MOT PASS RATES

The Mazda Cx-5 2018 by postcode

96.8% in TW vs 82.7% in WS — a 14.1-point gap for the same model and year

Postcode spread

Where the same car, same year, passes — and where it does not.

Mazda Cx-5 2018 MOT pass rate by postcode area

The Mazda Cx-5 2018 MOT pass rate by postcode area runs from 96.8% in TW down to 82.7% in WS — 14.1 points apart for the same model, the same model year and the same test. Below are all 78 postcode areas that tested enough of them to publish.

Best area TW · 96.8% 278 tests
Worst area WS · 82.7% 202 tests
National rate 86.3% all years of this model

What a 14.1-point gap means

Pinned to one model year, this is not a table of old cars: every 2018 Mazda Cx-5 in the data is the same age. Over five annual MOTs the gap between the best and worst area is 0.7 extra failures — about £20–£49 in parts at this model's typical failure cost .

123 of 170 models by how far apart their best and worst postcode area are. Wider: Kia Niro (14.1). Narrower: Honda Hr-V (13.7).

Rates are for the 2018 model year only, in areas with at least 200 tests of it. Mileage, trim and use are pooled — a city van and a motorway van are one line here. Method. Compare it with the model's full history or this exact year.

Every postcode area, worst first

Area Pass rate vs national Tests
WS 82.7% -3.6 202
PH 82.9% -3.4 246
DD 83.2% -3.1 214
AB 83.5% -2.8 358
BA 84.3% -2.0 293
DL 84.9% -1.4 225
KY 85.1% -1.2 296
BN 86.3% 0.0 285
LE 86.5% +0.2 513
PA 86.6% +0.3 232
EH 86.7% +0.4 667
NN 86.9% +0.6 567
G 87.0% +0.7 670
NG 87.2% +0.9 632
LS 87.3% +1.0 324
PL 87.4% +1.1 246
GL 87.4% +1.1 397
YO 87.7% +1.4 357
WF 87.8% +1.5 238
WR 87.9% +1.6 223
MK 87.9% +1.6 397
M 88.1% +1.8 320
SO 88.1% +1.8 489
TS 88.2% +1.9 254
GU 88.3% +2.0 454
CO 88.5% +2.2 226
HP 88.5% +2.2 340
RG 88.6% +2.3 630
SN 88.6% +2.3 324
BH 88.7% +2.4 470
BS 88.8% +2.5 623
KA 88.8% +2.5 242
L 89.0% +2.7 255
BL 89.0% +2.7 255
NP 89.3% +3.0 252
ML 89.4% +3.1 245
OL 89.5% +3.2 237
WA 89.5% +3.2 287
DN 89.6% +3.3 538
RM 89.6% +3.3 212
FK 89.6% +3.3 367
LL 89.7% +3.4 253
CF 89.9% +3.6 396
ST 89.9% +3.6 347
DE 90.0% +3.7 370
EX 90.0% +3.7 260
TA 90.0% +3.7 250
NR 90.1% +3.8 416
B 90.2% +3.9 782
SG 90.2% +3.9 439
DA 90.2% +3.9 297
PE 90.7% +4.4 665
PO 90.8% +4.5 556
OX 91.1% +4.8 449
SK 91.2% +4.9 521
IP 91.2% +4.9 444
LN 91.3% +5.0 229
KT 91.4% +5.1 420
CW 91.4% +5.1 339
WD 91.5% +5.2 319
NE 91.6% +5.3 580
TN 91.7% +5.4 363
CV 91.9% +5.6 505
RH 91.9% +5.6 322
PR 92.0% +5.7 351
BR 92.2% +5.9 257
ME 92.4% +6.1 327
S 92.6% +6.3 552
IG 92.6% +6.3 231
CH 92.7% +6.4 491
SY 93.1% +6.8 231
SA 93.1% +6.8 318
CR 93.6% +7.3 299
CM 93.7% +7.4 271
CB 93.9% +7.6 231
WV 94.1% +7.8 219
BB 95.5% +9.2 221
TW 96.8% +10.5 278

“vs national” is against this model's own rate across all years (86.3%), not against the national rate for all cars — a number that would flatter a new model and punish an old one.

What this cannot tell you

For context, this model's best area runs 11 points above its own all-years national rate.

The full table WS area page All Mazda Cx-5 years