Mitsubishi Space Star MOT Pass Rate & Official DVSA Failure Statistics

Pass rate, every year

64.8% Below average

5,797 tests across 6 model years, 2000–2005.

−16.2 pts vs the national average

MOT PASS RATES

How the Mitsubishi Space Star really fares

64.8% of its MOTs pass — over 5,797 class-4 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rates

Every figure on this page comes from the DVSA's MOT test record.

The Mitsubishi Space Star MOT pass rate is 64.8%, −16.2 percentage points below the UK average. That is 5,797 DVSA MOT tests recorded between 2000 and 2005. This page lists the most common Mitsubishi Space Star MOT failures by category, names the best and worst model years, and finishes with a pre-MOT checklist you can run at home.

Check your postcode

MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Mitsubishi Space Star MOT pass rates does in your corner of the country.

How one model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Mitsubishi Space Star MOT History and Failure Rates vs UK National Average

The Mitsubishi Space Star passed on its first attempt in 52.4%, and its overall record sits −16.2 percentage points below the national average for all cars. These figures come from every recorded DVSA MOT test for the Mitsubishi Space Star in the 2023–2025 data: 5,797 tests across 6 model years (2000–2005). A test still carries exactly one pass or fail verdict.

MeasureThis model
Tests analysed5,797
Overall pass rate64.8%
Passed on first attempt52.4%
Average mileage at test87,013 mi
Model years covered2000–2005 (6 years)
Versus UK national average−16.2 pts below

Figures are computed from every recorded DVSA test for this model in the 2023–2025 data.

Most Common Mitsubishi Space Star MOT Problems by Failure Category

Every MOT failure a tester records belongs to one inspection section of the DVSA manual. For the Mitsubishi Space Star, the Suspension section leads the record — the breakdown below shows where the recorded failures cluster, then the exact strings behind the three biggest sections.

Inspection section Share of failures Est. recorded instances
Suspension 31% 1,137
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 26% 933
Body, chassis, structure 20% 711
Steering 10% 365
Brakes 9% 334
Visibility 4% 154
Noise, emissions and leaks 0% 3

Shares are over the Mitsubishi Space Star's recorded defect strings, merged across its year pages.

Suspension

Around 31% of the recorded Mitsubishi Space Star failures fall in the Suspension section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength" (9.3%), "Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated" (9.3%), "Ball joint excessively worn" (0.9%) among the Mitsubishi Space Star's suspension faults.

Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment

Around 26% of the recorded Mitsubishi Space Star failures fall in the Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Headlamp lens slightly defective" (7.1%), "Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources" (4.6%), "Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect" (4.4%) among the Mitsubishi Space Star's lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment faults.

Body, chassis, structure

Around 20% of the recorded Mitsubishi Space Star failures fall in the Body, chassis, structure section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated" (6.6%), "Joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt" (5.6%) among the Mitsubishi Space Star's body, chassis, structure faults.

Top Recorded Mitsubishi Space Star DVSA MOT Test Statistics & Defect Descriptions

The descriptions below are the exact DVSA failure strings testers recorded most often for the Mitsubishi Space Star, each with how many of the model's 5,797 tests it was noted on.

  • "Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength" (Major) — noted on about 541 Mitsubishi Space Star tests, 9.3% of the model's MOT record.
  • "Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated" (Minor) — noted on about 541 Mitsubishi Space Star tests, 9.3% of the model's MOT record.
  • "Headlamp lens slightly defective" (Minor) — noted on about 410 Mitsubishi Space Star tests, 7.1% of the model's MOT record.
  • "Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated" (Minor) — noted on about 384 Mitsubishi Space Star tests, 6.6% of the model's MOT record.
  • "Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt" (Minor) — noted on about 361 Mitsubishi Space Star tests, 6.2% of the model's MOT record.
  • "Joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt" (Major) — noted on about 327 Mitsubishi Space Star tests, 5.6% of the model's MOT record.

Best and Worst Mitsubishi Space Star Model Years by Pass Rate

The strongest Mitsubishi Space Star model year on record is 2000 (66.3% across 86 tests), and the weakest is 2003 (63.7%). The gap between them is 2.6 points. Years with fewer than 50 recorded tests are excluded, so these are the years with enough MOT history to mean something.

Year Tests Pass rate First attempt Avg mileage Most common failure
2005 Space Star 1,195 64.9% 52.6% 86,445 mi Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated
2004 Space Star 1,970 64.7% 52.4% 88,705 mi Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area
2003 Space Star 1,288 63.7% 50.6% 88,887 mi Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area
2002 Space Star 889 66.1% 54.0% 86,319 mi Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated
2001 Space Star 369 66.1% 54.2% 90,181 mi Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated
2000 Space Star 86 66.3% 49.1% 81,542 mi Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or dete

Newest model year first. Only years with at least 50 recorded tests are listed.

Pre-MOT Inspection Checklist for Mitsubishi Space Star Owners

These checks follow this Mitsubishi Space Star's own most-recorded failure strings, starting with what a tester is most likely to flag on a Mitsubishi Space Star.

  • corrosion — “component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength”

    Look under the sills, around the jacking points and where the suspension mounts meet the body. Flaking, holed or crumbly metal fails; a brown stain on sound metal does not.

  • the suspension joints — “ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”

    With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.

  • the lights — “headlamp lens slightly defective”

    Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.

Derived from the DVSA failure strings testers recorded for the Mitsubishi Space Star. A check that finds nothing means the item is likely fine, not that the test is guaranteed.

Frequently Asked Questions: Mitsubishi Space Star MOT & Reliability

What is the Mitsubishi Space Star MOT pass rate?

64.8% of the 5,797 recorded Mitsubishi Space Star MOT tests ended in a pass, −16.2 percentage points below the national average. 52.4% of those passed on the first attempt.

Which Mitsubishi Space Star model years pass the MOT most often?

2000 is the strongest Mitsubishi Space Star year on record at 66.3%, while 2003 is the weakest at 63.7%. The year-by-year table below lists every model year with at least 50 recorded tests.

What are the most common Mitsubishi Space Star MOT failures?

The most recorded Mitsubishi Space Star failures are "Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength" and "Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated" — together around 19% of tests, mostly in the Suspension section.