MOT PASS RATES

The Jaguar F-Pace 2017 by postcode

93.9% in BB vs 81.2% in EX — a 12.6-point gap for the same model and year

Postcode spread

Where the same car, same year, passes — and where it does not.

Jaguar F-Pace 2017 MOT pass rate by postcode area

The Jaguar F-Pace 2017 MOT pass rate by postcode area runs from 93.9% in BB down to 81.2% in EX — 12.6 points apart for the same model, the same model year and the same test. Below are all 92 postcode areas that tested enough of them to publish.

Best area BB · 93.9% 294 tests
Worst area EX · 81.2% 400 tests
National rate 88.8% all years of this model

What a 12.6-point gap means

Pinned to one model year, this is not a table of old cars: every 2017 Jaguar F-Pace in the data is the same age. Over five annual MOTs the gap between the best and worst area is 0.6 extra failures — about £19–£45 in parts at this model's typical failure cost .

133 of 170 models by how far apart their best and worst postcode area are. Wider: BMW 320 (12.6). Narrower: Hyundai Tucson (12.5).

Rates are for the 2017 model year only, in areas with at least 200 tests of it. Mileage, trim and use are pooled — a city van and a motorway van are one line here. Method. Compare it with the model's full history or this exact year.

Every postcode area, worst first

Area Pass rate vs national Tests
EX 81.2% -7.6 400
BS 81.6% -7.2 565
CA 81.9% -6.9 271
PL 82.1% -6.7 301
PA 82.2% -6.6 202
AB 82.8% -6.0 424
BN 83.4% -5.4 410
YO 83.6% -5.2 489
CH 83.8% -5.0 474
HP 84.1% -4.7 472
LN 84.1% -4.7 321
BR 84.2% -4.6 202
BA 84.7% -4.1 216
WN 85.1% -3.7 276
SO 85.4% -3.4 425
HU 85.4% -3.4 371
ST 85.5% -3.3 413
CF 85.5% -3.3 497
WD 85.7% -3.1 230
CB 85.7% -3.1 266
PR 85.8% -3.0 451
BH 85.9% -2.9 403
PO 86.0% -2.8 472
SN 86.4% -2.4 403
GL 86.4% -2.4 346
NN 86.6% -2.2 589
EH 86.6% -2.2 374
AL 86.6% -2.2 247
WA 86.8% -2.0 501
SA 86.9% -1.9 327
RG 86.9% -1.9 884
DL 87.1% -1.7 210
G 87.1% -1.7 607
SW 87.2% -1.6 218
LS 87.2% -1.6 531
BL 87.2% -1.6 321
KT 87.3% -1.5 456
SG 87.4% -1.4 261
TN 87.4% -1.4 681
NR 87.5% -1.3 552
HA 87.6% -1.2 290
M 87.6% -1.2 533
CM 87.7% -1.1 722
RH 87.7% -1.1 495
KA 87.9% -0.9 214
OX 87.9% -0.9 453
CT 87.9% -0.9 314
ML 88.0% -0.8 208
NP 88.0% -0.8 283
NG 88.1% -0.7 805
WF 88.2% -0.6 414
ME 88.2% -0.6 516
B 88.2% -0.6 1,111
TA 88.3% -0.5 205
CV 88.4% -0.4 662
GU 88.4% -0.4 585
DN 88.4% -0.4 569
SK 88.5% -0.3 451
PE 88.5% -0.3 852
BD 88.8% 0.0 276
LL 88.8% 0.0 223
CO 88.9% +0.1 288
LE 89.0% +0.2 648
CW 89.1% +0.3 358
SL 89.1% +0.3 386
NE 89.4% +0.6 583
IP 89.4% +0.6 436
OL 89.5% +0.7 286
L 89.5% +0.7 458
MK 89.7% +0.9 456
UB 89.8% +1.0 305
WV 89.9% +1.1 298
TW 90.1% +1.3 355
DA 90.2% +1.4 468
DE 90.3% +1.5 720
WS 90.4% +1.6 323
W 90.5% +1.7 232
N 90.7% +1.9 258
S 90.8% +2.0 939
SS 91.0% +2.2 411
NW 91.0% +2.2 234
CR 91.1% +2.3 384
EN 91.1% +2.3 305
SY 91.3% +2.5 300
RM 91.6% +2.8 310
TS 91.6% +2.8 466
E 91.8% +3.0 207
TF 91.9% +3.1 210
WR 92.1% +3.3 278
SE 92.4% +3.6 304
LU 92.9% +4.1 266
BB 93.9% +5.1 294

“vs national” is against this model's own rate across all years (88.8%), not against the national rate for all cars — a number that would flatter a new model and punish an old one.

What this cannot tell you

For context, this model's best area runs 5 points above its own all-years national rate.

The full table EX area page All Jaguar F-Pace years