2005 Peugeot 607 MOT pass rate

Pass rate

81.5%

Around average — 9.1 pts ahead of the 72.4% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 119 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £38–£103

Which year to buy

  • Best 2005 81.5% pass · this year
  • Avoid 2003 66.9% pass

Across the 7 years on record, a spread of 14.6 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
78.2%
Typical mileage
132k mi

The 2005 Peugeot 607 MOT pass rate is 81.5% of its MOT tests — 9.1 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. Suspension is the biggest single reason it fails, at 26.2% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2005 Peugeot 607 on the real record

81.5% of 2005 Peugeot 607 MOTs passed — 119 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Check your postcode

MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Peugeot 607 does in your corner of the country.

How one model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Expert verdict

Fewer problems with tyres

Tyres are 10.6% of this car’s recorded faults, against 19.8% nationally — the mirror image of the usual story on a car of this age.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Peugeot 607? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2005 Peugeot 607 compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 72.4%, so this figure is 9.1 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 78.2%. The median 2005 Peugeot 607 in this dataset had covered 131,560 mi.

80% of the tests on this vehicle ran on Diesel, which passed 83.2% of the time. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 82.4% of the time, April–September 80.4%.

The single most recorded failure item is "Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view", noted on 10.08% of tests.

  • 119 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 81.5% overall pass rate, 78.2% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Peugeot 607, the average is 74.8% — best year 2005 (81.5%), worst 2003 (66.9%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
119
Typical mileage (median)
131,560 mi
Make and model
Peugeot 607
Updated
2026-11-05

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Windscreen

Typically a garage job — get quotes before committing.

Does mileage affect the 607 MOT pass rate?

0-30k 50.0%
30-60k 100.0%
60-90k 85.0%
90-120k 72.2%
120k+ 83.1%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 42% so small gaps stay visible.

Fuel type and reliability

Diesel 83.2%
Petrol 75.0%

Pass rate by fuel type. Diesel is the most common here (80% of tests).

Regional pass rates for the 607

Region Tests Pass rate
South East 28 71.4%
East of England 22 86.4%
West Midlands 18 77.8%
North West 16 87.5%

Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.

What fails a 2005 607

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Suspension 26.2%
+5.2 pts vs national national 21.0% Price suspension parts
Brakes 18.4%
−2.5 pts vs national national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Lamps & electrics 12.1%
in line with the national share national 12.2% Order bulbs & wipers
Tyres 10.6%
−9.2 pts vs national national 19.8% Compare tyre prices
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Emissions & leaks 8.7%
  • Visibility 6.9%
  • Body & chassis 5.6%
  • Advisories 4.7%
  • Steering 4.4%
  • Seat belts 1.2%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2005 Peugeot 607 tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2005 607

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check the windscreen 10.1% of tests

    “windscreen damaged”

    Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.

  2. Check the lights 7.6% of tests

    “registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”

    Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.

  3. Check the suspension joints 4.2% of tests

    “ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”

    With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2005 607 through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £38–£103 — and 40% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£38–£103
Cheapest common item: registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the…
£5–£20
Dearest common item: joints constant velocity boot severely…
£80–£250
Common items a careful owner can do at home
70%
Repairs that still cost under £30
40%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 119 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the 607, side by side

7 model years on record, from 2002 to 2008. Across them the pass rate runs from 66.9% to 81.5% — a spread of 14.6 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2002 74.4% joints constant velocity boot…
  2. 2003 66.9% registration plate lamp(s)…
  3. 2004 73.1% joints constant velocity boot…
  4. 2005 81.5%
    windscreen damaged but not…
  5. 2006 80.5% joints constant velocity boot…
  6. 2007 76.1% joints constant velocity boot…
  7. 2008 73.6% joints constant velocity boot…

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2005 Peugeot 607 with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2005 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2005 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2005 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2005 Peugeot 607 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 317 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Suspension 84 26.20% 20.98% +5.22
Brakes 59 18.40% 20.89% −2.49
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 39 12.10% 12.21% −0.11
Tyres 34 10.60% 19.76% −9.16
Noise, emissions and leaks 28 8.70% 5.52% +3.18
Visibility 22 6.90% 4.97% +1.93
Body, chassis, structure 18 5.60% 5.57% +0.03
Non-component advisories 15 4.70% 4.18% +0.52
Steering 14 4.40% 2.57% +1.83
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 4 1.20% 0.82% +0.38

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 119 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility Minor 10.1% £80–200 Windscreen →
Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 7.6% £5–20 Number Plate Lamp →
Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension Minor 4.2% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure Minor 4.2% £80–250 Body Panel Repair →
Wipers blade defective Visibility Minor 4.2% £8–22 Wiper Blade →
Has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords Tyres Major 2.5% £45–95 Tyres →
Headlamp not working on dipped beam Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Rectified 2.5% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Rectified 2.5% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Service brake performance excessively binding Brakes Major 2.5% £60–150 Brake Servicing →
Ball joint dust cover no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Suspension Major 1.7% £18–45 Ball Joint →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks Advisory 18.5% £200–700
Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes Advisory 16.0% £45–110
Shock absorbers has a serious fluid leak Suspension Advisory 13.4% £30–75
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Advisory 11.8% £45–95
Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres Advisory 10.9% £45–95
Sub-frame corroded and seriously weakened Suspension Advisory 10.1% £180–450

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
0-30k 2 50.0% 27,864 mi
30-60k 2 100.0% 32,944 mi
60-90k 20 85.0% 77,560 mi
90-120k 18 72.2% 100,951 mi
120k+ 77 83.1% 155,048 mi

Source: 119 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2005 607 MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2005 Peugeot 607?

81.5% of the 119 2005 Peugeot 607 tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.4% for cars first used in 2005. First-attempt pass rate: 78.2%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2005 Peugeot 607?

The three most recorded items are windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (10.08%), registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (7.56%), ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (4.20%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2005 Peugeot 607 MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 50.0% of the time, falling to 83.1% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2005 Peugeot 607 in this dataset had covered 131,560 mi.

Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2005 Peugeot 607?

Diesel: 83.2% pass rate across 95 tests. Petrol: 75.0% pass rate across 24 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.

Does the season affect the 2005 Peugeot 607 MOT pass rate?

Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 82.4% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 80.4%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.