Pass rate, every year
808 tests across 5 model years, 2003–2007.
−2.5 pts vs the national average
Pass rate, every year
808 tests across 5 model years, 2003–2007.
−2.5 pts vs the national average
Best year to buy
2003 81.4%
The strongest of the 5 years on record. See the 2003 page →
Worst year to buy
2007 76.7%
4.7 points below the 2003 peak. See the 2007 page →
The Toyota Surf MOT pass rate is 78.5%, −2.5 percentage points below the UK average. That is 808 DVSA MOT tests recorded between 2003 and 2007. This page lists the most common Toyota Surf MOT failures by category, names the best and worst model years, and finishes with a pre-MOT checklist you can run at home.
The Toyota Surf passed on its first attempt in 73.8%, and its overall record sits −2.5 percentage points below the national average for all cars. These figures come from every recorded DVSA MOT test for the Toyota Surf in the 2023–2025 data: 808 tests across 5 model years (2003–2007). A test still carries exactly one pass or fail verdict.
| Measure | This model |
|---|---|
| Tests analysed | 808 |
| Overall pass rate | 78.5% |
| Passed on first attempt | 73.8% |
| Average mileage at test | 185,352 mi |
| Model years covered | 2003–2007 (5 years) |
| Versus UK national average | −2.5 pts below |
Figures are computed from every recorded DVSA test for this model in the 2023–2025 data.
Every MOT failure a tester records belongs to one inspection section of the DVSA manual. For the Toyota Surf, the Body, chassis, structure section leads the record — the breakdown below shows where the recorded failures cluster, then the exact strings behind the three biggest sections.
| Inspection section | Share of failures |
|---|---|
| Body, chassis, structure | 25% |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 23% |
| Suspension | 18% |
| Brakes | 15% |
| Visibility | 10% |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 5% |
| Steering | 2% |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 1% |
Shares are over the Toyota Surf's recorded defect strings, merged across its year pages.
Around 25% of the recorded Toyota Surf failures fall in the Body, chassis, structure section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated" (5.2%), "Joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt" (2.5%), "Exhaust system has a major leak of exhaust gases" (1.6%) among the Toyota Surf's body, chassis, structure faults.
Around 23% of the recorded Toyota Surf failures fall in the Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources" (3.1%), "Rear fog lamp not working" (3.1%), "Battery(ies) insecure but not likely to fall from carrier" (1.7%) among the Toyota Surf's lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment faults.
Around 18% of the recorded Toyota Surf failures fall in the Suspension section of the MOT inspection manual. Testers recorded "Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated" (4.6%), "Ball joint excessively worn" (1.4%), "Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn" (0.6%) among the Toyota Surf's suspension faults.
The descriptions below are the exact DVSA failure strings testers recorded most often for the Toyota Surf, each with how many of the model's 808 tests it was noted on.
The strongest Toyota Surf model year on record is 2003 (81.4% across 167 tests), and the weakest is 2007 (76.7%). The gap between them is 4.7 points. Years with fewer than 50 recorded tests are excluded, so these are the years with enough MOT history to mean something.
Toyota Surf reliability is declining in the DVSA data — the pass rate moves about 1.1 points a year across the most recent model years shown above.
| Year | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| 2007 Surf | 60 | 76.7% |
| 2006 Surf | 139 | 77.0% |
| 2005 Surf | 226 | 77.9% |
| 2004 Surf | 216 | 78.2% |
| 2003 Surf | 167 | 81.4% |
Newest model year first. Only years with at least 50 recorded tests are listed.
These checks follow this Toyota Surf's own most-recorded failure strings, starting with what a tester is most likely to flag on a Toyota Surf.
the suspension joints — “ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”
With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.
the windscreen — “windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
the lights — “registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
Derived from the DVSA failure strings testers recorded for the Toyota Surf. A check that finds nothing means the item is likely fine, not that the test is guaranteed.
78.5% of the 808 recorded Toyota Surf MOT tests ended in a pass, −2.5 percentage points below the national average. 73.8% of those passed on the first attempt.
2003 is the strongest Toyota Surf year on record at 81.4%, while 2007 is the weakest at 76.7%. The year-by-year table below lists every model year with at least 50 recorded tests.
The most recorded Toyota Surf failures are "Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated" and "Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated" — together around 10% of tests, mostly in the Body, chassis, structure section.