Pass rate
86.1%
Above average — 3.4 pts behind the 89.5% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 267 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £40–£88
2019 Volvo XC60 Rdesign Pro MOT pass rate
- 2019
- typical 42,806 mi
Most common fault
Tyres
56.7% of faults · 19.8% nationally
mostly tread below the limit, cuts and sidewall bulges.
Part only £55–£85 for Tread depth below 1.6 mm. What fitting it takes →
Which year to buy
- Best 2020 91.7% pass
- Avoid 2019 86.1% pass · this year
Across the 4 years on record, a spread of 5.6 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 84.1%
- Typical mileage
- 43k mi
The 2019 Volvo XC60 Rdesign Pro MOT pass rate is 86.1% of its MOT tests — 3.4 points behind what its age and mileage predict. Tyres is the biggest single reason it fails, at 56.7% of what testers record.
Check your postcode
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Volvo XC60 Rdesign Pro does in your corner of the country.
Expert verdict
Tyres: 2.9× the national share
Tyres make up 56.7% of everything recorded on the 2019 Volvo Xc60 Rdesign Pro, against 19.8% nationally — 36.9 points above. Check all four tyres yourself, including the inner shoulders, and look at the date stamp — a tyre can pass on tread and still be six years old.
- Falls short of its own age and mileage. Like-for-like, cars this age and mileage expect about 89.5%; this one manages 86.1% — 3.4 points below. Age is a fair excuse; this is not age.
- When it fails, it costs. Only 14% of this model’s typical repairs come in under £30 in parts — the failures here tend to be the kind that need a garage rather than a bulb.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a Volvo XC60 Rdesign Pro? Get an email when these numbers change .
How does the 2019 Volvo XC60 Rdesign Pro compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 89.5%, so this figure is 3.4 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 84.1%. The median 2019 Volvo XC60 Rdesign Pro in this dataset had covered 42,806 mi.
Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 87.4% of the time, April–September 84.8%.
The single most recorded failure item is "Has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords", noted on 5.62% of tests.
- 267 recorded tests behind this page.
- 86.1% overall pass rate, 84.1% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the Volvo XC60 Rdesign Pro, the average is 90.7% — best year 2020 (91.7%), worst 2019 (86.1%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 267
- Typical mileage (median)
- 42,806 mi
- Make and model
- Volvo XC60 Rdesign Pro
- Updated
- 2026-11-05
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Tyres
Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.
Does mileage affect the XC60 Rdesign Pro MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 74% so small gaps stay visible.
Regional pass rates for the XC60 Rdesign Pro
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| South East | 56 | 87.5% |
| London | 36 | 72.2% |
| East of England | 33 | 81.8% |
| Yorkshire | 29 | 89.7% |
| West Midlands | 27 | 100.0% |
| East Midlands | 24 | 91.7% |
| Scotland | 23 | 82.6% |
| South West | 21 | 81.0% |
| North West | 15 | 93.3% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2019 XC60 Rdesign Pro
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2019 XC60 Rdesign Pro
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the wipers and washers 2.3% of tests
“wipers blade defective”
Run the wipers with the screen wet: they should clear it in one sweep without smearing or juddering. Top the washer bottle up and check both jets hit the screen.
-
Check the tyre tread 1.5% of tests
“tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm”
Check all four tyres cold, including the inner shoulder where wear hides — 1.6mm across the central three-quarters is the legal limit, and most testers fail at 1.6mm without argument.
-
Check the windscreen 1.1% of tests
“windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2019 XC60 Rdesign Pro through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £40–£88 — and 14% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £40–£88
- Cheapest common item: wipers blade defective
- £8–£22
- Dearest common item: windscreen damaged
- £80–£200
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 90%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 14%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 267 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the XC60 Rdesign Pro, side by side
4 model years on record, from 2019 to 2022. Across them the pass rate runs from 86.1% to 91.7% — a spread of 5.6 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2019 86.1%has a cut in excess of the…
- 2020 91.7% has a cut in excess of the…
- 2021 90.0% headlamp cleaning device for led…
- 2022 90.3% headlamp cleaning device for led…
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2019 Volvo XC60 Rdesign Pro with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2019 cars with a similar record
- Citroen C4 86.0%
- Dacia Logan 86.0%
- Ford Allied 86.0%
- Citroen C4 Cactus 85.9%
- Fiat TIPO 85.9%
- Mercedes-Benz Cls 85.9%
Closest pass rates among 2019 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2019 Volvo XC60 Rdesign Pro 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 233 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tyres | 132 | 56.70% | 19.76% | +36.94 |
| Brakes | 39 | 16.70% | 20.89% | −4.19 |
| Suspension | 19 | 8.20% | 20.98% | −12.78 |
| Non-component advisories | 17 | 7.30% | 4.18% | +3.12 |
| Visibility | 12 | 5.20% | 4.97% | +0.23 |
| Road Wheels | 5 | 2.10% | 0.75% | +1.35 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 4 | 1.70% | 12.21% | −10.51 |
| Identification of the vehicle | 3 | 1.30% | 1.76% | −0.46 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 1 | 0.40% | 5.57% | −5.17 |
| Steering | 1 | 0.40% | 2.57% | −2.17 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords Tyres | Major | 5.6% | £45–95 |
| Has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres | Major | 2.6% | £45–95 |
| Wipers blade defective Visibility | Minor | 2.3% | £8–22 |
| Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres | Major | 1.5% | £45–95 |
| Has ply or cords exposed Tyres | Major | 1.1% | £45–95 |
| Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility | Minor | 1.1% | £80–200 |
| Fractured Road Wheels | Major | 0.75% | £20–55 |
| Ball joint excessively worn Suspension | Major | 0.37% | £18–45 |
| Electronic parking brake control defective so that it cannot be satisfactorily operated Brakes | Major | 0.37% | £25–80 |
| Electronic parking brake warning indicates a malfunction Brakes | Major | 0.37% | £25–80 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres | Advisory | 12.4% | £45–95 |
| Has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords Tyres | Advisory | 11.6% | £45–95 |
| Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes | Advisory | 8.6% | £45–110 |
| Ball joint excessively worn Suspension | Advisory | 6.0% | £18–45 |
| Has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres | Advisory | 4.9% | £45–95 |
| Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres | Advisory | 4.9% | £45–95 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30k | 46 | 82.6% | 23,930 mi |
| 30-60k | 158 | 84.8% | 42,895 mi |
| 60-90k | 50 | 90.0% | 72,782 mi |
| 90-120k | 11 | 100.0% | 100,759 mi |
| 120k+ | 2 | 100.0% | 127,617 mi |
Source: 267 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2019 XC60 Rdesign Pro MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2019 Volvo XC60 Rdesign Pro?
86.1% of the 267 2019 Volvo XC60 Rdesign Pro tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 89.5% for cars first used in 2019. First-attempt pass rate: 84.1%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2019 Volvo XC60 Rdesign Pro?
The three most recorded items are has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords (5.62%), has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (2.62%), wipers blade defective (2.25%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2019 Volvo XC60 Rdesign Pro MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 82.6% of the time, falling to 100.0% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2019 Volvo XC60 Rdesign Pro in this dataset had covered 42,806 mi.
Does the season affect the 2019 Volvo XC60 Rdesign Pro MOT pass rate?
Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 87.4% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 84.8%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.