2010 Toyota Iq MOT pass rate

Pass rate

83.7%

Around average — 9.0 pts ahead of the 74.7% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 13,019 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £18–£50

Which year to buy

  • Best 2014 90.5% pass
  • Avoid 2009 82.9% pass

Across the 7 years on record, a spread of 7.6 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
80.8%
Typical mileage
72k mi

The 2010 Toyota Iq MOT pass rate is 83.7% of its MOT tests — 9.0 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. Brakes is the biggest single reason it fails, at 27.4% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2010 Toyota Iq on the real record

83.7% of 2010 Toyota Iq MOTs passed — 13,019 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Check your postcode

MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Toyota Iq does in your corner of the country.

How one model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Expert verdict

Brakes: 1.3× the national share

Brakes make up 27.4% of everything recorded on the 2010 Toyota Iq, against 20.9% nationally — 6.5 points above. Have the discs and pads measured rather than glanced at, and ask whether the handbrake holds on a slope.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Toyota Iq? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2010 Toyota Iq compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 74.7%, so this figure is 9.0 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 80.8%. The median 2010 Toyota Iq in this dataset had covered 71,623 mi.

Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 83.9% of the time, April–September 83.4%.

The single most recorded failure item is "Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources", noted on 3.11% of tests.

  • 13,019 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 83.7% overall pass rate, 80.8% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Toyota Iq, the average is 84.6% — best year 2014 (90.5%), worst 2009 (82.9%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
13,019
Typical mileage (median)
71,623 mi
Make and model
Toyota Iq
Updated
2026-11-05

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Number Plate Lamp

Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.

Does mileage affect the Iq MOT pass rate?

0-30k 91.3%
30-60k 87.1%
60-90k 82.7%
90-120k 81.4%
120k+ 76.3%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 68% so small gaps stay visible.

Regional pass rates for the Iq

Region Tests Pass rate
South East 3,521 85.7%
South West 1,580 81.2%
East of England 1,353 84.9%
North West 1,346 82.8%
London 1,183 87.4%
Yorkshire 1,138 81.4%
West Midlands 877 85.3%
East Midlands 662 85.3%
Scotland 564 73.8%
Wales 481 81.9%
North East 314 78.0%

Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.

What fails a 2010 Iq

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Brakes 27.4%
+6.5 pts vs national national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Suspension 19.5%
−1.5 pts vs national national 21.0% Price suspension parts
Tyres 17.7%
−2.1 pts vs national national 19.8% Compare tyre prices
Lamps & electrics 14.0%
+1.8 pts vs national national 12.2% Order bulbs & wipers
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Visibility 6.6%
  • Body & chassis 5.8%
  • Emissions & leaks 3.1%
  • Identification 2.7%
  • Advisories 2.0%
  • Seat belts 0.5%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2010 Toyota Iq tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2010 Iq

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check the lights 3.1% of tests

    “registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”

    Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.

  2. Check the suspension joints 2.5% of tests

    “linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”

    With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.

  3. Check the windscreen 2.4% of tests

    “windscreen damaged”

    Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2010 Iq through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £18–£50 — and 60% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£18–£50
Cheapest common item: registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the…
£5–£20
Dearest common item: windscreen damaged
£80–£200
Common items a careful owner can do at home
90%
Repairs that still cost under £30
60%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 13,019 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the Iq, side by side

7 model years on record, from 2008 to 2014. Across them the pass rate runs from 82.9% to 90.5% — a spread of 7.6 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2008 87.0% headlamp lens slightly defective
  2. 2009 82.9% headlamp lens slightly defective
  3. 2010 83.7%
    registration plate lamp(s)…
  4. 2011 85.0% registration plate lamp(s)…
  5. 2012 86.5% registration plate lamp(s)…
  6. 2013 87.5% registration plate lamp(s)…
  7. 2014 90.5% registration plate lamp(s)…

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2010 Toyota Iq with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2010 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2010 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2010 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2010 Toyota Iq 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 22,012 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Brakes 6,078 27.40% 20.89% +6.51
Suspension 4,332 19.50% 20.98% −1.48
Tyres 3,916 17.70% 19.76% −2.06
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 3,101 14.00% 12.21% +1.79
Visibility 1,463 6.60% 4.97% +1.63
Body, chassis, structure 1,288 5.80% 5.57% +0.23
Noise, emissions and leaks 686 3.10% 5.52% −2.42
Identification of the vehicle 598 2.70% 1.76% +0.94
Non-component advisories 442 2.00% 4.18% −2.18
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 108 0.50% 0.82% −0.32

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 13,019 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 3.1% £5–20 Number Plate Lamp →
Headlamp lens slightly defective Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 2.7% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension Minor 2.5% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility Minor 2.4% £80–200 Windscreen →
Linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Suspension Major 1.9% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Wipers blade defective Visibility Minor 1.9% £8–22 Wiper Blade →
Wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility Major 1.9% £8–22 Wiper Blade →
Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension Minor 1.7% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 1.7% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Rectified 1.4% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres Advisory 14.0% £45–95
Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes Advisory 12.7% £45–110
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Advisory 10.9% £45–95
Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes Advisory 9.5% £80–180
Brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes Advisory 8.5% £18–45
Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension Advisory 5.8% £40–150

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
0-30k 906 91.3% 22,182 mi
30-60k 3,705 87.1% 46,798 mi
60-90k 4,524 82.7% 74,278 mi
90-120k 2,624 81.4% 102,997 mi
120k+ 1,250 76.3% 140,834 mi

Source: 13,019 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2010 Iq MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2010 Toyota Iq?

83.7% of the 13,019 2010 Toyota Iq tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 74.7% for cars first used in 2010. First-attempt pass rate: 80.8%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2010 Toyota Iq?

The three most recorded items are registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (3.11%), headlamp lens slightly defective (2.66%), linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (2.50%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2010 Toyota Iq MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 91.3% of the time, falling to 76.3% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2010 Toyota Iq in this dataset had covered 71,623 mi.

Does the season affect the 2010 Toyota Iq MOT pass rate?

Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 83.9% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 83.4%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.