Pass rate, every year
4,980 tests across 3 model years, 2020–2022.
+13.0 pts vs the national average
Pass rate, every year
4,980 tests across 3 model years, 2020–2022.
+13.0 pts vs the national average
Best year to buy
2022 94.5%
The strongest of the 3 years on record. See the 2022 page →
Worst year to buy
2020 93.2%
1.3 points below the 2022 peak. See the 2020 page →
The Volvo XC40 R-Design T4 MOT pass rate is 94.0%, +13.0 percentage points above the UK average. That is 4,980 DVSA MOT tests recorded between 2020 and 2022. This page lists the most common Volvo XC40 R-Design T4 MOT failures by category, names the best and worst model years, and finishes with a pre-MOT checklist you can run at home.
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Volvo XC40 R-Design T4 MOT pass rates does in your corner of the country.
The Volvo XC40 R-Design T4 passed on its first attempt in 93.7%, and its overall record sits +13.0 percentage points above the national average for all cars. These figures come from every recorded DVSA MOT test for the Volvo XC40 R-Design T4 in the 2023–2025 data: 4,980 tests across 3 model years (2020–2022). A test still carries exactly one pass or fail verdict.
| Measure | This model |
|---|---|
| Tests analysed | 4,980 |
| Overall pass rate | 94.0% |
| Passed on first attempt | 93.7% |
| Average mileage at test | 41,606 mi |
| Model years covered | 2020–2022 (3 years) |
| Versus UK national average | +13.0 pts above |
Figures are computed from every recorded DVSA test for this model in the 2023–2025 data.
Every MOT failure a tester records belongs to one inspection section of the DVSA manual. For the Volvo XC40 R-Design T4, the Visibility section leads the record — the breakdown below shows where the recorded failures cluster, then the exact strings behind the three biggest sections.
| Inspection section | Share of failures |
|---|---|
| Visibility | 49% |
| Tyres | 42% |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 5% |
| Body, chassis, structure | 3% |
| Brakes | 1% |
| Identification of the vehicle | 1% |
Shares are over the Volvo XC40 R-Design T4's recorded defect strings, merged across its year pages.
Around 49% of the recorded Volvo XC40 R-Design T4 failures fall in the Visibility section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view" (2.0%), "Wipers blade defective" (1.5%), "Wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively" (0.9%) among the Volvo XC40 R-Design T4's visibility faults.
Around 42% of the recorded Volvo XC40 R-Design T4 failures fall in the Tyres section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords" (1.6%), "Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm" (1.1%), "Has ply or cords exposed" (0.8%) among the Volvo XC40 R-Design T4's tyres faults.
Around 5% of the recorded Volvo XC40 R-Design T4 failures fall in the Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Headlamp aim too high" (0.5%) among the Volvo XC40 R-Design T4's lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment faults.
The descriptions below are the exact DVSA failure strings testers recorded most often for the Volvo XC40 R-Design T4, each with how many of the model's 4,980 tests it was noted on.
The strongest Volvo XC40 R-Design T4 model year on record is 2022 (94.5% across 671 tests), and the weakest is 2020 (93.2%). The gap between them is 1.3 points. Years with fewer than 50 recorded tests are excluded, so these are the years with enough MOT history to mean something.
| Year | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 XC40 R-Design T4 | 671 | 94.5% |
| 2021 XC40 R-Design T4 | 3,661 | 94.0% |
| 2020 XC40 R-Design T4 | 648 | 93.2% |
Newest model year first. Only years with at least 50 recorded tests are listed.
These checks follow this Volvo XC40 R-Design T4's own most-recorded failure strings, starting with what a tester is most likely to flag on a Volvo XC40 R-Design T4.
the windscreen — “windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
the wipers and washers — “wipers blade defective”
Run the wipers with the screen wet: they should clear it in one sweep without smearing or juddering. Top the washer bottle up and check both jets hit the screen.
the tyre tread — “tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm”
Check all four tyres cold, including the inner shoulder where wear hides — 1.6mm across the central three-quarters is the legal limit, and most testers fail at 1.6mm without argument.
Derived from the DVSA failure strings testers recorded for the Volvo XC40 R-Design T4. A check that finds nothing means the item is likely fine, not that the test is guaranteed.
94.0% of the 4,980 recorded Volvo XC40 R-Design T4 MOT tests ended in a pass, +13.0 percentage points above the national average. 93.7% of those passed on the first attempt.
2022 is the strongest Volvo XC40 R-Design T4 year on record at 94.5%, while 2020 is the weakest at 93.2%. The year-by-year table below lists every model year with at least 50 recorded tests.
The most recorded Volvo XC40 R-Design T4 failures are "Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view" and "Has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords" — together around 4% of tests, mostly in the Visibility section.