Calculate my fail sheet

2003 Volvo V40 MOT pass rate

Check your postcode

Pass rate by postcode →

Pass rate

67.3%

Below average — 5.3 pts behind the 72.6% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 3,867 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £42–£117

Which year to buy

  • Best 2019 87.0% pass
  • Avoid 2004 67.0% pass

Across the 13 years on record, a spread of 20 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
55.5%
Typical mileage
123k mi

The 2003 Volvo V40 MOT pass rate is 67.3% of its MOT tests — 5.3 points behind what its age and mileage predict. Brakes is the biggest single reason it fails, at 23.2% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2003 Volvo V40 on the real record

67.3% of 2003 Volvo V40 MOTs passed — 3,867 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Expert verdict

Fewer problems with tyres

Tyres are 10.2% of this car’s recorded faults, against 19.8% nationally — the mirror image of the usual story on a car of this age.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Volvo V40? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2003 Volvo V40 compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 72.6%, so this figure is 5.3 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 55.5%. The median 2003 Volvo V40 in this dataset had covered 122,708 mi.

70% of the tests on this vehicle ran on Petrol, which passed 67.5% of the time. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 67.5% of the time, April–September 67.2%.

The single most recorded failure item is "Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated", noted on 11.48% of tests.

  • 3,867 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 67.3% overall pass rate, 55.5% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Volvo V40, the average is 80.5% — best year 2019 (87.0%), worst 2004 (67.0%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
3,867
Typical mileage (median)
122,708 mi
Make and model
Volvo V40
Updated
2026-11-07

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Ball Joint

Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.

Does mileage affect the V40 MOT pass rate?

0-30k 66.7%
30-60k 78.7%
60-90k 70.1%
90-120k 68.5%
120k+ 64.5%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 56% so small gaps stay visible.

Fuel type and reliability

Petrol 67.5%
Diesel 66.9%
LPG 80.0%

Pass rate by fuel type. Petrol is the most common here (70% of tests).

Where the Volvo V40 is most common

Across all V40 model years on record (2000–2019): 142,582 Volvo V40 cars tested in a recordable postcode area, across 352,235 tests. Birmingham (B) has the most, with 3,844 cars tested there. Cars are counted by the postcode area of the MOT station, so this is where they were tested, not necessarily where their owners live.

# Postcode area Cars Share of all Tests Pass rate
1 Birmingham (B) 3,844 2.7% 8,859 83.0%
2 Sheffield (S) 3,532 2.5% 8,933 81.7%
3 Nottingham (NG) 3,098 2.2% 7,892 79.6%
4 Peterborough (PE) 3,096 2.2% 7,458 81.2%
5 Leicester (LE) 2,709 1.9% 6,657 83.3%
6 Glasgow (G) 2,653 1.9% 6,715 81.8%
7 Newcastle upon Tyne (NE) 2,576 1.8% 6,747 81.8%
8 Doncaster (DN) 2,506 1.8% 6,289 81.1%
9 Coventry (CV) 2,415 1.7% 5,769 83.2%
10 York (YO) 2,389 1.7% 6,691 78.4%
11 Edinburgh (EH) 2,179 1.5% 5,832 76.9%
12 Cardiff (CF) 2,107 1.5% 5,663 79.1%
13 Derby (DE) 2,106 1.5% 4,843 82.3%
14 Northampton (NN) 1,999 1.4% 4,903 78.7%
15 Ipswich (IP) 1,977 1.4% 5,323 79.5%
16 Leeds (LS) 1,972 1.4% 4,747 79.7%
17 Manchester (M) 1,948 1.4% 4,314 80.8%
18 Reading (RG) 1,947 1.4% 4,819 81.6%
19 Norwich (NR) 1,946 1.4% 5,388 78.1%
20 Chester (CH) 1,932 1.4% 5,029 78.9%

The twenty areas with the most Volvo V40 cars in the record, sorted by car count — sort the columns for a different question. Cars tested at a station whose postcode area could not be resolved are counted in the model's total but in no area, so the shares add up to slightly under 100% even across every area, and an area's cars are a subset of the model's. Pass rate is blank below 30 tests in an area, where a percentage is noise rather than a finding. How this model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Regional pass rates for the V40

Region Tests Pass rate
South East 983 66.2%
South West 590 63.1%
East of England 439 67.2%
North West 379 68.3%
West Midlands 369 68.3%
Yorkshire 267 68.2%
London 227 77.5%
Wales 203 64.5%
East Midlands 196 71.9%
Scotland 137 65.7%
North East 77 71.4%

Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.

