Pass rate
71.0%
Below average — 2.8 pts behind the 73.8% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 614 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £38–£106
2000 Alfa Romeo Spider MOT pass rate
- 2000
- typical 83,488 mi
Most common fault
Brakes
24.9% of faults · 20.9% nationally
mostly worn pads and discs, corroded pipes and a handbrake that will not hold.
Which year to buy
- Best 2011 86.7% pass
- Avoid 2000 71.0% pass · this year
Across the 11 years on record, a spread of 15.7 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 63.1%
- Typical mileage
- 83k mi
The 2000 Alfa Romeo Spider MOT pass rate is 71.0% of its MOT tests — 2.8 points behind what its age and mileage predict. Brakes is the biggest single reason it fails, at 24.9% of what testers record.
Check your postcode
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Alfa Romeo Spider does in your corner of the country.
Expert verdict
Emissions & leaks: 2.1× the national share
Emissions & leaks make up 11.7% of everything recorded on the 2000 Alfa Romeo Spider, against 5.5% nationally — 6.2 points above. Brakes are still the single largest share at 24.9%, but at 20.9% nationally that one is ordinary. A smoky diesel or a leaking joint fails on emissions more often than on wear, so ask for a recent emissions printout.
- When it fails, it costs. Only 28% of this model’s typical repairs come in under £30 in parts — the failures here tend to be the kind that need a garage rather than a bulb.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a Alfa Romeo Spider? Get an email when these numbers change .
How does the 2000 Alfa Romeo Spider compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 73.8%, so this figure is 2.8 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 63.1%. The median 2000 Alfa Romeo Spider in this dataset had covered 83,488 mi.
Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 70.3% of the time, April–September 71.3%.
The single most recorded failure item is "Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements", noted on 9.93% of tests.
- 614 recorded tests behind this page.
- 71.0% overall pass rate, 63.1% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the Alfa Romeo Spider, the average is 79.0% — best year 2011 (86.7%), worst 2000 (71.0%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 614
- Typical mileage (median)
- 83,488 mi
- Make and model
- Alfa Romeo Spider
- Updated
- 2026-11-05
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Brake Discs and Pads Set
Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.
Does mileage affect the Spider MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 52% so small gaps stay visible.
Regional pass rates for the Spider
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| South East | 150 | 72.0% |
| South West | 119 | 68.9% |
| East of England | 67 | 67.2% |
| West Midlands | 58 | 79.3% |
| East Midlands | 48 | 64.6% |
| Yorkshire | 44 | 72.7% |
| North West | 44 | 72.7% |
| Scotland | 37 | 67.6% |
| London | 16 | 81.3% |
| North East | 16 | 75.0% |
| Wales | 15 | 66.7% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2000 Spider
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2000 Spider
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the lights 5.4% of tests
“srs malfunction indicator lamp warning lamp indicates a fault”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
-
Check the suspension joints 4.1% of tests
“ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”
With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.
-
Check the wipers and washers 3.3% of tests
“wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively”
Run the wipers with the screen wet: they should clear it in one sweep without smearing or juddering. Top the washer bottle up and check both jets hit the screen.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2000 Spider through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £38–£106 — and 28% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £38–£106
- Cheapest common item: srs malfunction indicator lamp warning lamp…
- £3–£12
- Dearest common item: joints constant velocity boot split or…
- £80–£250
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 50%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 28%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 614 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the Spider, side by side
11 model years on record, from 2000 to 2011. Across them the pass rate runs from 71.0% to 86.7% — a spread of 15.7 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2000 71.0%rbt (sp) efficiency below…
- 2001 78.5% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
- 2002 78.5% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
- 2003 71.3% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
- 2004 83.5% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2005 80.1% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
- 2007 79.3% coil spring fractured or broken
- 2008 79.7% coil spring fractured or broken
- 2009 85.5% coil spring fractured or broken
- 2010 85.7% coil spring fractured or broken
- 2011 86.7% coil spring fractured or broken
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2000 Alfa Romeo Spider with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2000 cars with a similar record
- Toyota YARIS 71.7%
- Vauxhall Astra 71.7%
- Volkswagen Polo 71.8%
- Vauxhall Corsa 71.9%
- Ford Mondeo 70.1%
- Jaguar S-Type 71.9%
Closest pass rates among 2000 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2000 Alfa Romeo Spider 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 1,776 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brakes | 449 | 24.90% | 20.89% | +4.01 |
| Suspension | 440 | 24.40% | 20.98% | +3.42 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 211 | 11.70% | 5.52% | +6.18 |
| Tyres | 170 | 9.40% | 19.76% | −10.36 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 169 | 9.40% | 5.57% | +3.83 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 109 | 6.00% | 12.21% | −6.21 |
| Visibility | 73 | 4.00% | 4.97% | −0.97 |
| Non-component advisories | 55 | 3.00% | 4.18% | −1.18 |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 54 | 3.00% | 0.82% | +2.18 |
| Steering | 46 | 2.50% | 2.57% | −0.07 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements Brakes | Major | 9.9% | £45–110 |
| Srs malfunction indicator lamp warning lamp indicates a fault Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Major | 5.4% | £3–12 |
| Joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body, chassis, structure | Major | 5.2% | £80–250 |
| Service brake performance efficiency below requirements Brakes | Major | 4.4% | £60–150 |
| Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension | Minor | 4.1% | £18–45 |
| Wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility | Major | 3.3% | £8–22 |
| Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 3.1% | £5–20 |
| Exhaust system has a major leak of exhaust gases Body, chassis, structure | Major | 2.4% | £45–120 |
| Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure | Minor | 2.4% | £80–250 |
| Headlamp aim too low Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 2.3% | £30–80 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks | Advisory | 21.3% | £200–700 |
| Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes | