2000 Daihatsu Cuore MOT pass rate

Pass rate

66.2%

Below average — 7.6 pts behind the 73.8% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 136 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £67–£192

Which year to buy

  • Best 2002 76.4% pass
  • Avoid 2001 66.0% pass

Across the 3 years on record, a spread of 10.4 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
54.9%
Typical mileage
51k mi

The 2000 Daihatsu Cuore MOT pass rate is 66.2% of its MOT tests — 7.6 points behind what its age and mileage predict. Suspension is the biggest single reason it fails, at 27.8% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2000 Daihatsu Cuore on the real record

66.2% of 2000 Daihatsu Cuore MOTs passed — 136 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Check your postcode

MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Daihatsu Cuore does in your corner of the country.

How one model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Expert verdict

Body & chassis: 3.6× the national share

Body & chassis accounts for 19.8% of everything recorded on the 2000 Daihatsu Cuore, against 5.6% nationally — 14.2 points above. Suspension is still the single largest share at 27.8%, but at 21.0% nationally that one is ordinary. Look underneath for corrosion near the jacking points and suspension mounts; surface rust is normal, flaking metal is not.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Daihatsu Cuore? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2000 Daihatsu Cuore compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 73.8%, so this figure is 7.6 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 54.9%. The median 2000 Daihatsu Cuore in this dataset had covered 51,363 mi.

Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 65.1% of the time, April–September 67.1%.

The single most recorded failure item is "Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated", noted on 22.79% of tests.

  • 136 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 66.2% overall pass rate, 54.9% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Daihatsu Cuore, the average is 69.5% — best year 2002 (76.4%), worst 2001 (66.0%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
136
Typical mileage (median)
51,363 mi
Make and model
Daihatsu Cuore
Updated
2026-11-05

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Ball Joint

Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.

Does mileage affect the Cuore MOT pass rate?

0-30k 77.8%
30-60k 68.8%
60-90k 58.1%
90-120k 66.7%
120k+ 100.0%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 50% so small gaps stay visible.

Regional pass rates for the Cuore

Region Tests Pass rate
South East 50 64.0%
South West 28 60.7%
West Midlands 21 57.1%

Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.

What fails a 2000 Cuore

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Suspension 27.8%
+6.8 pts vs national national 21.0% Price suspension parts
Body & chassis 19.8%
+14.2 pts vs national national 5.6% Find body panels
Brakes 13.9%
−7.0 pts vs national national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Lamps & electrics 8.9%
−3.3 pts vs national national 12.2% Order bulbs & wipers
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Tyres 8.0%
  • Emissions & leaks 6.4%
  • Identification 3.9%
  • Advisories 3.6%
  • Visibility 3.2%
  • Seat belts 3.0%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2000 Daihatsu Cuore tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2000 Cuore

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check the suspension joints 22.8% of tests

    “ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”

    With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.

  2. Check corrosion 14.0% of tests

    “component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength”

    Look under the sills, around the jacking points and where the suspension mounts meet the body. Flaking, holed or crumbly metal fails; a brown stain on sound metal does not.

  3. Check the exhaust and emissions 5.9% of tests

    “exhaust system has a major leak of exhaust gases”

    Listen for a blow at idle and have someone rev it gently. Then look at the tailpipe smoke: blue is oil, white when warm is coolant, black is over-fuelling. Any of those and the emissions test is the least of it.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2000 Cuore through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £67–£192 — and 5% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£67–£192
Cheapest common item: wipers does not clear the windscreen…
£8–£22
Dearest common item: component mounting prescribed areas…
£180–£450
Common items a careful owner can do at home
30%
Repairs that still cost under £30
5%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 136 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the Cuore, side by side

3 model years on record, from 2000 to 2002. Across them the pass rate runs from 66.0% to 76.4% — a spread of 10.4 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2000 66.2%
    ball joint dust cover severely…
  2. 2001 66.0% ball joint dust cover severely…
  3. 2002 76.4% component mounting prescribed…

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2000 Daihatsu Cuore with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2000 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2000 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2000 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2000 Daihatsu Cuore 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 432 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Suspension 122 27.80% 20.98% +6.82
Body, chassis, structure 87 19.80% 5.57% +14.23
Brakes 61 13.90% 20.89% −6.99
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 39 8.90% 12.21% −3.31
Tyres 35 8.00% 19.76% −11.76
Noise, emissions and leaks 28 6.40% 5.52% +0.88
Identification of the vehicle 17 3.90% 1.76% +2.14
Non-component advisories 16 3.60% 4.18% −0.58
Visibility 14 3.20% 4.97% −1.77
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 13 3.00% 0.82% +2.18

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 136 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension Minor 22.8% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure Minor 15.4% £80–250 Body Panel Repair →
Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension Major 14.0% £180–450 Corrosion Welding Repair →
Joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body, chassis, structure Major 11.8% £80–250 Body Panel Repair →
Service brake imbalance across an axle Brakes Major 8.1% £45–110 Brake Discs and Pads Set →
Exhaust system has a major leak of exhaust gases Body, chassis, structure Major 5.9% £45–120 Exhaust →
Wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility Major 5.2% £8–22 Wiper Blade →
Prescribed areas prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems Major 4.4% £40–120 Seat Belt →
Catalyst emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits Noise, emissions and leaks Major 3.7% £60–250 Emissions Repair →
Catalyst emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle exceeds manufacturer's specified limits Noise, emissions and leaks Major 3.7% £60–250 Emissions Repair →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension Advisory 18.4% £180–450
Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes Advisory 16.2% £80–180
Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres Advisory 12.5% £45–95
Registration plates inscription illegible Identification of the vehicle Advisory 12.5% £20–80
Exhaust system has a major leak of exhaust gases Body, chassis, structure Advisory 10.3% £45–120
Non-component advisories Fuel Pipe/s corroded Non-component advisories Advisory 8.8% £180–450

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
0-30k 9 77.8% 19,876 mi
30-60k 80 68.8% 45,177 mi
60-90k 43 58.1% 69,883 mi
90-120k 3 66.7% 93,098 mi
120k+ 1 100.0% 130,072 mi

Source: 136 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2000 Cuore MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2000 Daihatsu Cuore?

66.2% of the 136 2000 Daihatsu Cuore tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 73.8% for cars first used in 2000. First-attempt pass rate: 54.9%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2000 Daihatsu Cuore?

The three most recorded items are ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (22.79%), joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (15.44%), component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength (13.97%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2000 Daihatsu Cuore MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 77.8% of the time, falling to 100.0% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2000 Daihatsu Cuore in this dataset had covered 51,363 mi.

Does the season affect the 2000 Daihatsu Cuore MOT pass rate?

Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 65.1% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 67.1%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.