The 2000 Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT pass rate is 72.8% of its MOT tests — 1.0 points behind what its age and mileage predict. Suspension is the biggest single reason it fails, at 24.3% of what testers record.
Expert verdict
Body & chassis: 3.3× the national share
Body & chassis accounts for 18.2% of everything recorded on the 2000 Daihatsu Fourtrak, against 5.6% nationally — 12.6 points above. Suspension is still the single largest share at 24.3%, but at 21.0% nationally that one is ordinary. Look underneath for corrosion near the jacking points and suspension mounts; surface rust is normal, flaking metal is not.
- When it fails, it costs. Only 18% of this model’s typical repairs come in under £30 in parts — the failures here tend to be the kind that need a garage rather than a bulb.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a Daihatsu Fourtrak? Get an email when these numbers change .
How does the 2000 Daihatsu Fourtrak compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 73.8%, so this figure is 1.0 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 66.3%. The median 2000 Daihatsu Fourtrak in this dataset had covered 120,540 mi.
Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 75.4% of the time, April–September 70.3%.
The single most recorded failure item is "Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated", noted on 5.75% of tests.
- 400 recorded tests behind this page.
- 72.8% overall pass rate, 66.3% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the Daihatsu Fourtrak, the average is 72.6% — best year 2000 (72.8%), worst 2001 (72.2%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 400
- Typical mileage (median)
- 120,540 mi
- Make and model
- Daihatsu Fourtrak
- Updated
- 2026-11-07
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Ball Joint
Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.
Does mileage affect the Fourtrak MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 61% so small gaps stay visible.
Regional pass rates for the Fourtrak
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| Wales | 64 | 67.2% |
| South West | 61 | 73.8% |
| West Midlands | 58 | 74.1% |
| South East | 38 | 73.7% |
| East of England | 38 | 81.6% |
| Scotland | 35 | 60.0% |
| Yorkshire | 34 | 76.5% |
| North West | 28 | 67.9% |
| East Midlands | 27 | 77.8% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2000 Fourtrak
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2000 Fourtrak
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the suspension joints 5.8% of tests
“ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”
With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.
-
Check the windscreen 4.8% of tests
“windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
-
Check corrosion 4.0% of tests
“chassis condition or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a body mounting”
Look under the sills, around the jacking points and where the suspension mounts meet the body. Flaking, holed or crumbly metal fails; a brown stain on sound metal does not.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2000 Fourtrak through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £56–£155 — and 18% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £56–£155
- Cheapest common item: stop lamp not working
- £3–£12
- Dearest common item: chassis condition or chassis has excessive…
- £180–£450
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 40%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 18%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 400 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the Fourtrak, side by side
2 model years on record, from 2000 to 2001. Across them the pass rate runs from 72.2% to 72.8% — a spread of 0.6 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2000 72.8%ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2001 72.2% ball joint dust cover severely…
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2000 Daihatsu Fourtrak with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2000 cars with a similar record
- Volvo V70 72.8%
- Suzuki Jimny 72.9%
- Mazda Mx-5 73.2%
- Audi Tt 72.2%
- Toyota MR2 73.4%
- Volkswagen Lupo 73.4%
Closest pass rates among 2000 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2000 Daihatsu Fourtrak 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 1,054 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 261 | 24.30% | 20.98% | +3.32 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 196 | 18.20% | 5.57% | +12.63 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 159 | 14.80% | 12.21% | +2.59 |
| Brakes | 152 | 14.20% | 20.89% | −6.69 |
| Steering | 66 | 6.10% | 2.57% | +3.53 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 58 | 5.40% | 5.52% | −0.12 |
| Tyres | 54 | 5.00% | 19.76% | −14.76 |
| Visibility | 51 | 4.70% | 4.97% | −0.27 |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 33 | 3.10% | 0.82% | +2.28 |
| Non-component advisories | 24 | 2.20% | 4.18% | −1.98 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension | Minor | 5.8% | £18–45 |
| Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure | Minor | 5.3% | £80–250 |
| Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility | Minor | 4.8% | £80–200 |
| Chassis condition or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a body mounting Body, chassis, structure | Major | 4.0% | £180–450 |
| Stop lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 4.0% | £3–12 |
| Prescribed areas prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Major | 3.5% | £40–120 |
| Joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body, chassis, structure | Major | 3.3% | £80–250 |
| Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 3.3% | £5–20 |
| Ball joint excessively worn Suspension | Major | 3.0% | £18–45 |
| Exhaust system has a major leak of exhaust gases Body, chassis, structure | Major | 3.0% | £45–120 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes | Advisory | 10.3% | £80–180 |
| Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks | Advisory | 9.0% | £200–700 |
| Ball joint excessively worn Suspension | Advisory | 8.0% | £18–45 |
| Chassis condition corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced Body, chassis, structure | Advisory | 7.8% | £180–450 |
| Wheel bearings has excessive play Suspension | Advisory | 7.5% | £20–55 |
| Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres | Advisory | 6.8% | £45–95 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30-60k | 19 | 94.7% | 49,965 mi |
| 60-90k | 59 | 71.2% | 80,931 mi |
| 90-120k | 118 | 76.3% | 106,838 mi |
| 120k+ | 204 | 69.1% | 157,513 mi |
Source: 400 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2000 Fourtrak MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2000 Daihatsu Fourtrak?
72.8% of the 400 2000 Daihatsu Fourtrak tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 73.8% for cars first used in 2000. First-attempt pass rate: 66.3%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2000 Daihatsu Fourtrak?
The three most recorded items are ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (5.75%), joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (5.25%), windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (4.75%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2000 Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 94.7% of the time, falling to 69.1% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2000 Daihatsu Fourtrak in this dataset had covered 120,540 mi.
Does the season affect the 2000 Daihatsu Fourtrak MOT pass rate?
Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 75.4% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 70.3%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.