Pass rate
77.8%
Around average — 4.9 pts ahead of the 72.9% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 63 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £55–£143
2002 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager MOT pass rate
- 2002
- typical 141,346 mi
Only 63 tests of this exact model and year are in the DVSA data, below the 100 we ask for before a page goes in the index. The figures are still shown, because they are the only ones there are.
Most common fault
Suspension
26.1% of faults · 21.0% nationally
mostly worn arm bushes, split ball-joint boots and broken coil springs.
Which year to buy
- Best 2002 77.8% pass · this year
- Avoid 2003 63.2% pass
Across the 11 years on record, a spread of 14.6 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 74.5%
- Typical mileage
- 141k mi
The 2002 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager MOT pass rate is 77.8% of its MOT tests — 4.9 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. Suspension is the biggest single reason it fails, at 26.1% of what testers record.
Check your postcode
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager does in your corner of the country.
Expert verdict
Lamps & electrics: 1.7× the national share
Lamps & electrics make up 21.1% of everything recorded on the 2002 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager, against 12.2% nationally — 8.9 points above. Suspension is still the single largest share at 26.1%, but at 21.0% nationally that one is ordinary. Walk round the car with the lights on before the test: bulbs, indicators and number-plate lamps are the cheapest failures to prevent and among the most common.
- Beats its own age and mileage. Once you allow for how old and how far these cars have been driven, the expected pass rate is 72.9% and this one manages 77.8% — 4.9 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict.
- When it fails, it costs. Only 34% of this model’s typical repairs come in under £30 in parts — the failures here tend to be the kind that need a garage rather than a bulb.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager? Get an email when these numbers change .
How does the 2002 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 72.9%, so this figure is 4.9 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 74.5%. The median 2002 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager in this dataset had covered 141,346 mi.
63% of the tests on this vehicle ran on Petrol, which passed 82.5% of the time.
The single most recorded failure item is "Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources", noted on 11.11% of tests.
- 63 recorded tests behind this page.
- 77.8% overall pass rate, 74.5% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager, the average is 70.5% — best year 2002 (77.8%), worst 2003 (63.2%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 63
- Typical mileage (median)
- 141,346 mi
- Make and model
- Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager
- Updated
- 2026-11-05
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Number Plate Lamp
Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.
Does mileage affect the Grand Voyager MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 58% so small gaps stay visible.
Fuel type and reliability
Pass rate by fuel type. Petrol is the most common here (63% of tests).
Regional pass rates for the Grand Voyager
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| South East | 33 | 75.8% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2002 Grand Voyager
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2002 Grand Voyager
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the lights 11.1% of tests
“registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
-
Check corrosion 7.9% of tests
“component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength”
Look under the sills, around the jacking points and where the suspension mounts meet the body. Flaking, holed or crumbly metal fails; a brown stain on sound metal does not.
-
Check the battery 6.3% of tests
“battery(ies) insecure”
Check the battery is secure and its terminals are clean and tight — a loose battery is a fail on its own, and a weak one shows up as slow cranking on a cold morning.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2002 Grand Voyager through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £55–£143 — and 34% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £55–£143
- Cheapest common item: anti-lock braking system warning lamp…
- £3–£15
- Dearest common item: component mounting prescribed areas…
- £180–£450
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 50%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 34%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 63 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the Grand Voyager, side by side
11 model years on record, from 2002 to 2012. Across them the pass rate runs from 63.2% to 77.8% — a spread of 14.6 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2002 77.8%registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2003 63.2% component mounting prescribed…
- 2004 65.4% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
- 2005 68.9% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2006 71.6% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2007 68.9% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2008 70.3% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2009 71.2% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2010 72.4% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2011 75.3% windscreen damaged but not…
- 2012 74.8% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2002 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2002 cars with a similar record
- Land Rover Range Rover 77.4%
- BMW 3 Series 77.2%
- BMW 530 77.2%
- Lexus IS200 77.2%
- MG Tf 77.1%
- Mercedes-Benz Clk 77.1%
Closest pass rates among 2002 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2002 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 159 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 42 | 26.10% | 20.98% | +5.12 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 34 | 21.10% | 12.21% | +8.89 |
| Brakes | 31 | 19.30% | 20.89% | −1.59 |
| Tyres | 15 | 9.30% | 19.76% | −10.46 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 13 | 8.10% | 5.52% | +2.58 |
| Non-component advisories | 9 | 5.60% | 4.18% | +1.42 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 6 | 3.70% | 5.57% | −1.87 |
| Visibility | 4 | 2.50% | 4.97% | −2.47 |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 3 | 1.90% | 0.82% | +1.08 |
| Steering | 2 | 1.20% | 2.57% | −1.37 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 11.1% | £5–20 |
| Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension | Major | 7.9% | £180–450 |
| Battery(ies) insecure but not likely to fall from carrier Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 6.3% | £60–140 |
| Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements Brakes | Major | 6.3% | £45–110 |
| Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure | Minor | 4.8% | £80–250 |
| Parking brake performance inoperative on one side Brakes | Major | 4.8% | £60–150 |
| Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 4.8% | £5–25 |
| Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault Brakes | Major | 3.2% | £3–15 |
| Headlamp aim too high Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Rectified | 3.2% | £30–80 |
| Headlamp aim too low Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Rectified | 3.2% | £30–80 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks | Advisory | 14.3% | £200–700 |
| Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres | Advisory | 12.7% | £45–95 |
| Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension | Advisory | 11.1% | £180–450 |
| Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres | Advisory | 7.9% | £45–95 |
| Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | Advisory | 7.9% | £40–150 |
| Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak Suspension | Advisory | 7.9% | £30–75 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30k | 3 | 66.7% | 27,780 mi |
| 60-90k | 4 | 100.0% | 76,159 mi |
| 90-120k | 12 | 100.0% | 106,364 mi |
| 120k+ | 44 | 70.5% | 160,282 mi |
Source: 63 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2002 Grand Voyager MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2002 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager?
77.8% of the 63 2002 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.9% for cars first used in 2002. First-attempt pass rate: 74.5%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2002 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager?
The three most recorded items are registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (11.11%), component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength (7.94%), battery(ies) insecure but not likely to fall from carrier (6.35%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2002 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 66.7% of the time, falling to 70.5% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2002 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager in this dataset had covered 141,346 mi.
Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2002 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager?
Petrol: 82.5% pass rate across 40 tests. Diesel: 69.6% pass rate across 23 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.