What fails a 2003 V40

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Brakes 23.2%
+2.3 pts vs national national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Suspension 21.0%
in line with the national share national 21.0% Price suspension parts
Lamps & electrics 13.7%
+1.5 pts vs national national 12.2% Order bulbs & wipers
Tyres 10.2%
−9.6 pts vs national national 19.8% Compare tyre prices
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Body & chassis 7.9%
  • Emissions & leaks 5.6%
  • Steering 4.6%
  • Visibility 3.8%
  • Seat belts 3.4%
  • Identification 3.1%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2003 Volvo V40 tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2003 V40

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check the suspension joints 11.5% of tests

    “ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”

    With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.

  2. Check the lights 5.5% of tests

    “position lamp not working”

    Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.

  3. Check the windscreen 4.9% of tests

    “windscreen damaged”

    Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2003 V40 through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £42–£117 — and 26% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£42–£117
Cheapest common item: registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the…
£5–£20
Dearest common item: steering rack gaiter missing or no longer…
£120–£300
Common items a careful owner can do at home
60%
Repairs that still cost under £30
26%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 3,867 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the V40, side by side

13 model years on record, from 2000 to 2019. Across them the pass rate runs from 67.0% to 87.0% — a spread of 20 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2000 68.3% ball joint dust cover severely…
  2. 2001 70.0% ball joint dust cover severely…
  3. 2002 69.4% ball joint dust cover severely…
  4. 2003 67.3%
    ball joint dust cover severely…
  5. 2004 67.0% ball joint dust cover severely…
  6. 2012 75.8% coil spring fractured or broken
  7. 2013 77.8% coil spring fractured or broken
  8. 2014 77.9% coil spring fractured or broken
  9. 2015 78.8% coil spring fractured or broken
  10. 2016 81.2% coil spring fractured or broken
  11. 2017 83.6% coil spring fractured or broken
  12. 2018 84.8% coil spring fractured or broken
  13. 2019 87.0% coil spring fractured or broken

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2003 Volvo V40 with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2003 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2003 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2003 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2003 Volvo V40 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 13,026 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Brakes 3,124 23.20% 20.89% +2.31
Suspension 2,837 21.00% 20.98% +0.02
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 1,852 13.70% 12.21% +1.49
Tyres 1,377 10.20% 19.76% −9.56
Body, chassis, structure 1,061 7.90% 5.57% +2.33
Noise, emissions and leaks 761 5.60% 5.52% +0.08
Steering 618 4.60% 2.57% +2.03
Visibility 509 3.80% 4.97% −1.17
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 465 3.40% 0.82% +2.58
Identification of the vehicle 422 3.10% 1.76% +1.34

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 3,867 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension Minor 11.5% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure Minor 7.1% £80–250 Body Panel Repair →
Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 5.5% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility Minor 4.9% £80–200 Windscreen →
Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 4.7% £5–20 Number Plate Lamp →
Steering rack gaiter missing or no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Steering Major 4.3% £120–300 Steering Rack →
Coil spring fractured or broken Suspension Major 4.2% £25–65 Coil Spring →
Position lamp with a multiple light source up to 1/2 not functioning Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 3.8% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body, chassis, structure Major 3.6% £80–250 Body Panel Repair →
Linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension Minor 3.6% £18–45 Ball Joint →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes Advisory 20.0% £80–180
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Advisory 16.4% £45–95
Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes Advisory 15.4% £45–110
Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks Advisory 11.9% £200–700
Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres Advisory 11.6% £45–95
Registration plates inscription illegible Identification of the vehicle Advisory 10.2% £20–80

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
0-30k 21 66.7% 24,311 mi
30-60k 239 78.7% 48,791 mi
60-90k 658 70.1% 77,573 mi
90-120k 953 68.5% 105,095 mi
120k+ 1,994 64.5% 159,241 mi

Source: 3,867 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2003 V40 MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2003 Volvo V40?

67.3% of the 3,867 2003 Volvo V40 tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.6% for cars first used in 2003. First-attempt pass rate: 55.5%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2003 Volvo V40?

The three most recorded items are ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (11.48%), joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (7.11%), position lamp not working (5.46%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2003 Volvo V40 MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 66.7% of the time, falling to 64.5% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2003 Volvo V40 in this dataset had covered 122,708 mi.

Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2003 Volvo V40?

Petrol: 67.5% pass rate across 2,709 tests. Diesel: 66.9% pass rate across 1,148 tests. LPG: 80.0% pass rate across 10 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.

Does the season affect the 2003 Volvo V40 MOT pass rate?

Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 67.5% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 67.2%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.