Niesmann Bischoff MOT pass rates

Niesmann Bischoff MOT pass rates, ranked across 1 models and 116 DVSA MOT tests between 2015 and 2017from the strongest model to the weakest. The tables below compare every model with enough tests to rank, list the most-tested models, and link to each model's own pass-rate and fault pages.

MOT PASS RATES

How every Niesmann Bischoff model really fares

88.8% across 116 tests in 1 models, 2023–2025

Pass rates

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

How Niesmann Bischoff models compare on the MOT

Only 1 Niesmann Bischoff model has enough MOT history to compare, out of 116 recorded tests. The pass-rate table above still lists every model; the number of tests each one records is shown so you can weigh a small-sample result against a big one.

Every figure above is drawn from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records for the 2015–2017 data years: 116 tests across 1 Niesmann Bischoff models. A pass rate counts every completed test — first attempt and retests — so the figures above include a van or motorhome being tested twice in one year. The first-time pass figures on each model page are lower as a result. See the methodology page for exactly how each rate is calculated and how the DVSA source data is filtered.

Pass rate, all models

88.8% Above average

116 tests across 1 models, 2015–2017.

Best model

No model has enough tests to rank.

Worst model

No model has enough tests to rank.

All Niesmann Bischoff models ranked by pass rate

Model Pass rate Tests Best year Worst year

Ranked by aggregate pass rate across all years, for the 0 models with at least 2,000 tests — the 1 smaller Niesmann Bischoff models are listed below, unranked.

Other Niesmann Bischoff models

Fewer than 2,000 tests each, so they are not ranked — every model still has its own pass-rate page.

Most-tested Niesmann Bischoff models

Compare with the market

Best and worst lists, and the full A–Z.

Reading the numbers

A pass rate covers every completed test recorded for that model and year, including retests. First-attempt figures are lower. See how we calculate.