Calculate my fail sheet

2003 Mazda Demio MOT pass rate

Check your postcode

Pass rate by postcode →

Pass rate

66.8%

Below average — 5.8 pts behind the 72.6% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 253 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £61–£168

Which year to buy

  • Best 2009 79.2% pass
  • Avoid 2003 66.8% pass · this year

Across the 7 years on record, a spread of 12.4 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
55.8%
Typical mileage
69k mi

The 2003 Mazda Demio MOT pass rate is 66.8% of its MOT tests — 5.8 points behind what its age and mileage predict. Suspension is the biggest single reason it fails, at 29.8% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2003 Mazda Demio on the real record

66.8% of 2003 Mazda Demio MOTs passed — 253 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Expert verdict

Suspension: 1.4× the national share

Suspension accounts for 29.8% of everything recorded on the 2003 Mazda Demio, against 21.0% nationally — 8.8 points above. Ask for the front and rear suspension to be checked on a ramp before you buy — worn bushes and broken springs are cheap to look at and expensive to discover at test time.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Mazda Demio? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2003 Mazda Demio compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 72.6%, so this figure is 5.8 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 55.8%. The median 2003 Mazda Demio in this dataset had covered 69,497 mi.

Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 68.9% of the time, April–September 62.8%.

The single most recorded failure item is "Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength", noted on 12.25% of tests.

  • 253 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 66.8% overall pass rate, 55.8% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Mazda Demio, the average is 71.4% — best year 2009 (79.2%), worst 2003 (66.8%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
253
Typical mileage (median)
69,497 mi
Make and model
Mazda Demio
Updated
2026-11-07

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Corrosion Welding Repair

Typically a garage job — get quotes before committing.

Does mileage affect the Demio MOT pass rate?

0-30k 85.7%
30-60k 73.3%
60-90k 62.9%
90-120k 61.4%
120k+ 60.9%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 52% so small gaps stay visible.

Regional pass rates for the Demio

Region Tests Pass rate
South East 122 63.9%
South West 74 63.5%

Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.

What fails a 2003 Demio

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Suspension 29.8%
+8.8 pts vs national national 21.0% Price suspension parts
Brakes 15.7%
−5.2 pts vs national national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Body & chassis 11.1%
+5.5 pts vs national national 5.6% Find body panels
Lamps & electrics 10.1%
−2.1 pts vs national national 12.2% Order bulbs & wipers
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Tyres 9.9%
  • Emissions & leaks 7.1%
  • Steering 3.7%
  • Identification 3.7%
  • Advisories 3.6%
  • Visibility 3.0%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2003 Mazda Demio tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2003 Demio

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check corrosion 12.3% of tests

    “component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength”

    Look under the sills, around the jacking points and where the suspension mounts meet the body. Flaking, holed or crumbly metal fails; a brown stain on sound metal does not.

  2. Check the suspension joints 8.7% of tests

    “ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”

    With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.

  3. Check the lights 6.7% of tests

    “registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”

    Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2003 Demio through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £61–£168 — and 27% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£61–£168
Cheapest common item: srs malfunction indicator lamp warning lamp…
£3–£12
Dearest common item: component mounting prescribed areas…
£180–£450
Common items a careful owner can do at home
70%
Repairs that still cost under £30
27%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 253 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the Demio, side by side

7 model years on record, from 2000 to 2010. Across them the pass rate runs from 66.8% to 79.2% — a spread of 12.4 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2000 72.0% joints constant velocity boot…
  2. 2001 70.9% joints constant velocity boot…
  3. 2002 70.7% joints constant velocity boot…
  4. 2003 66.8%
    component mounting prescribed…
  5. 2008 77.1% headlamp lens slightly defective
  6. 2009 79.2% headlamp has a product on the…
  7. 2010 77.3% headlamp lens slightly defective

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2003 Mazda Demio with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2003 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2003 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2003 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2003 Mazda Demio 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 739 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Suspension 225 29.80% 20.98% +8.82
Brakes 119 15.70% 20.89% −5.19
Body, chassis, structure 84 11.10% 5.57% +5.53
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 76 10.10% 12.21% −2.11
Tyres 75 9.90% 19.76% −9.86
Noise, emissions and leaks 54 7.10% 5.52% +1.58
Steering 28 3.70% 2.57% +1.13
Identification of the vehicle 28 3.70% 1.76% +1.94
Non-component advisories 27 3.60% 4.18% −0.58
Visibility 23 3.00% 4.97% −1.97

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 253 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension Major 12.3% £180–450 Corrosion Welding Repair →
Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure Minor 11.5% £80–250 Body Panel Repair →
Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension Minor 8.7% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body, chassis, structure Major 7.5% £80–250 Body Panel Repair →
Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 6.7% £5–20 Number Plate Lamp →
Headlamp lens slightly defective Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 5.5% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt Steering Minor 5.5% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Ball joint excessively worn Suspension Major 4.3% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 3.2% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Srs malfunction indicator lamp warning lamp indicates a fault Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems Major 3.2% £3–12 Indicator Bulb →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Advisory 15.4% £45–95
Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension Advisory 15.0% £180–450
Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension Advisory 14.6% £40–150
Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks Advisory 12.7% £200–700
Flexible brake hoses ferrule excessively corroded Brakes Advisory 11.1% £25–70
Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes Advisory 10.7% £80–180

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
0-30k 7 85.7% 22,750 mi
30-60k 90 73.3% 46,337 mi
60-90k 89 62.9% 74,676 mi
90-120k 44 61.4% 104,880 mi
120k+ 23 60.9% 140,200 mi

Source: 253 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2003 Demio MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2003 Mazda Demio?

66.8% of the 253 2003 Mazda Demio tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.6% for cars first used in 2003. First-attempt pass rate: 55.8%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2003 Mazda Demio?

The three most recorded items are component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength (12.25%), joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (11.46%), ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (8.70%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2003 Mazda Demio MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 85.7% of the time, falling to 60.9% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2003 Mazda Demio in this dataset had covered 69,497 mi.

Does the season affect the 2003 Mazda Demio MOT pass rate?

Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 68.9% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 62.8%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.