Pass rate, every year
1,885 tests across 8 model years, 2005–2012.
−12.4 pts vs the national average
Pass rate, every year
1,885 tests across 8 model years, 2005–2012.
−12.4 pts vs the national average
Best year to buy
2010 71.9%
The strongest of the 8 years on record. See the 2010 page →
Worst year to buy
2012 66.0%
5.9 points below the 2010 peak. See the 2012 page →
The Proton Gen-2 MOT pass rate is 68.6%, −12.4 percentage points below the UK average. That is 1,885 DVSA MOT tests recorded between 2005 and 2012. This page lists the most common Proton Gen-2 MOT failures by category, names the best and worst model years, and finishes with a pre-MOT checklist you can run at home.
The Proton Gen-2 passed on its first attempt in 59.6%, and its overall record sits −12.4 percentage points below the national average for all cars. These figures come from every recorded DVSA MOT test for the Proton Gen-2 in the 2023–2025 data: 1,885 tests across 8 model years (2005–2012). A test still carries exactly one pass or fail verdict.
| Measure | This model |
|---|---|
| Tests analysed | 1,885 |
| Overall pass rate | 68.6% |
| Passed on first attempt | 59.6% |
| Average mileage at test | 69,884 mi |
| Model years covered | 2005–2012 (8 years) |
| Versus UK national average | −12.4 pts below |
Figures are computed from every recorded DVSA test for this model in the 2023–2025 data.
Every MOT failure a tester records belongs to one inspection section of the DVSA manual. For the Proton Gen-2, the Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment section leads the record — the breakdown below shows where the recorded failures cluster, then the exact strings behind the three biggest sections.
| Inspection section | Share of failures |
|---|---|
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 37% |
| Suspension | 21% |
| Brakes | 18% |
| Body, chassis, structure | 9% |
| Visibility | 9% |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 6% |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 1% |
Shares are over the Proton Gen-2's recorded defect strings, merged across its year pages.
Around 37% of the recorded Proton Gen-2 failures fall in the Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources" (5.3%), "Battery(ies) insecure but not likely to fall from carrier" (3.4%), "Position lamp not working" (3.0%) among the Proton Gen-2's lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment faults.
Around 21% of the recorded Proton Gen-2 failures fall in the Suspension section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated" (5.8%), "Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength" (1.6%), "Linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated" (1.2%) among the Proton Gen-2's suspension faults.
Around 18% of the recorded Proton Gen-2 failures fall in the Brakes section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements" (6.7%), "Parking brake performance inoperative on one side" (1.9%) among the Proton Gen-2's brakes faults.
The descriptions below are the exact DVSA failure strings testers recorded most often for the Proton Gen-2, each with how many of the model's 1,885 tests it was noted on.
The strongest Proton Gen-2 model year on record is 2010 (71.9% across 285 tests), and the weakest is 2012 (66.0%). The gap between them is 5.9 points. Years with fewer than 50 recorded tests are excluded, so these are the years with enough MOT history to mean something.
| Year | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| 2012 Gen-2 | 100 | 66.0% |
| 2011 Gen-2 | 206 | 70.4% |
| 2010 Gen-2 | 285 | 71.9% |
| 2009 Gen-2 | 231 | 71.0% |
| 2008 Gen-2 | 336 | 67.0% |
| 2007 Gen-2 | 374 | 67.6% |
| 2006 Gen-2 | 210 | 66.2% |
| 2005 Gen-2 | 143 | 67.8% |
Newest model year first. Only years with at least 50 recorded tests are listed.
These checks follow this Proton Gen-2's own most-recorded failure strings, starting with what a tester is most likely to flag on a Proton Gen-2.
the suspension joints — “ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”
With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.
the lights — “registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
the battery — “battery(ies) insecure”
Check the battery is secure and its terminals are clean and tight — a loose battery is a fail on its own, and a weak one shows up as slow cranking on a cold morning.
Derived from the DVSA failure strings testers recorded for the Proton Gen-2. A check that finds nothing means the item is likely fine, not that the test is guaranteed.
68.6% of the 1,885 recorded Proton Gen-2 MOT tests ended in a pass, −12.4 percentage points below the national average. 59.6% of those passed on the first attempt.
2010 is the strongest Proton Gen-2 year on record at 71.9%, while 2012 is the weakest at 66.0%. The year-by-year table below lists every model year with at least 50 recorded tests.
The most recorded Proton Gen-2 failures are "Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements" and "Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated" — together around 13% of tests, mostly in the Brakes section.