Pass rate
73.9%
Below average — 0.8 pts behind the 74.7% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 981 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £31–£91
2010 Hyundai Tucson MOT pass rate
- 2010
- typical 97,856 mi
Most common fault
Brakes
24.2% of faults · 20.9% nationally
mostly worn pads and discs, corroded pipes and a handbrake that will not hold.
Which year to buy
- Best 2024 95.4% pass
- Avoid 2006 68.6% pass
Across the 17 years on record, a spread of 26.8 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 65.4%
- Typical mileage
- 98k mi
The 2010 Hyundai Tucson MOT pass rate is 73.9% of its MOT tests — about what its age and mileage predict. Brakes is the biggest single reason it fails, at 24.2% of what testers record.
Check your postcode
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Hyundai Tucson does in your corner of the country.
Expert verdict
Fewer problems with tyres
Tyres are 12.8% of this car’s recorded faults, against 19.8% nationally — the mirror image of the usual story on a car of this age.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a Hyundai Tucson? Get an email when these numbers change .
How does the 2010 Hyundai Tucson compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 74.7%, so this figure is 0.8 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 65.4%. The median 2010 Hyundai Tucson in this dataset had covered 97,856 mi.
77% of the tests on this vehicle ran on Diesel, which passed 74.9% of the time. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 74.0% of the time, April–September 73.7%.
The single most recorded failure item is "Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources", noted on 9.68% of tests.
- 981 recorded tests behind this page.
- 73.9% overall pass rate, 65.4% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the Hyundai Tucson, the average is 87.0% — best year 2024 (95.4%), worst 2006 (68.6%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 981
- Typical mileage (median)
- 97,856 mi
- Make and model
- Hyundai Tucson
- Updated
- 2026-11-05
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Number Plate Lamp
Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.
Does mileage affect the Tucson MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 58% so small gaps stay visible.
Fuel type and reliability
Pass rate by fuel type. Diesel is the most common here (77% of tests).
Regional pass rates for the Tucson
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| South East | 176 | 77.3% |
| South West | 155 | 69.0% |
| East of England | 125 | 76.8% |
| North West | 100 | 73.0% |
| Yorkshire | 93 | 77.4% |
| West Midlands | 91 | 72.5% |
| North East | 75 | 73.3% |
| East Midlands | 53 | 66.0% |
| Scotland | 52 | 63.5% |
| Wales | 35 | 82.9% |
| London | 26 | 88.5% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2010 Tucson
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2010 Tucson
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the lights 9.7% of tests
“registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
-
Check the suspension joints 3.5% of tests
“ball joint excessively worn”
With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.
-
Check the windscreen 3.5% of tests
“windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2010 Tucson through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £31–£91 — and 49% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £31–£91
- Cheapest common item: washers provides insufficient washer liquid
- £5–£15
- Dearest common item: joints constant velocity boot severely…
- £80–£250
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 70%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 49%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 981 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the Tucson, side by side
17 model years on record, from 2004 to 2024. Across them the pass rate runs from 68.6% to 95.4% — a spread of 26.8 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2004 68.8% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2005 69.7% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2006 68.6% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2007 71.2% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2008 71.6% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2009 73.5% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2010 73.9%registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2015 82.4% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
- 2016 85.0% brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick
- 2017 86.1% brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick
- 2018 88.2% brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick
- 2019 89.3% brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick
- 2020 89.6% wipers does not clear the…
- 2021 91.5% wipers does not clear the…
- 2022 92.2% wipers does not clear the…
- 2023 94.3% windscreen damaged but not…
- 2024 95.4% has a cut in excess of the…
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2010 Hyundai Tucson with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2010 cars with a similar record
- Volvo C30 73.9%
- Mercedes-Benz B-Class 74.0%
- Peugeot Rcz 73.8%
- Subaru Forester 73.8%
- Ford S-Max 74.1%
- Vauxhall Corsa 73.7%
Closest pass rates among 2010 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2010 Hyundai Tucson 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 2,614 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brakes | 636 | 24.20% | 20.89% | +3.31 |
| Suspension | 540 | 20.50% | 20.98% | −0.48 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 341 | 13.00% | 12.21% | +0.79 |
| Tyres | 336 | 12.80% | 19.76% | −6.96 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 233 | 8.90% | 5.57% | +3.33 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 139 | 5.30% | 5.52% | −0.22 |
| Steering | 127 | 4.80% | 2.57% | +2.23 |
| Visibility | 125 | 4.70% | 4.97% | −0.27 |
| Non-component advisories | 106 | 4.00% | 4.18% | −0.18 |
| Identification of the vehicle | 31 | 1.20% | 1.76% | −0.56 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 9.7% | £5–20 |
| Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 4.2% | £5–25 |
| Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure | Minor | 3.8% | £80–250 |
| Ball joint excessively worn Suspension | Major | 3.5% | £18–45 |
| Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility | Minor | 3.5% | £80–200 |
| Joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body, chassis, structure | Major | 3.3% | £80–250 |
| Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements Brakes | Major | 3.2% | £45–110 |
| Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Rectified | 2.5% | £5–25 |
| Linkage ball joints ball joint excessively worn Suspension | Major | 2.1% | £18–45 |
| Washers provides insufficient washer liquid Visibility | Major | 2.1% | £5–15 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres | Advisory | 19.3% | £45–95 |
| Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes | Advisory | 17.1% | £45–110 |
| Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes | Advisory | 14.6% | £80–180 |
| Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | Advisory | 13.6% | £40–150 |
| Exhaust system has a major leak of exhaust gases Body, chassis, structure | Advisory | 10.9% | £45–120 |
| Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks | Advisory | 10.0% | £200–700 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30k | 3 | 66.7% | 24,452 mi |
| 30-60k | 84 | 79.8% | 49,602 mi |
| 60-90k | 295 | 76.9% | 77,016 mi |
| 90-120k | 351 | 72.1% | 103,799 mi |
| 120k+ | 248 | 71.0% | 143,066 mi |
Source: 981 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2010 Tucson MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2010 Hyundai Tucson?
73.9% of the 981 2010 Hyundai Tucson tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 74.7% for cars first used in 2010. First-attempt pass rate: 65.4%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2010 Hyundai Tucson?
The three most recorded items are registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (9.68%), position lamp not working (4.18%), joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (3.77%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2010 Hyundai Tucson MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 66.7% of the time, falling to 71.0% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2010 Hyundai Tucson in this dataset had covered 97,856 mi.
Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2010 Hyundai Tucson?
Diesel: 74.9% pass rate across 758 tests. Petrol: 70.4% pass rate across 223 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.
Does the season affect the 2010 Hyundai Tucson MOT pass rate?
Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 74.0% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 73.7%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.