2009 Alfa Romeo 159 MOT pass rate

Pass rate

70.3%

Below average — 3.7 pts behind the 74.0% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 2,811 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £46–£124

Which year to buy

  • Best 2012 74.8% pass
  • Avoid 2006 67.6% pass

Across the 7 years on record, a spread of 7.2 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
62.0%
Typical mileage
119k mi

The 2009 Alfa Romeo 159 MOT pass rate is 70.3% of its MOT tests — 3.7 points behind what its age and mileage predict. Suspension is the biggest single reason it fails, at 26.2% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2009 Alfa Romeo 159 on the real record

70.3% of 2009 Alfa Romeo 159 MOTs passed — 2,811 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Check your postcode

MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Alfa Romeo 159 does in your corner of the country.

How one model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Expert verdict

Falls short of its own age and mileage

Like-for-like, cars this age and mileage expect about 74.0%; this one manages 70.3% — 3.7 points below. Age is a fair excuse; this is not age.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Alfa Romeo 159? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2009 Alfa Romeo 159 compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 74.0%, so this figure is 3.7 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 62.0%. The median 2009 Alfa Romeo 159 in this dataset had covered 119,199 mi.

84% of the tests on this vehicle ran on Diesel, which passed 69.1% of the time. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 70.8% of the time, April–September 69.6%.

The single most recorded failure item is "Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements", noted on 7.86% of tests.

  • 2,811 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 70.3% overall pass rate, 62.0% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Alfa Romeo 159, the average is 69.9% — best year 2012 (74.8%), worst 2006 (67.6%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
2,811
Typical mileage (median)
119,199 mi
Make and model
Alfa Romeo 159
Updated
2026-11-05

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Brake Discs and Pads Set

Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.

Does mileage affect the 159 MOT pass rate?

0-30k 83.3%
30-60k 75.2%
60-90k 76.7%
90-120k 70.1%
120k+ 68.0%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 60% so small gaps stay visible.

Fuel type and reliability

Diesel 69.1%
Petrol 76.2%

Pass rate by fuel type. Diesel is the most common here (84% of tests).

Regional pass rates for the 159

Region Tests Pass rate
South East 469 74.2%
East of England 401 70.8%
South West 343 61.8%
North West 332 72.3%
West Midlands 312 72.8%
Yorkshire 265 69.1%
East Midlands 192 71.4%
Scotland 172 66.3%
North East 137 72.3%
Wales 135 64.4%
London 53 83.0%

Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.

What fails a 2009 159

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Suspension 26.2%
+5.2 pts vs national national 21.0% Price suspension parts
Brakes 19.5%
−1.4 pts vs national national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Tyres 16.5%
−3.3 pts vs national national 19.8% Compare tyre prices
Lamps & electrics 10.4%
−1.8 pts vs national national 12.2% Order bulbs & wipers
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Emissions & leaks 9.3%
  • Body & chassis 7.2%
  • Visibility 3.5%
  • Advisories 2.4%
  • Steering 2.3%
  • Identification 1.3%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2009 Alfa Romeo 159 tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2009 159

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check the coil springs 5.5% of tests

    “coil spring fractured or broken”

    Look up inside each wheel arch with a torch, all the way round the spring. A snapped spring usually breaks at the very bottom coil, where a quick glance will not reach.

  2. Check the suspension joints 2.9% of tests

    “ball joint excessively worn”

    With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.

  3. Check the windscreen 2.9% of tests

    “windscreen damaged”

    Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2009 159 through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £46–£124 — and 20% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£46–£124
Cheapest common item: malfunction indicator lamp inoperative or…
£3–£12
Dearest common item: component mounting prescribed areas…
£180–£450
Common items a careful owner can do at home
70%
Repairs that still cost under £30
20%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 2,811 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the 159, side by side

7 model years on record, from 2006 to 2012. Across them the pass rate runs from 67.6% to 74.8% — a spread of 7.2 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2006 67.6% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
  2. 2007 68.9% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
  3. 2008 68.6% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
  4. 2009 70.3%
    rbt (sp) efficiency below…
  5. 2010 70.3% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
  6. 2011 72.1% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
  7. 2012 74.8% coil spring fractured or broken

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2009 Alfa Romeo 159 with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2009 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2009 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2009 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2009 Alfa Romeo 159 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 7,287 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Suspension 1,934 26.20% 20.98% +5.22
Brakes 1,441 19.50% 20.89% −1.39
Tyres 1,221 16.50% 19.76% −3.26
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 766 10.40% 12.21% −1.81
Noise, emissions and leaks 686 9.30% 5.52% +3.78
Body, chassis, structure 534 7.20% 5.57% +1.63
Visibility 258 3.50% 4.97% −1.47
Non-component advisories 175 2.40% 4.18% −1.78
Steering 173 2.30% 2.57% −0.27
Identification of the vehicle 99 1.30% 1.76% −0.46

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 2,811 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements Brakes Major 7.9% £45–110 Brake Discs and Pads Set →
Coil spring fractured or broken Suspension Major 5.5% £25–65 Coil Spring →
Ball joint excessively worn Suspension Major 2.9% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility Minor 2.9% £80–200 Windscreen →
Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension Major 2.7% £180–450 Corrosion Welding Repair →
On or after 01/07/2008 emissions exceed manufacturer's specified limit Noise, emissions and leaks Major 2.6% £60–250 Emissions Repair →
Malfunction indicator lamp inoperative or indicates a malfunction Noise, emissions and leaks Major 2.4% £3–12 Indicator Bulb →
Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 2.2% £5–20 Number Plate Lamp →
Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 2.1% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Major 2.0% £45–95 Tyres →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Advisory 25.9% £45–95
Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks Advisory 14.9% £200–700
Sub-frame corroded and seriously weakened Suspension Advisory 11.2% £180–450
Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes Advisory 11.1% £45–110
Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension Advisory 8.6% £40–150
Brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes Advisory 6.8% £18–45

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
0-30k 6 83.3% 17,408 mi
30-60k 125 75.2% 49,570 mi
60-90k 407 76.7% 78,091 mi
90-120k 899 70.1% 105,793 mi
120k+ 1,372 68.0% 150,712 mi

Source: 2,811 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2009 159 MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2009 Alfa Romeo 159?

70.3% of the 2,811 2009 Alfa Romeo 159 tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 74.0% for cars first used in 2009. First-attempt pass rate: 62.0%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2009 Alfa Romeo 159?

The three most recorded items are rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements (7.86%), coil spring fractured or broken (5.55%), ball joint excessively worn (2.92%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2009 Alfa Romeo 159 MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 83.3% of the time, falling to 68.0% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2009 Alfa Romeo 159 in this dataset had covered 119,199 mi.

Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2009 Alfa Romeo 159?

Diesel: 69.1% pass rate across 2,366 tests. Petrol: 76.2% pass rate across 445 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.

Does the season affect the 2009 Alfa Romeo 159 MOT pass rate?

Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 70.8% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 69.6%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.