Calculate my fail sheet

2011 Toyota Vitz MOT pass rate

Check your postcode

Pass rate by postcode →

Pass rate

85.4%

Above average — 9.5 pts ahead of the 75.9% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 943 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £11–£32

Which year to buy

  • Best 2016 94.6% pass
  • Avoid 2008 79.8% pass

Across the 14 years on record, a spread of 14.8 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
83.4%
Typical mileage
53k mi

The 2011 Toyota Vitz MOT pass rate is 85.4% of its MOT tests — 9.5 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. Lamps & electrics is the biggest single reason it fails, at 26.9% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2011 Toyota Vitz on the real record

85.4% of 2011 Toyota Vitz MOTs passed — 943 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Expert verdict

Lamps & electrics: 2.2× the national share

Lamps & electrics make up 26.9% of everything recorded on the 2011 Toyota Vitz, against 12.2% nationally — 14.7 points above. Walk round the car with the lights on before the test: bulbs, indicators and number-plate lamps are the cheapest failures to prevent and among the most common.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Toyota Vitz? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2011 Toyota Vitz compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 75.9%, so this figure is 9.5 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 83.4%. The median 2011 Toyota Vitz in this dataset had covered 53,458 mi.

98% of the tests on this vehicle ran on Petrol, which passed 85.3% of the time. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 85.9% of the time, April–September 85.0%.

The single most recorded failure item is "Linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated", noted on 4.14% of tests.

  • 943 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 85.4% overall pass rate, 83.4% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Toyota Vitz, the average is 87.8% — best year 2016 (94.6%), worst 2008 (79.8%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
943
Typical mileage (median)
53,458 mi
Make and model
Toyota Vitz
Updated
2026-11-07

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Ball Joint

Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.

Does mileage affect the Vitz MOT pass rate?

0-30k 85.6%
30-60k 86.7%
60-90k 84.2%
90-120k 78.6%
120k+ 83.3%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 70% so small gaps stay visible.

Fuel type and reliability

Petrol 85.3%
Hybrid 86.7%

Pass rate by fuel type. Petrol is the most common here (98% of tests).

Where the Toyota Vitz is most common

Across all Vitz model years on record (2008–2021): 3,316 Toyota Vitz cars tested in a recordable postcode area, across 5,405 tests. Manchester (M) has the most, with 300 cars tested there. Cars are counted by the postcode area of the MOT station, so this is where they were tested, not necessarily where their owners live.

# Postcode area Cars Share of all Tests Pass rate
1 Manchester (M) 300 9% 484 92.1%
2 Birmingham (B) 293 8.8% 466 93.1%
3 Bolton (BL) 155 4.7% 237 88.6%
4 Romford (RM) 150 4.5% 219 92.7%
5 London (E) 146 4.4% 224 92.4%
6 Hayes (UB) 117 3.5% 167 92.8%
7 Ilford (IG) 90 2.7% 132 91.7%
8 Leicester (LE) 81 2.4% 145 92.4%
9 Croydon (CR) 78 2.4% 107 96.3%
10 Bradford (BD) 76 2.3% 112 92.9%
11 Wembley (HA) 75 2.3% 119 89.1%
12 London (N) 71 2.1% 100 94.0%
13 Blackburn (BB) 69 2.1% 109 97.2%
14 Oldham (OL) 67 2% 120 85.8%
15 Stoke On Trent (ST) 64 1.9% 129 85.3%
16 Luton (LU) 61 1.8% 96 89.6%
17 Leeds (LS) 57 1.7% 101 90.1%
18 Southampton (SO) 56 1.7% 86 80.2%
19 London (NW) 54 1.6% 89 86.5%
20 Slough (SL) 53 1.6% 74 91.9%

The twenty areas with the most Toyota Vitz cars in the record, sorted by car count — sort the columns for a different question. Cars tested at a station whose postcode area could not be resolved are counted in the model's total but in no area, so the shares add up to slightly under 100% even across every area, and an area's cars are a subset of the model's. Pass rate is blank below 30 tests in an area, where a percentage is noise rather than a finding. How this model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Regional pass rates for the Vitz

Region Tests Pass rate
North West 222 85.1%
West Midlands 173 86.7%
South East 153 85.6%
London 107 87.9%
East of England 77 79.2%
East Midlands 75 86.7%
Yorkshire 72 86.1%
Scotland 34 82.4%
Wales 16 87.5%

Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.

