Skoda Citigo 2014 MOT pass rate by postcode area
The Skoda Citigo 2014 MOT pass rate by postcode area runs from 89.5% in CH down to 73.7% in AB — 15.8 points apart for the same model, the same model year and the same test. Below are all 63 postcode areas that tested enough of them to publish.
What a 15.8-point gap means
Pinned to one model year, this is not a table of old cars: every 2014 Skoda Citigo in the data is the same age. Over five annual MOTs the gap between the best and worst area is 0.8 extra failures — about £32–£94 in parts at this model's typical failure cost .
101 of 170 models by how far apart their best and worst postcode area are. Wider: Renault Kadjar (15.9). Narrower: Nissan Qashqai (15.6).
Rates are for the 2014 model year only, in areas with at least 200 tests of it. Mileage, trim and use are pooled — a city van and a motorway van are one line here. Method. Compare it with the model's full history or this exact year.
Every postcode area, worst first
| Area | Pass rate | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| AB | 73.7% | 209 |
| G | 76.4% | 348 |
| DL | 77.8% | 212 |
| EH | 79.1% | 537 |
| LN | 79.5% | 210 |
| KY | 79.6% | 211 |
| LS | 80.0% | 570 |
| YO | 81.9% | 315 |
| BB | 82.1% | 262 |
| BS | 82.6% | 706 |
| NG | 82.7% | 606 |
| NP | 82.7% | 301 |
| EX | 83.0% | 276 |
| PL | 83.1% | 362 |
| SA | 83.2% | 328 |
| BD | 83.3% | 323 |
| ST | 83.6% | 360 |
| HU | 83.7% | 276 |
| WR | 83.9% | 261 |
| CF | 84.0% | 643 |
| TS | 84.2% | 310 |
| SK | 84.5% | 446 |
| CW | 84.8% | 224 |
| RG | 84.9% | 443 |
| SN | 84.9% | 352 |
| CM | 85.0% | 266 |
| BN | 85.0% | 594 |
| NE | 85.4% | 597 |
| WF | 85.4% | 254 |
| BA | 85.5% | 351 |
| PR | 85.5% | 214 |
| WA | 85.6% | 284 |
| HP | 85.6% | 327 |
| OX | 85.7% | 593 |
| ME | 85.7% | 426 |
| TR | 85.7% | 203 |
| CT | 85.9% | 262 |
| SG | 86.0% | 235 |
| DN | 86.0% | 349 |
| CV | 86.0% | 451 |
| TN | 86.1% | 588 |
| NN | 86.3% | 410 |
| L | 86.6% | 284 |
| DE | 86.7% | 360 |
| NR | 86.8% | 493 |
| IP | 87.1% | 309 |
| M | 87.1% | 518 |
| BH | 87.1% | 294 |
| SO | 87.2% | 444 |
| MK | 87.6% | 410 |
| DY | 87.6% | 202 |
| B | 87.7% | 827 |
| LL | 87.7% | 268 |
| RH | 88.0% | 467 |
| KT | 88.0% | 309 |
| GL | 88.1% | 513 |
| S | 88.3% | 797 |
| CB | 88.4% | 275 |
| PO | 88.4% | 543 |
| GU | 88.7% | 450 |
| LE | 89.0% | 426 |
| PE | 89.1% | 457 |
| CH | 89.5% | 370 |
“vs national” is against this model's own rate across all years (86.9%), not against the national rate for all cars — a number that would flatter a new model and punish an old one.
What this cannot tell you
- Which garage to use. There is no test-station field in the anonymised data, so no station is implicated by any of this — why. The station directory lists what is near you.
- That the area causes it. Cars in some areas do more short trips, see more salt, or have owners who wait for an advisory to become a failure. The test cannot separate those.
- Anything about a single car. These are rates over hundreds or thousands of tests, not a prediction for one vehicle — one car with a bad exhaust is one car with a bad exhaust.
For context, this model's best area runs 3 points above its own all-years national rate.