Pass rate, every year
116 tests across 2 model years, 2015–2017.
+7.8 pts vs the national average
Pass rate, every year
116 tests across 2 model years, 2015–2017.
+7.8 pts vs the national average
Best year to buy
2017 89.8%
The strongest of the 2 years on record. See the 2017 page →
Worst year to buy
2015 87.7%
2.1 points below the 2017 peak. See the 2015 page →
The Niesmann Bischoff Arto MOT pass rate is 88.8%, +7.8 percentage points above the UK average. That is 116 DVSA MOT tests recorded between 2015 and 2017. This page lists the most common Niesmann Bischoff Arto MOT failures by category, names the best and worst model years, and finishes with a pre-MOT checklist you can run at home.
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Niesmann Bischoff Arto MOT pass rates does in your corner of the country.
The Niesmann Bischoff Arto passed on its first attempt in 87.4%, and its overall record sits +7.8 percentage points above the national average for all cars. These figures come from every recorded DVSA MOT test for the Niesmann Bischoff Arto in the 2023–2025 data: 116 tests across 2 model years (2015–2017). A test still carries exactly one pass or fail verdict.
| Measure | This model |
|---|---|
| Tests analysed | 116 |
| Overall pass rate | 88.8% |
| Passed on first attempt | 87.4% |
| Average mileage at test | 24,357 mi |
| Model years covered | 2015–2017 (2 years) |
| Versus UK national average | +7.8 pts above |
Figures are computed from every recorded DVSA test for this model in the 2023–2025 data.
Every MOT failure a tester records belongs to one inspection section of the DVSA manual. For the Niesmann Bischoff Arto, the Visibility section leads the record — the breakdown below shows where the recorded failures cluster, then the exact strings behind the three biggest sections.
| Inspection section | Share of failures |
|---|---|
| Visibility | 25% |
| Brakes | 25% |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 16% |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 13% |
| Body, chassis, structure | 9% |
| Identification of the vehicle | 6% |
| Suspension | 6% |
Shares are over the Niesmann Bischoff Arto's recorded defect strings, merged across its year pages.
Around 25% of the recorded Niesmann Bischoff Arto failures fall in the Visibility section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view" (6.9%) among the Niesmann Bischoff Arto's visibility faults.
Around 25% of the recorded Niesmann Bischoff Arto failures fall in the Brakes section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements" (4.3%), "Hand lever has insufficient reserve travel" (0.9%), "Lever has abnormal movement of levers indicating excessive wear or maladjustment" (0.9%) among the Niesmann Bischoff Arto's brakes faults.
Around 16% of the recorded Niesmann Bischoff Arto failures fall in the Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect" (0.9%), "Headlamp aim too low and too far to the left." (0.9%), "Headlamp aim too high" (0.9%) among the Niesmann Bischoff Arto's lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment faults.
The descriptions below are the exact DVSA failure strings testers recorded most often for the Niesmann Bischoff Arto, each with how many of the model's 116 tests it was noted on.
The strongest Niesmann Bischoff Arto model year on record is 2017 (89.8% across 59 tests), and the weakest is 2015 (87.7%). The gap between them is 2.1 points. Years with fewer than 50 recorded tests are excluded, so these are the years with enough MOT history to mean something.
Newest model year first. Only years with at least 50 recorded tests are listed.
These checks follow this Niesmann Bischoff Arto's own most-recorded failure strings, starting with what a tester is most likely to flag on a Niesmann Bischoff Arto.
the windscreen — “windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
the lights — “srs malfunction indicator lamp warning lamp indicates a fault”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
the number plates — “registration plates does not conform to the specified requirements”
Check both plates are present, legible and correctly spaced, with the postcode of the supplier and the BS AU 145e mark. A private plate in the wrong style is a fail before the car is even looked at.
Derived from the DVSA failure strings testers recorded for the Niesmann Bischoff Arto. A check that finds nothing means the item is likely fine, not that the test is guaranteed.
88.8% of the 116 recorded Niesmann Bischoff Arto MOT tests ended in a pass, +7.8 percentage points above the national average. 87.4% of those passed on the first attempt.
2017 is the strongest Niesmann Bischoff Arto year on record at 89.8%, while 2015 is the weakest at 87.7%. The year-by-year table below lists every model year with at least 50 recorded tests.
The most recorded Niesmann Bischoff Arto failures are "Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view" and "Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements" — together around 11% of tests, mostly in the Visibility section.