What fails a 2011 Vitz

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Lamps & electrics 26.9%
+14.7 pts vs national national 12.2% Order bulbs & wipers
Tyres 24.1%
+4.3 pts vs national national 19.8% Compare tyre prices
Suspension 19.9%
−1.1 pts vs national national 21.0% Price suspension parts
Brakes 12.9%
−8.0 pts vs national national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Visibility 6.5%
  • Advisories 3.4%
  • Body & chassis 2.3%
  • Identification 1.4%
  • Emissions & leaks 1.3%
  • Steering 0.7%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2011 Toyota Vitz tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2011 Vitz

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check the suspension joints 4.1% of tests

    “linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”

    With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.

  2. Check the lights 2.9% of tests

    “headlamp lens slightly defective”

    Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.

  3. Check the wipers and washers 1.9% of tests

    “wipers blade defective”

    Run the wipers with the screen wet: they should clear it in one sweep without smearing or juddering. Top the washer bottle up and check both jets hit the screen.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2011 Vitz through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £11–£32 — and 54% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£11–£32
Cheapest common item: rear fog lamp missing
£3–£15
Dearest common item: linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust…
£18–£45
Common items a careful owner can do at home
100%
Repairs that still cost under £30
54%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 943 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the Vitz, side by side

14 model years on record, from 2008 to 2021. Across them the pass rate runs from 79.8% to 94.6% — a spread of 14.8 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2008 79.8% linkage ball joint dust cover…
  2. 2009 84.5% linkage ball joint dust cover…
  3. 2010 83.9% headlamp lens slightly defective
  4. 2011 85.4%
    linkage ball joint dust cover…
  5. 2012 87.0% linkage ball joint dust cover…
  6. 2013 89.0% linkage ball joint dust cover…
  7. 2014 93.1% linkage ball joint dust cover…
  8. 2015 88.7% linkage ball joint dust cover…
  9. 2016 94.6% headlamp lens slightly defective
  10. 2017 91.7% wipers blade defective
  11. 2018 93.4% rear fog lamp not working
  12. 2019 86.6% headlamp lens slightly defective
  13. 2020 86.7% mirrors slightly damaged
  14. 2021 85.1% linkage ball joint dust cover…

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2011 Toyota Vitz with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2011 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2011 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2011 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2011 Toyota Vitz 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 950 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 257 26.90% 12.21% +14.69
Tyres 231 24.10% 19.76% +4.34
Suspension 190 19.90% 20.98% −1.08
Brakes 123 12.90% 20.89% −7.99
Visibility 62 6.50% 4.97% +1.53
Non-component advisories 33 3.40% 4.18% −0.78
Body, chassis, structure 22 2.30% 5.57% −3.27
Identification of the vehicle 13 1.40% 1.76% −0.36
Noise, emissions and leaks 12 1.30% 5.52% −4.22
Steering 7 0.70% 2.57% −1.87

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 943 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension Minor 4.1% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Headlamp lens slightly defective Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 2.9% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Suspension Major 2.4% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Rear fog lamp missing Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 2.2% £3–15 Bulb →
Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension Minor 2.1% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 2.1% £5–20 Number Plate Lamp →
Ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Suspension Major 2.0% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Wipers blade defective Visibility Minor 1.9% £8–22 Wiper Blade →
Wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility Major 1.9% £8–22 Wiper Blade →
Rear fog lamp does not emit a steady red light Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 1.7% £3–15 Bulb →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres Advisory 10.6% £45–95
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Advisory 8.6% £45–95
Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension Advisory 4.7% £40–150
Brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes Advisory 4.6% £18–45
Headlamp has a product on the lens so that the light output is severely reduced Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Advisory 4.3% £5–25
Parking brake efficiency (trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) efficiency below requirements Brakes Advisory 2.0% £25–80

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
0-30k 125 85.6% 21,636 mi
30-60k 452 86.7% 45,974 mi
60-90k 316 84.2% 71,251 mi
90-120k 42 78.6% 98,157 mi
120k+ 6 83.3% 134,753 mi

Source: 943 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2011 Vitz MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2011 Toyota Vitz?

85.4% of the 943 2011 Toyota Vitz tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 75.9% for cars first used in 2011. First-attempt pass rate: 83.4%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2011 Toyota Vitz?

The three most recorded items are linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (4.14%), headlamp lens slightly defective (2.86%), linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (2.44%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2011 Toyota Vitz MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 85.6% of the time, falling to 83.3% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2011 Toyota Vitz in this dataset had covered 53,458 mi.

Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2011 Toyota Vitz?

Petrol: 85.3% pass rate across 928 tests. Hybrid: 86.7% pass rate across 15 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.

Does the season affect the 2011 Toyota Vitz MOT pass rate?

Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 85.9% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 85.0%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.