Pass rate, every year
59 tests across 1 model years, 2004–2004.
−8.1 pts vs the national average
Pass rate, every year
59 tests across 1 model years, 2004–2004.
−8.1 pts vs the national average
Best year to buy
2004 72.9%
The strongest of the 1 years on record. See the 2004 page →
Worst year to buy
2004 72.9%
0.0 points below the 2004 peak. See the 2004 page →
The Mitsubishi Challenger MOT pass rate is 72.9%, −8.1 percentage points below the UK average. That is 59 DVSA MOT tests recorded between 2004 and 2004. This page lists the most common Mitsubishi Challenger MOT failures by category, names the best and worst model years, and finishes with a pre-MOT checklist you can run at home.
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Mitsubishi Challenger MOT pass rates does in your corner of the country.
The Mitsubishi Challenger passed on its first attempt in 66.0%, and its overall record sits −8.1 percentage points below the national average for all cars. These figures come from every recorded DVSA MOT test for the Mitsubishi Challenger in the 2023–2025 data: 59 tests across 1 model years (2004–2004). A test still carries exactly one pass or fail verdict.
| Measure | This model |
|---|---|
| Tests analysed | 59 |
| Overall pass rate | 72.9% |
| Passed on first attempt | 66.0% |
| Average mileage at test | 175,820 mi |
| Model years covered | 2004–2004 (1 years) |
| Versus UK national average | −8.1 pts below |
Figures are computed from every recorded DVSA test for this model in the 2023–2025 data.
Every MOT failure a tester records belongs to one inspection section of the DVSA manual. For the Mitsubishi Challenger, the Body, chassis, structure section leads the record — the breakdown below shows where the recorded failures cluster, then the exact strings behind the three biggest sections.
| Inspection section | Share of failures |
|---|---|
| Body, chassis, structure | 29% |
| Suspension | 16% |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 16% |
| Visibility | 13% |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 10% |
| Brakes | 10% |
| Steering | 6% |
Shares are over the Mitsubishi Challenger's recorded defect strings, merged across its year pages.
Around 29% of the recorded Mitsubishi Challenger failures fall in the Body, chassis, structure section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated" (10.2%), "Exhaust system has a major leak of exhaust gases" (5.1%) among the Mitsubishi Challenger's body, chassis, structure faults.
Around 16% of the recorded Mitsubishi Challenger failures fall in the Suspension section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Coil spring fractured or broken" (5.1%), "Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength" (3.4%) among the Mitsubishi Challenger's suspension faults.
Around 16% of the recorded Mitsubishi Challenger failures fall in the Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Position lamp not working" (5.1%), "Headlamp lens slightly defective" (3.4%) among the Mitsubishi Challenger's lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment faults.
The descriptions below are the exact DVSA failure strings testers recorded most often for the Mitsubishi Challenger, each with how many of the model's 59 tests it was noted on.
The strongest Mitsubishi Challenger model year on record is 2004 (72.9% across 59 tests), and the weakest is 2004 (72.9%). Years with fewer than 50 recorded tests are excluded, so these are the years with enough MOT history to mean something.
| Year | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| 2004 Challenger | 59 | 72.9% |
Newest model year first. Only years with at least 50 recorded tests are listed.
These checks follow this Mitsubishi Challenger's own most-recorded failure strings, starting with what a tester is most likely to flag on a Mitsubishi Challenger.
the windscreen — “windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
the coil springs — “coil spring fractured or broken”
Look up inside each wheel arch with a torch, all the way round the spring. A snapped spring usually breaks at the very bottom coil, where a quick glance will not reach.
the exhaust and emissions — “exhaust system has a major leak of exhaust gases”
Listen for a blow at idle and have someone rev it gently. Then look at the tailpipe smoke: blue is oil, white when warm is coolant, black is over-fuelling. Any of those and the emissions test is the least of it.
Derived from the DVSA failure strings testers recorded for the Mitsubishi Challenger. A check that finds nothing means the item is likely fine, not that the test is guaranteed.
72.9% of the 59 recorded Mitsubishi Challenger MOT tests ended in a pass, −8.1 percentage points below the national average. 66.0% of those passed on the first attempt.
2004 is the strongest Mitsubishi Challenger year on record at 72.9%, while 2004 is the weakest at 72.9%. The year-by-year table below lists every model year with at least 50 recorded tests.
The most recorded Mitsubishi Challenger failures are "Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated" and "Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view" — together around 17% of tests, mostly in the Body, chassis, structure section.