Pass rate
75.3%
Around average — 0.6 pts behind the 75.9% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 308 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £31–£81
2011 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager MOT pass rate
- 2011
- typical 101,220 mi
Most common fault
Brakes
29.7% of faults · 20.9% nationally
mostly worn pads and discs, corroded pipes and a handbrake that will not hold.
Part only £25–£40 for Brake pads under 1.5 mm. What fitting it takes →
Which year to buy
- Best 2002 77.8% pass
- Avoid 2003 63.2% pass
Across the 11 years on record, a spread of 14.6 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 69.1%
- Typical mileage
- 101k mi
The 2011 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager MOT pass rate is 75.3% of its MOT tests — about what its age and mileage predict. Brakes is the biggest single reason it fails, at 29.7% of what testers record.
Check your postcode
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager does in your corner of the country.
Expert verdict
Brakes: 1.4× the national share
Brakes make up 29.7% of everything recorded on the 2011 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager, against 20.9% nationally — 8.8 points above. Have the discs and pads measured rather than glanced at, and ask whether the handbrake holds on a slope.
- Based on a small sample. 308 tests back this page. That is enough to publish and to index, not enough to treat the decimal places as precise — read the pattern, not the second digit.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager? Get an email when these numbers change .
How does the 2011 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 75.9%, so this figure is 0.6 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 69.1%. The median 2011 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager in this dataset had covered 101,220 mi.
Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 75.1% of the time, April–September 75.6%.
The single most recorded failure item is "Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view", noted on 6.49% of tests.
- 308 recorded tests behind this page.
- 75.3% overall pass rate, 69.1% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager, the average is 70.5% — best year 2002 (77.8%), worst 2003 (63.2%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 308
- Typical mileage (median)
- 101,220 mi
- Make and model
- Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager
- Updated
- 2026-11-05
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Windscreen
Typically a garage job — get quotes before committing.
Does mileage affect the Grand Voyager MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 62% so small gaps stay visible.
Regional pass rates for the Grand Voyager
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| South East | 80 | 75.0% |
| North West | 42 | 73.8% |
| East of England | 40 | 72.5% |
| South West | 39 | 76.9% |
| West Midlands | 32 | 81.3% |
| Yorkshire | 27 | 77.8% |
| East Midlands | 20 | 85.0% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2011 Grand Voyager
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2011 Grand Voyager
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the windscreen 6.5% of tests
“windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
-
Check the lights 5.8% of tests
“malfunction indicator lamp inoperative or indicates a malfunction”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
-
Check the wipers and washers 3.3% of tests
“wipers blade defective”
Run the wipers with the screen wet: they should clear it in one sweep without smearing or juddering. Top the washer bottle up and check both jets hit the screen.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2011 Grand Voyager through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £31–£81 — and 42% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £31–£81
- Cheapest common item: malfunction indicator lamp inoperative or…
- £3–£12
- Dearest common item: windscreen damaged
- £80–£200
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 80%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 42%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 308 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the Grand Voyager, side by side
11 model years on record, from 2002 to 2012. Across them the pass rate runs from 63.2% to 77.8% — a spread of 14.6 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2002 77.8% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2003 63.2% component mounting prescribed…
- 2004 65.4% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
- 2005 68.9% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2006 71.6% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2007 68.9% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2008 70.3% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2009 71.2% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2010 72.4% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2011 75.3%windscreen damaged but not…
- 2012 74.8% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2011 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2011 cars with a similar record
- Ford Focus 75.2%
- Kia Sedona 75.2%
- Fiat Qubo 75.2%
- Ford S-Max 75.4%
- London Taxis Int TX4 75.4%
- Nissan Note 75.1%
Closest pass rates among 2011 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2011 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 666 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brakes | 200 | 29.70% | 20.89% | +8.81 |
| Suspension | 125 | 18.50% | 20.98% | −2.48 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 89 | 13.20% | 12.21% | +0.99 |
| Tyres | 85 | 12.60% | 19.76% | −7.16 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 50 | 7.40% | 5.52% | +1.88 |
| Visibility | 45 | 6.70% | 4.97% | +1.73 |
| Non-component advisories | 42 | 6.20% | 4.18% | +2.02 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 12 | 1.80% | 5.57% | −3.77 |
| Steering | 11 | 1.60% | 2.57% | −0.97 |
| Identification of the vehicle | 7 | 1.00% | 1.76% | −0.76 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility | Minor | 6.5% | £80–200 |
| Malfunction indicator lamp inoperative or indicates a malfunction Noise, emissions and leaks | Major | 5.8% | £3–12 |
| Parking brake performance inoperative on one side Brakes | Major | 4.5% | £60–150 |
| Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 4.2% | £5–25 |
| Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements Brakes | Major | 4.2% | £45–110 |
| Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 4.2% | £5–20 |
| Wipers blade defective Visibility | Minor | 3.3% | £8–22 |
| Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension | Minor | 2.9% | £18–45 |
| Brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes | Major | 2.9% | £18–45 |
| Rbt (sp) efficiency less than 50% of the required value Brakes | Major | 2.9% | £45–110 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres | Advisory | 17.5% | £45–95 |
| Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes | Advisory | 12.7% | £45–110 |
| Brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes | Advisory | 11.4% | £18–45 |
| Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | Advisory | 11.4% | £40–150 |
| Non-component advisories Passenger seat(s) missing at time of test Non-component advisories | Advisory | 7.1% | £20–80 |
| Brake discs significantly and obviously worn Brakes | Advisory | 5.8% | £45–110 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30k | 6 | 83.3% | 26,836 mi |
| 30-60k | 20 | 70.0% | 46,755 mi |
| 60-90k | 90 | 73.3% | 77,175 mi |
| 90-120k | 98 | 75.5% | 104,830 mi |
| 120k+ | 94 | 77.7% | 150,231 mi |
Source: 308 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2011 Grand Voyager MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2011 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager?
75.3% of the 308 2011 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 75.9% for cars first used in 2011. First-attempt pass rate: 69.1%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2011 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager?
The three most recorded items are windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (6.49%), malfunction indicator lamp inoperative or indicates a malfunction (5.84%), parking brake performance inoperative on one side (4.55%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2011 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 83.3% of the time, falling to 77.7% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2011 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager in this dataset had covered 101,220 mi.
Does the season affect the 2011 Chrysler Jeep Grand Voyager MOT pass rate?
Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 75.1% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 75.6%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.