Pass rate, every year
4,196 tests across 3 model years, 2020–2022.
+12.0 pts vs the national average
Pass rate, every year
4,196 tests across 3 model years, 2020–2022.
+12.0 pts vs the national average
Best year to buy
2022 96.1%
The strongest of the 3 years on record. See the 2022 page →
Worst year to buy
2020 92.5%
3.6 points below the 2022 peak. See the 2020 page →
The Volvo XC40 R-Design T5 MOT pass rate is 93.0%, +12.0 percentage points above the UK average. That is 4,196 DVSA MOT tests recorded between 2020 and 2022. This page lists the most common Volvo XC40 R-Design T5 MOT failures by category, names the best and worst model years, and finishes with a pre-MOT checklist you can run at home.
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Volvo XC40 R-Design T5 MOT pass rates does in your corner of the country.
The Volvo XC40 R-Design T5 passed on its first attempt in 92.5%, and its overall record sits +12.0 percentage points above the national average for all cars. These figures come from every recorded DVSA MOT test for the Volvo XC40 R-Design T5 in the 2023–2025 data: 4,196 tests across 3 model years (2020–2022). A test still carries exactly one pass or fail verdict.
| Measure | This model |
|---|---|
| Tests analysed | 4,196 |
| Overall pass rate | 93.0% |
| Passed on first attempt | 92.5% |
| Average mileage at test | 41,478 mi |
| Model years covered | 2020–2022 (3 years) |
| Versus UK national average | +12.0 pts above |
Figures are computed from every recorded DVSA test for this model in the 2023–2025 data.
Every MOT failure a tester records belongs to one inspection section of the DVSA manual. For the Volvo XC40 R-Design T5, the Visibility section leads the record — the breakdown below shows where the recorded failures cluster, then the exact strings behind the three biggest sections.
| Inspection section | Share of failures |
|---|---|
| Visibility | 47% |
| Tyres | 34% |
| Body, chassis, structure | 11% |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 5% |
| Brakes | 2% |
| Identification of the vehicle | 0% |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 0% |
| Suspension | 0% |
Shares are over the Volvo XC40 R-Design T5's recorded defect strings, merged across its year pages.
Around 47% of the recorded Volvo XC40 R-Design T5 failures fall in the Visibility section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view" (2.6%), "Wipers blade defective" (1.2%), "Wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively" (0.7%) among the Volvo XC40 R-Design T5's visibility faults.
Around 34% of the recorded Volvo XC40 R-Design T5 failures fall in the Tyres section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords" (1.8%), "Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm" (1.0%), "Has ply or cords exposed" (0.5%) among the Volvo XC40 R-Design T5's tyres faults.
Around 11% of the recorded Volvo XC40 R-Design T5 failures fall in the Body, chassis, structure section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt" (0.6%), "Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated" (0.5%) among the Volvo XC40 R-Design T5's body, chassis, structure faults.
The descriptions below are the exact DVSA failure strings testers recorded most often for the Volvo XC40 R-Design T5, each with how many of the model's 4,196 tests it was noted on.
The strongest Volvo XC40 R-Design T5 model year on record is 2022 (96.1% across 279 tests), and the weakest is 2020 (92.5%). The gap between them is 3.6 points. Years with fewer than 50 recorded tests are excluded, so these are the years with enough MOT history to mean something.
Volvo XC40 R-Design T5 reliability is improving in the DVSA data — the pass rate moves about 1.8 points a year across the most recent model years shown above.
| Year | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| 2022 XC40 R-Design T5 | 279 | 96.1% |
| 2021 XC40 R-Design T5 | 1,408 | 93.4% |
| 2020 XC40 R-Design T5 | 2,509 | 92.5% |
Newest model year first. Only years with at least 50 recorded tests are listed.
These checks follow this Volvo XC40 R-Design T5's own most-recorded failure strings, starting with what a tester is most likely to flag on a Volvo XC40 R-Design T5.
the windscreen — “windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
the wipers and washers — “wipers blade defective”
Run the wipers with the screen wet: they should clear it in one sweep without smearing or juddering. Top the washer bottle up and check both jets hit the screen.
the tyre tread — “tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm”
Check all four tyres cold, including the inner shoulder where wear hides — 1.6mm across the central three-quarters is the legal limit, and most testers fail at 1.6mm without argument.
Derived from the DVSA failure strings testers recorded for the Volvo XC40 R-Design T5. A check that finds nothing means the item is likely fine, not that the test is guaranteed.
93.0% of the 4,196 recorded Volvo XC40 R-Design T5 MOT tests ended in a pass, +12.0 percentage points above the national average. 92.5% of those passed on the first attempt.
2022 is the strongest Volvo XC40 R-Design T5 year on record at 96.1%, while 2020 is the weakest at 92.5%. The year-by-year table below lists every model year with at least 50 recorded tests.
The most recorded Volvo XC40 R-Design T5 failures are "Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view" and "Has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords" — together around 4% of tests, mostly in the Visibility section.