2005 Peugeot 1007 MOT pass rate

Pass rate

72.5%

Below average — 0.1 pts ahead of the 72.4% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 1,998 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £23–£61

Which year to buy

  • Best 2007 76.0% pass
  • Avoid 2005 72.5% pass · this year

Across the 4 years on record, a spread of 3.5 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
63.9%
Typical mileage
67k mi

The 2005 Peugeot 1007 MOT pass rate is 72.5% of its MOT tests — about what its age and mileage predict. Suspension is the biggest single reason it fails, at 22.0% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2005 Peugeot 1007 on the real record

72.5% of 2005 Peugeot 1007 MOTs passed — 1,998 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Check your postcode

MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Peugeot 1007 does in your corner of the country.

How one model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Expert verdict

Fewer problems with tyres

Tyres are 14.5% of this car’s recorded faults, against 19.8% nationally — the mirror image of the usual story on a car of this age.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Peugeot 1007? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2005 Peugeot 1007 compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 72.4%, so this figure is 0.1 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 63.9%. The median 2005 Peugeot 1007 in this dataset had covered 66,803 mi.

The most common fuel recorded here is Petrol — 88% of tests, with a 73.0% pass rate. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 73.9% of the time, April–September 70.9%.

The single most recorded failure item is "Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources", noted on 4.40% of tests.

  • 1,998 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 72.5% overall pass rate, 63.9% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Peugeot 1007, the average is 74.2% — best year 2007 (76.0%), worst 2005 (72.5%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
1,998
Typical mileage (median)
66,803 mi
Make and model
Peugeot 1007
Updated
2026-11-05

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Number Plate Lamp

Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.

Does mileage affect the 1007 MOT pass rate?

0-30k 83.7%
30-60k 73.6%
60-90k 72.2%
90-120k 69.6%
120k+ 66.0%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 58% so small gaps stay visible.

Fuel type and reliability

Petrol 73.0%
Diesel 68.7%

Pass rate by fuel type. Petrol is the most common here (88% of tests).

Regional pass rates for the 1007

Region Tests Pass rate
South East 418 78.0%
South West 319 69.0%
West Midlands 217 74.7%
North West 214 68.7%
East of England 194 72.2%
East Midlands 180 72.8%
Yorkshire 138 68.8%
Wales 97 72.2%
London 77 83.1%
Scotland 76 63.2%
North East 68 66.2%

Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.

What fails a 2005 1007

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Suspension 22.0%
+1.0 pts vs national national 21.0% Price suspension parts
Brakes 18.7%
−2.2 pts vs national national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Lamps & electrics 15.5%
+3.3 pts vs national national 12.2% Order bulbs & wipers
Tyres 14.5%
−5.3 pts vs national national 19.8% Compare tyre prices
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Body & chassis 10.2%
  • Emissions & leaks 6.4%
  • Visibility 4.7%
  • Advisories 2.8%
  • Steering 2.0%
  • Seat belts 1.4%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2005 Peugeot 1007 tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2005 1007

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check the lights 4.4% of tests

    “registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”

    Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.

  2. Check the coil springs 3.5% of tests

    “coil spring fractured or broken”

    Look up inside each wheel arch with a torch, all the way round the spring. A snapped spring usually breaks at the very bottom coil, where a quick glance will not reach.

  3. Check the suspension joints 2.9% of tests

    “ball joint excessively worn”

    With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2005 1007 through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £23–£61 — and 53% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£23–£61
Cheapest common item: registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the…
£5–£20
Dearest common item: windscreen damaged
£80–£200
Common items a careful owner can do at home
70%
Repairs that still cost under £30
53%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 1,998 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the 1007, side by side

4 model years on record, from 2005 to 2008. Across them the pass rate runs from 72.5% to 76.0% — a spread of 3.5 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2005 72.5%
    registration plate lamp(s)…
  2. 2006 74.3% registration plate lamp(s)…
  3. 2007 76.0% registration plate lamp(s)…
  4. 2008 72.6% registration plate lamp(s)…

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2005 Peugeot 1007 with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2005 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2005 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2005 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2005 Peugeot 1007 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 5,111 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Suspension 1,144 22.00% 20.98% +1.02
Brakes 976 18.70% 20.89% −2.19
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 807 15.50% 12.21% +3.29
Tyres 753 14.50% 19.76% −5.26
Body, chassis, structure 531 10.20% 5.57% +4.63
Noise, emissions and leaks 332 6.40% 5.52% +0.88
Visibility 244 4.70% 4.97% −0.27
Non-component advisories 145 2.80% 4.18% −1.38
Steering 105 2.00% 2.57% −0.57
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 74 1.40% 0.82% +0.58

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 1,998 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 4.4% £5–20 Number Plate Lamp →
Coil spring fractured or broken Suspension Major 3.5% £25–65 Coil Spring →
Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 3.1% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Ball joint excessively worn Suspension Major 2.9% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility Minor 2.6% £80–200 Windscreen →
Wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility Major 2.6% £8–22 Wiper Blade →
Headlamp lens slightly defective Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 2.4% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Horn not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 2.4% £8–25 Horn →
Service brake performance excessively binding Brakes Major 2.2% £60–150 Brake Servicing →
Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 2.1% £30–80 Headlight Alignment →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes Advisory 16.7% £45–110
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Advisory 16.7% £45–95
Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres Advisory 13.7% £45–95
Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks Advisory 12.5% £200–700
Coil spring corroded so that its cross sectional area is reduced and seriously weakened Suspension Advisory 10.5% £25–65
Exhaust system has a major leak of exhaust gases Body, chassis, structure Advisory 10.1% £45–120

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
0-30k 104 83.7% 23,200 mi
30-60k 671 73.6% 47,083 mi
60-90k 824 72.2% 73,874 mi
90-120k 299 69.6% 101,031 mi
120k+ 97 66.0% 137,300 mi

Source: 1,998 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2005 1007 MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2005 Peugeot 1007?

72.5% of the 1,998 2005 Peugeot 1007 tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.4% for cars first used in 2005. First-attempt pass rate: 63.9%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2005 Peugeot 1007?

The three most recorded items are registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (4.40%), coil spring fractured or broken (3.55%), position lamp not working (3.15%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2005 Peugeot 1007 MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 83.7% of the time, falling to 66.0% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2005 Peugeot 1007 in this dataset had covered 66,803 mi.

Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2005 Peugeot 1007?

Petrol: 73.0% pass rate across 1,749 tests. Diesel: 68.7% pass rate across 249 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.

Does the season affect the 2005 Peugeot 1007 MOT pass rate?

Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 73.9% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 70.9%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.