Pass rate
73.1%
Below average — 0.7 pts behind the 73.8% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 134 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £42–£133
2000 SEAT Toledo MOT pass rate
- 2000
- typical 131,792 mi
Most common fault
Suspension
23.0% of faults · 21.0% nationally
mostly worn arm bushes, split ball-joint boots and broken coil springs.
Which year to buy
- Best 2019 87.6% pass
- Avoid 2005 68.3% pass
Across the 17 years on record, a spread of 19.3 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 65.7%
- Typical mileage
- 132k mi
The 2000 SEAT Toledo MOT pass rate is 73.1% of its MOT tests — about what its age and mileage predict. Suspension is the biggest single reason it fails, at 23.0% of what testers record.
Check your postcode
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how SEAT Toledo does in your corner of the country.
Expert verdict
Fewer problems with tyres
Tyres are 7.5% of this car’s recorded faults, against 19.8% nationally — the mirror image of the usual story on a car of this age.
- When it fails, it costs. Only 32% of this model’s typical repairs come in under £30 in parts — the failures here tend to be the kind that need a garage rather than a bulb.
- Based on a small sample. 134 tests back this page. That is enough to publish and to index, not enough to treat the decimal places as precise — read the pattern, not the second digit.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a SEAT Toledo? Get an email when these numbers change .
How does the 2000 SEAT Toledo compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 73.8%, so this figure is 0.7 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 65.7%. The median 2000 SEAT Toledo in this dataset had covered 131,792 mi.
The most common fuel recorded here is Petrol — 61% of tests, with a 72.0% pass rate. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 78.5% of the time, April–September 65.5%.
The single most recorded failure item is "Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view", noted on 5.22% of tests.
- 134 recorded tests behind this page.
- 73.1% overall pass rate, 65.7% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the SEAT Toledo, the average is 79.2% — best year 2019 (87.6%), worst 2005 (68.3%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 134
- Typical mileage (median)
- 131,792 mi
- Make and model
- SEAT Toledo
- Updated
- 2026-11-05
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Windscreen
Typically a garage job — get quotes before committing.
Does mileage affect the Toledo MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 61% so small gaps stay visible.
Fuel type and reliability
Pass rate by fuel type. Petrol is the most common here (61% of tests).
Regional pass rates for the Toledo
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| South East | 47 | 72.3% |
| South West | 25 | 76.0% |
| East of England | 18 | 66.7% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2000 Toledo
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2000 Toledo
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the windscreen 5.2% of tests
“windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
-
Check the lights 3.7% of tests
“headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
-
Check the exhaust and emissions 3.0% of tests
“catalyst emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle exceeds manufacturer's specified limits”
Listen for a blow at idle and have someone rev it gently. Then look at the tailpipe smoke: blue is oil, white when warm is coolant, black is over-fuelling. Any of those and the emissions test is the least of it.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2000 Toledo through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £42–£133 — and 32% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £42–£133
- Cheapest common item: washers provides insufficient washer liquid
- £5–£15
- Dearest common item: joints constant velocity boot severely…
- £80–£250
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 50%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 32%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 134 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the Toledo, side by side
17 model years on record, from 2000 to 2019. Across them the pass rate runs from 68.3% to 87.6% — a spread of 19.3 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2000 73.1%windscreen damaged but not…
- 2001 73.8% pins and bushes pin or bush…
- 2002 70.0% windscreen damaged but not…
- 2003 74.7% windscreen damaged but not…
- 2004 75.7% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2005 68.3% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2006 69.6% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2007 68.3% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2008 68.5% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2012 76.0% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2013 76.9% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2014 80.2% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2015 79.4% pins and bushes pin or bush…
- 2016 80.7% pins and bushes pin or bush…
- 2017 82.1% pins and bushes pin or bush…
- 2018 84.1% pins and bushes pin or bush…
- 2019 87.6% has a cut in excess of the…
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2000 SEAT Toledo with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2000 cars with a similar record
- Mazda Mx-5 73.2%
- Suzuki Jimny 72.9%
- Volvo V70 72.8%
- Toyota MR2 73.4%
- Volkswagen Lupo 73.4%
- Ford Puma 73.4%
Closest pass rates among 2000 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2000 SEAT Toledo 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 463 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 108 | 23.00% | 20.98% | +2.02 |
| Brakes | 108 | 23.00% | 20.89% | +2.11 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 59 | 12.60% | 12.21% | +0.39 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 45 | 9.60% | 5.57% | +4.03 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 41 | 8.70% | 5.52% | +3.18 |
| Tyres | 35 | 7.50% | 19.76% | −12.26 |
| Non-component advisories | 29 | 6.20% | 4.18% | +2.02 |
| Visibility | 17 | 3.60% | 4.97% | −1.37 |
| Identification of the vehicle | 11 | 2.30% | 1.76% | +0.54 |
| Steering | 10 | 2.10% | 2.57% | −0.47 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility | Minor | 5.2% | £80–200 |
| Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure | Minor | 4.5% | £80–250 |
| Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 3.7% | £30–80 |
| Catalyst emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle exceeds manufacturer's specified limits Noise, emissions and leaks | Major | 3.0% | £60–250 |
| Washers provides insufficient washer liquid Visibility | Major | 3.0% | £5–15 |
| Brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes | Major | 2.2% | £18–45 |
| Catalyst emissions carbon monoxide content at idle exceeds manufacturer's specified limits Noise, emissions and leaks | Major | 2.2% | £60–250 |
| Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Rectified | 2.2% | £5–25 |
| Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 2.2% | £5–20 |
| Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 2.2% | £5–20 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes | Advisory | 25.4% | £80–180 |
| Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | Advisory | 23.1% | £40–150 |
| Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks | Advisory | 20.9% | £200–700 |
| Non-component advisories Play in steering rack inner joint(s) Non-component advisories | Advisory | 19.4% | £120–300 |
| Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes | Advisory | 14.2% | £45–110 |
| Coil spring corroded so that its cross sectional area is reduced and seriously weakened Suspension | Advisory | 14.2% | £25–65 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30k | 3 | 100.0% | 20,092 mi |
| 30-60k | 19 | 73.7% | 50,863 mi |
| 60-90k | 9 | 77.8% | 82,731 mi |
| 90-120k | 18 | 77.8% | 106,611 mi |
| 120k+ | 83 | 69.9% | 161,563 mi |
Source: 134 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2000 Toledo MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2000 SEAT Toledo?
73.1% of the 134 2000 SEAT Toledo tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 73.8% for cars first used in 2000. First-attempt pass rate: 65.7%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2000 SEAT Toledo?
The three most recorded items are windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (5.22%), joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (4.48%), headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (3.73%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2000 SEAT Toledo MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 100.0% of the time, falling to 69.9% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2000 SEAT Toledo in this dataset had covered 131,792 mi.
Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2000 SEAT Toledo?
Petrol: 72.0% pass rate across 82 tests. Diesel: 75.0% pass rate across 52 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.
Does the season affect the 2000 SEAT Toledo MOT pass rate?
Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 78.5% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 65.5%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.