2001 Hyundai Amica MOT pass rate

Pass rate

70.3%

Below average — 3.0 pts behind the 73.3% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 1,285 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £44–£131

Which year to buy

  • Best 2008 76.2% pass
  • Avoid 2000 67.7% pass

Across the 7 years on record, a spread of 8.5 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
60.9%
Typical mileage
54k mi

The 2001 Hyundai Amica MOT pass rate is 70.3% of its MOT tests — 3.0 points behind what its age and mileage predict. Brakes is the biggest single reason it fails, at 24.1% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2001 Hyundai Amica on the real record

70.3% of 2001 Hyundai Amica MOTs passed — 1,285 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Check your postcode

MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Hyundai Amica does in your corner of the country.

How one model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Expert verdict

Body & chassis: 2.0× the national share

Body & chassis accounts for 10.9% of everything recorded on the 2001 Hyundai Amica, against 5.6% nationally — 5.3 points above. Brakes are still the single largest share at 24.1%, but at 20.9% nationally that one is ordinary. Look underneath for corrosion near the jacking points and suspension mounts; surface rust is normal, flaking metal is not.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Hyundai Amica? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2001 Hyundai Amica compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 73.3%, so this figure is 3.0 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 60.9%. The median 2001 Hyundai Amica in this dataset had covered 54,245 mi.

Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 71.2% of the time, April–September 69.1%.

The single most recorded failure item is "Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated", noted on 9.11% of tests.

  • 1,285 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 70.3% overall pass rate, 60.9% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Hyundai Amica, the average is 73.6% — best year 2008 (76.2%), worst 2000 (67.7%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
1,285
Typical mileage (median)
54,245 mi
Make and model
Hyundai Amica
Updated
2026-11-05

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Body Panel Repair

Typically a garage job — get quotes before committing.

Does mileage affect the Amica MOT pass rate?

0-30k 84.3%
30-60k 69.8%
60-90k 69.2%
90-120k 63.1%
120k+ 68.0%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 55% so small gaps stay visible.

Regional pass rates for the Amica

Region Tests Pass rate
South East 335 74.3%
South West 189 65.6%
East of England 182 70.9%
North West 136 68.4%
East Midlands 123 67.5%
West Midlands 116 69.0%
Yorkshire 88 65.9%
London 43 79.1%
Wales 38 73.7%
Scotland 15 66.7%

Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.

What fails a 2001 Amica

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Brakes 24.1%
+3.2 pts vs national national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Suspension 17.3%
−3.7 pts vs national national 21.0% Price suspension parts
Lamps & electrics 15.4%
+3.2 pts vs national national 12.2% Order bulbs & wipers
Tyres 11.6%
−8.2 pts vs national national 19.8% Compare tyre prices
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Body & chassis 10.9%
  • Emissions & leaks 9.5%
  • Identification 3.8%
  • Visibility 3.7%
  • Steering 1.5%
  • Advisories 1.3%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2001 Hyundai Amica tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2001 Amica

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check the lights 7.4% of tests

    “headlamp lens slightly defective”

    Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.

  2. Check the suspension joints 4.8% of tests

    “ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”

    With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.

  3. Check the battery 3.2% of tests

    “battery(ies) insecure”

    Check the battery is secure and its terminals are clean and tight — a loose battery is a fail on its own, and a weak one shows up as slow cranking on a cold morning.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2001 Amica through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £44–£131 — and 29% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£44–£131
Cheapest common item: registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the…
£5–£20
Dearest common item: joints constant velocity boot severely…
£80–£250
Common items a careful owner can do at home
60%
Repairs that still cost under £30
29%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 1,285 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the Amica, side by side

7 model years on record, from 2000 to 2008. Across them the pass rate runs from 67.7% to 76.2% — a spread of 8.5 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2000 67.7% ball joint dust cover severely…
  2. 2001 70.3%
    joints constant velocity boot…
  3. 2002 70.3% joints constant velocity boot…
  4. 2003 69.2% joints constant velocity boot…
  5. 2006 73.1% registration plate lamp(s)…
  6. 2007 74.9% registration plate lamp(s)…
  7. 2008 76.2% registration plate lamp(s)…

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2001 Hyundai Amica with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2001 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2001 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2001 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2001 Hyundai Amica 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 4,169 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Brakes 1,015 24.10% 20.89% +3.21
Suspension 726 17.30% 20.98% −3.68
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 648 15.40% 12.21% +3.19
Tyres 487 11.60% 19.76% −8.16
Body, chassis, structure 460 10.90% 5.57% +5.33
Noise, emissions and leaks 401 9.50% 5.52% +3.98
Identification of the vehicle 159 3.80% 1.76% +2.04
Visibility 155 3.70% 4.97% −1.27
Steering 65 1.50% 2.57% −1.07
Non-component advisories 53 1.30% 4.18% −2.88

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 1,285 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure Minor 9.1% £80–250 Body Panel Repair →
Headlamp lens slightly defective Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 7.4% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body, chassis, structure Major 6.6% £80–250 Body Panel Repair →
Service brake imbalance across an axle Brakes Major 4.9% £45–110 Brake Discs and Pads Set →
Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension Minor 4.8% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 4.0% £30–80 Headlight Alignment →
Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 4.0% £5–20 Number Plate Lamp →
Door condition cannot be opened from outside the vehicle Body, chassis, structure Major 3.7% £80–250 Body Panel Repair →
Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 3.7% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Battery(ies) insecure but not likely to fall from carrier Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 3.2% £60–140 Battery →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes Advisory 27.8% £80–180
Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks Advisory 23.1% £200–700
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Advisory 17.8% £45–95
Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres Advisory 12.8% £45–95
Registration plates inscription illegible Identification of the vehicle Advisory 11.0% £20–80
Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes Advisory 10.3% £45–110

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
0-30k 108 84.3% 21,920 mi
30-60k 665 69.8% 46,098 mi
60-90k 383 69.2% 72,015 mi
90-120k 103 63.1% 101,994 mi
120k+ 25 68.0% 130,532 mi

Source: 1,285 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2001 Amica MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2001 Hyundai Amica?

70.3% of the 1,285 2001 Hyundai Amica tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 73.3% for cars first used in 2001. First-attempt pass rate: 60.9%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2001 Hyundai Amica?

The three most recorded items are joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (9.11%), headlamp lens slightly defective (7.39%), joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (6.61%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2001 Hyundai Amica MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 84.3% of the time, falling to 68.0% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2001 Hyundai Amica in this dataset had covered 54,245 mi.

Does the season affect the 2001 Hyundai Amica MOT pass rate?

Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 71.2% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 69.1%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.