2003 Mitsubishi Carisma MOT pass rate

Pass rate

67.6%

Below average — 5.0 pts behind the 72.6% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 1,118 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £45–£128

Which year to buy

  • Best 2000 73.9% pass
  • Avoid 2003 67.6% pass · this year

Across the 5 years on record, a spread of 6.3 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
56.8%
Typical mileage
102k mi

The 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma MOT pass rate is 67.6% of its MOT tests — 5.0 points behind what its age and mileage predict. Brakes is the biggest single reason it fails, at 24.3% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma on the real record

67.6% of 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma MOTs passed — 1,118 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Check your postcode

MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Mitsubishi Carisma does in your corner of the country.

How one model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Expert verdict

Fewer problems with tyres

Tyres are 10.1% of this car’s recorded faults, against 19.8% nationally — the mirror image of the usual story on a car of this age.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Mitsubishi Carisma? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 72.6%, so this figure is 5.0 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 56.8%. The median 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma in this dataset had covered 102,115 mi.

The most common fuel recorded here is Diesel — 51% of tests, with a 66.1% pass rate. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 67.8% of the time, April–September 67.4%.

The single most recorded failure item is "Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated", noted on 9.21% of tests.

  • 1,118 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 67.6% overall pass rate, 56.8% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Mitsubishi Carisma, the average is 68.7% — best year 2000 (73.9%), worst 2003 (67.6%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
1,118
Typical mileage (median)
102,115 mi
Make and model
Mitsubishi Carisma
Updated
2026-11-05

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Ball Joint

Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.

Does mileage affect the Carisma MOT pass rate?

0-30k 90.9%
30-60k 80.0%
60-90k 69.1%
90-120k 64.1%
120k+ 64.8%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 56% so small gaps stay visible.

Fuel type and reliability

Diesel 66.1%
Petrol 69.2%

Pass rate by fuel type. Diesel is the most common here (51% of tests).

Regional pass rates for the Carisma

Region Tests Pass rate
South East 238 70.2%
South West 201 63.2%
North West 131 68.7%
East of England 115 68.7%
West Midlands 113 71.7%
Yorkshire 96 61.5%
East Midlands 88 73.9%
Wales 57 57.9%
North East 27 66.7%
Scotland 26 65.4%
London 26 76.9%

Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.

What fails a 2003 Carisma

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Brakes 24.3%
+3.4 pts vs national national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Suspension 22.2%
+1.2 pts vs national national 21.0% Price suspension parts
Lamps & electrics 13.0%
+0.8 pts vs national national 12.2% Order bulbs & wipers
Tyres 10.1%
−9.7 pts vs national national 19.8% Compare tyre prices
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Emissions & leaks 8.1%
  • Body & chassis 7.4%
  • Steering 4.7%
  • Visibility 4.4%
  • Identification 3.0%
  • Advisories 1.7%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2003 Carisma

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check the suspension joints 9.2% of tests

    “ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”

    With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.

  2. Check the lights 9.0% of tests

    “headlamp lens slightly defective”

    Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.

  3. Check the windscreen 6.8% of tests

    “windscreen damaged”

    Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2003 Carisma through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £45–£128 — and 15% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£45–£128
Cheapest common item: headlamp lens slightly defective
£5–£25
Dearest common item: joints constant velocity boot severely…
£80–£250
Common items a careful owner can do at home
50%
Repairs that still cost under £30
15%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 1,118 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the Carisma, side by side

5 model years on record, from 2000 to 2004. Across them the pass rate runs from 67.6% to 73.9% — a spread of 6.3 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2000 73.9% headlamp lens slightly defective
  2. 2001 68.8% ball joint dust cover severely…
  3. 2002 69.6% ball joint dust cover severely…
  4. 2003 67.6%
    ball joint dust cover severely…
  5. 2004 68.9% ball joint dust cover severely…

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2003 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2003 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2003 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 4,396 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Brakes 1,080 24.30% 20.89% +3.41
Suspension 985 22.20% 20.98% +1.22
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 578 13.00% 12.21% +0.79
Tyres 450 10.10% 19.76% −9.66
Noise, emissions and leaks 360 8.10% 5.52% +2.58
Body, chassis, structure 329 7.40% 5.57% +1.83
Steering 211 4.70% 2.57% +2.13
Visibility 194 4.40% 4.97% −0.57
Identification of the vehicle 133 3.00% 1.76% +1.24
Non-component advisories 76 1.70% 4.18% −2.48

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 1,118 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension Minor 9.2% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Headlamp lens slightly defective Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 9.0% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure Minor 9.0% £80–250 Body Panel Repair →
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility Minor 6.8% £80–200 Windscreen →
Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements Brakes Major 5.0% £45–110 Brake Discs and Pads Set →
Linkage pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension Major 4.6% £40–150 Suspension Component →
Joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body, chassis, structure Major 4.5% £80–250 Body Panel Repair →
Ball joint excessively worn Suspension Major 4.4% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes Major 4.1% £80–180 Brake Pipe →
Track rod end ball joint dust cover damaged or deteriorated, but preventing the ingress of dirt Steering Minor 3.9% £18–45 Ball Joint →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks Advisory 25.9% £200–700
Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes Advisory 24.1% £80–180
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Advisory 19.7% £45–95
Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes Advisory 18.0% £45–110
Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres Advisory 14.2% £45–95
Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension Advisory 12.8% £40–150

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
0-30k 11 90.9% 24,593 mi
30-60k 125 80.0% 46,768 mi
60-90k 285 69.1% 76,295 mi
90-120k 304 64.1% 104,555 mi
120k+ 392 64.8% 155,019 mi

Source: 1,118 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2003 Carisma MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma?

67.6% of the 1,118 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.6% for cars first used in 2003. First-attempt pass rate: 56.8%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma?

The three most recorded items are ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (9.21%), headlamp lens slightly defective (9.03%), joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (9.03%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 90.9% of the time, falling to 64.8% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma in this dataset had covered 102,115 mi.

Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma?

Diesel: 66.1% pass rate across 566 tests. Petrol: 69.2% pass rate across 552 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.

Does the season affect the 2003 Mitsubishi Carisma MOT pass rate?

Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 67.8% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 67.4%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.