2011 Saab 9-3 Linear MOT pass rate

Pass rate

77.2%

Around average — 1.3 pts ahead of the 75.9% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 123 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £26–£65

Which year to buy

  • Best 2010 78.8% pass
  • Avoid 2009 70.8% pass

Across the 8 years on record, a spread of 8 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
72.2%
Typical mileage
64k mi

The 2011 Saab 9-3 Linear MOT pass rate is 77.2% of its MOT tests — 1.3 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. Brakes is the biggest single reason it fails, at 23.9% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2011 Saab 9-3 Linear on the real record

77.2% of 2011 Saab 9-3 Linear MOTs passed — 123 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Check your postcode

MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Saab 9-3 Linear does in your corner of the country.

How one model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Expert verdict

When it fails, it costs

Only 17% of this model’s typical repairs come in under £30 in parts — the failures here tend to be the kind that need a garage rather than a bulb.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Saab 9-3 Linear? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2011 Saab 9-3 Linear compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 75.9%, so this figure is 1.3 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 72.2%. The median 2011 Saab 9-3 Linear in this dataset had covered 63,982 mi.

The most common fuel recorded here is Petrol — 68% of tests, with a 75.0% pass rate. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 79.4% of the time, April–September 75.0%.

The single most recorded failure item is "Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated", noted on 7.32% of tests.

  • 123 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 77.2% overall pass rate, 72.2% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Saab 9-3 Linear, the average is 76.2% — best year 2010 (78.8%), worst 2009 (70.8%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
123
Typical mileage (median)
63,982 mi
Make and model
Saab 9-3 Linear
Updated
2026-11-05

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Ball Joint

Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.

Does mileage affect the 9-3 Linear MOT pass rate?

0-30k 80.0%
30-60k 78.7%
60-90k 78.9%
90-120k 76.5%
120k+ 68.8%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 60% so small gaps stay visible.

Fuel type and reliability

Petrol 75.0%
Diesel 82.1%

Pass rate by fuel type. Petrol is the most common here (68% of tests).

Regional pass rates for the 9-3 Linear

Region Tests Pass rate
South East 32 78.1%
East of England 16 81.3%
South West 15 66.7%

Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.

What fails a 2011 9-3 Linear

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Brakes 23.9%
+3.0 pts vs national national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Suspension 23.4%
+2.4 pts vs national national 21.0% Price suspension parts
Tyres 18.1%
−1.7 pts vs national national 19.8% Compare tyre prices
Lamps & electrics 13.3%
+1.1 pts vs national national 12.2% Order bulbs & wipers
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Emissions & leaks 9.0%
  • Visibility 3.7%
  • Body & chassis 2.1%
  • Identification 2.1%
  • Road wheels 2.1%
  • Advisories 1.6%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2011 Saab 9-3 Linear tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2011 9-3 Linear

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check the suspension joints 7.3% of tests

    “ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”

    With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.

  2. Check the lights 4.1% of tests

    “registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”

    Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.

  3. Check the coil springs 2.4% of tests

    “coil spring fractured or broken”

    Look up inside each wheel arch with a torch, all the way round the spring. A snapped spring usually breaks at the very bottom coil, where a quick glance will not reach.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2011 9-3 Linear through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £26–£65 — and 17% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£26–£65
Cheapest common item: malfunction indicator lamp inoperative or…
£3–£12
Dearest common item: parking brake performance inoperative on one…
£60–£150
Common items a careful owner can do at home
90%
Repairs that still cost under £30
17%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 123 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the 9-3 Linear, side by side

8 model years on record, from 2005 to 2012. Across them the pass rate runs from 70.8% to 78.8% — a spread of 8 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2005 74.6% registration plate lamp(s)…
  2. 2006 78.1% registration plate lamp(s)…
  3. 2007 76.3% registration plate lamp(s)…
  4. 2008 73.3% coil spring fractured or broken
  5. 2009 70.8% windscreen damaged but not…
  6. 2010 78.8% ball joint dust cover severely…
  7. 2011 77.2%
    ball joint dust cover severely…
  8. 2012 78.5% ball joint dust cover severely…

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2011 Saab 9-3 Linear with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2011 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2011 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2011 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2011 Saab 9-3 Linear 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 187 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Brakes 45 23.90% 20.89% +3.01
Suspension 44 23.40% 20.98% +2.42
Tyres 34 18.10% 19.76% −1.66
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 25 13.30% 12.21% +1.09
Noise, emissions and leaks 17 9.00% 5.52% +3.48
Visibility 7 3.70% 4.97% −1.27
Body, chassis, structure 4 2.10% 5.57% −3.47
Identification of the vehicle 4 2.10% 1.76% +0.34
Road Wheels 4 2.10% 0.75% +1.35
Non-component advisories 3 1.60% 4.18% −2.58

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 123 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension Minor 7.3% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements Brakes Major 5.7% £45–110 Brake Discs and Pads Set →
Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 4.1% £5–20 Number Plate Lamp →
Fixing missing Road Wheels Major 3.3% £20–55 Wheel Hub Bearing Kit →
Linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Suspension Major 3.3% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Linkage ball joints ball joint excessively worn Suspension Major 3.3% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Parking brake performance inoperative on one side Brakes Major 3.3% £60–150 Brake Servicing →
Coil spring fractured or broken Suspension Major 2.4% £25–65 Coil Spring →
Has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords Tyres Major 2.4% £45–95 Tyres →
Malfunction indicator lamp inoperative or indicates a malfunction Noise, emissions and leaks Major 2.4% £3–12 Indicator Bulb →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes Advisory 13.8% £45–110
Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks Advisory 11.4% £200–700
Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres Advisory 11.4% £45–95
Sub-frame corroded and seriously weakened Suspension Advisory 9.8% £180–450
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Advisory 7.3% £45–95
Brake discs significantly and obviously worn Brakes Advisory 3.3% £45–110

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
0-30k 5 80.0% 21,544 mi
30-60k 47 78.7% 45,929 mi
60-90k 38 78.9% 73,407 mi
90-120k 17 76.5% 107,346 mi
120k+ 16 68.8% 133,256 mi

Source: 123 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2011 9-3 Linear MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2011 Saab 9-3 Linear?

77.2% of the 123 2011 Saab 9-3 Linear tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 75.9% for cars first used in 2011. First-attempt pass rate: 72.2%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2011 Saab 9-3 Linear?

The three most recorded items are ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (7.32%), rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements (5.69%), registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.07%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2011 Saab 9-3 Linear MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 80.0% of the time, falling to 68.8% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2011 Saab 9-3 Linear in this dataset had covered 63,982 mi.

Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2011 Saab 9-3 Linear?

Petrol: 75.0% pass rate across 84 tests. Diesel: 82.1% pass rate across 39 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.

Does the season affect the 2011 Saab 9-3 Linear MOT pass rate?

Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 79.4% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 75.0%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.