Pass rate
71.3%
Below average — 1.1 pts behind the 72.4% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 595 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £35–£91
2005 MG Zt-T MOT pass rate
- 2005
- 2 trims combined
- typical 123,060 mi
Most common fault
Suspension
28.3% of faults · 21.0% nationally
mostly worn arm bushes, split ball-joint boots and broken coil springs.
Which year to buy
- Best 2006 76.0% pass
- Avoid 2003 70.2% pass
Across the 6 years on record, a spread of 5.8 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 63.8%
- Typical mileage
- 123k mi
The 2005 MG Zt-T MOT pass rate is 71.3% of its MOT tests — 1.1 points behind what its age and mileage predict. Suspension is the biggest single reason it fails, at 28.3% of what testers record.
Check your postcode
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how MG Zt-T does in your corner of the country.
Expert verdict
Suspension: 1.3× the national share
Suspension accounts for 28.3% of everything recorded on the 2005 MG Zt-T, against 21.0% nationally — 7.3 points above. Ask for the front and rear suspension to be checked on a ramp before you buy — worn bushes and broken springs are cheap to look at and expensive to discover at test time.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a MG Zt-T? Get an email when these numbers change .
Every MG Zt-T first registered in 2005 is combined here — 2 trim and body variants in total — so the sample is as large as the DVSA data allows.
How does the 2005 MG Zt-T compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 72.4%, so this figure is 1.1 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 63.8%. The median 2005 MG Zt-T in this dataset had covered 123,060 mi.
The most common fuel recorded here is Diesel — 65% of tests, with a 69.8% pass rate. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 71.1% of the time, April–September 71.5%.
The single most recorded failure item is "Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements", noted on 5.21% of tests.
- 595 recorded tests behind this page.
- 71.3% overall pass rate, 63.8% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the MG Zt-T, the average is 72.6% — best year 2006 (76.0%), worst 2003 (70.2%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 595
- Typical mileage (median)
- 123,060 mi
- Make and model
- MG Zt-T
- Updated
- 2026-11-05
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Brake Discs and Pads Set
Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.
Does mileage affect the Zt-T MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 60% so small gaps stay visible.
Fuel type and reliability
Pass rate by fuel type. Diesel is the most common here (65% of tests).
Regional pass rates for the Zt-T
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| South East | 123 | 69.1% |
| South West | 103 | 68.0% |
| West Midlands | 70 | 77.1% |
| East Midlands | 61 | 68.9% |
| Yorkshire | 50 | 62.0% |
| North West | 46 | 80.4% |
| East of England | 44 | 75.0% |
| Scotland | 43 | 72.1% |
| Wales | 21 | 71.4% |
| North East | 19 | 84.2% |
| London | 15 | 66.7% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2005 Zt-T
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2005 Zt-T
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the lights 4.9% of tests
“registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
-
Check the windscreen 3.7% of tests
“windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
-
Check the suspension joints 3.4% of tests
“ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”
With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2005 Zt-T through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £35–£91 — and 36% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £35–£91
- Cheapest common item: srs malfunction indicator lamp warning lamp…
- £3–£12
- Dearest common item: component mounting prescribed areas…
- £180–£450
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 70%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 36%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 595 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the Zt-T, side by side
6 model years on record, from 2001 to 2006. Across them the pass rate runs from 70.2% to 76.0% — a spread of 5.8 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2001 70.4% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2002 74.9% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
- 2003 70.2% windscreen damaged but not…
- 2004 74.1% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
- 2005 71.3%rbt (sp) efficiency below…
- 2006 76.0% headlamp lens slightly defective
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2005 MG Zt-T with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2005 cars with a similar record
- Suzuki Ignis 71.3%
- Volvo XC90 71.2%
- Nissan Pathfinder 71.2%
- Mitsubishi Colt 71.4%
- Toyota Hilux 71.4%
- Citroen C4 71.4%
Closest pass rates among 2005 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2005 MG Zt-T 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 1,700 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 494 | 28.30% | 20.98% | +7.32 |
| Brakes | 383 | 21.90% | 20.89% | +1.01 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 243 | 13.90% | 12.21% | +1.69 |
| Tyres | 206 | 11.80% | 19.76% | −7.96 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 92 | 5.30% | 5.57% | −0.27 |
| Steering | 79 | 4.50% | 2.57% | +1.93 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 65 | 3.70% | 5.52% | −1.82 |
| Visibility | 53 | 3.00% | 4.97% | −1.97 |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 46 | 2.60% | 0.82% | +1.78 |
| Non-component advisories | 39 | 2.20% | 4.18% | −1.98 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements Brakes | Major | 5.2% | £45–110 |
| Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 4.9% | £5–20 |
| Srs malfunction indicator lamp warning lamp indicates a fault Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Major | 4.5% | £3–12 |
| Headlamp lens slightly defective Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 3.7% | £5–25 |
| Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility | Minor | 3.7% | £80–200 |
| Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension | Minor | 3.4% | £18–45 |
| Ball joint excessively worn Suspension | Major | 3.4% | £18–45 |
| Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension | Major | 2.5% | £180–450 |
| Linkage ball joint dust cover ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension | Minor | 2.5% | £18–45 |
| Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 2.2% | £30–80 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres | Advisory | 20.3% | £45–95 |
| Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes | Advisory | 16.5% | £80–180 |
| Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes | Advisory | 15.3% | £45–110 |
| Suspension arm corroded and seriously weakened Suspension | Advisory | 9.4% | £35–85 |
| Sub-frame corroded and seriously weakened Suspension | Advisory | 9.1% | £180–450 |
| Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension | Advisory | 8.7% | £180–450 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30k | 9 | 100.0% | 24,136 mi |
| 30-60k | 31 | 74.2% | 42,075 mi |
| 60-90k | 100 | 74.0% | 78,129 mi |
| 90-120k | 148 | 73.0% | 104,473 mi |
| 120k+ | 307 | 68.4% | 156,224 mi |
Source: 595 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2005 Zt-T MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2005 MG Zt-T?
71.3% of the 595 2005 MG Zt-T tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.4% for cars first used in 2005. First-attempt pass rate: 63.8%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2005 MG Zt-T?
The three most recorded items are rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements (5.21%), registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.87%), srs malfunction indicator lamp warning lamp indicates a fault (4.54%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2005 MG Zt-T MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 100.0% of the time, falling to 68.4% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2005 MG Zt-T in this dataset had covered 123,060 mi.
Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2005 MG Zt-T?
Diesel: 69.8% pass rate across 384 tests. Petrol: 73.9% pass rate across 211 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.
Does the season affect the 2005 MG Zt-T MOT pass rate?
Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 71.1% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 71.5%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.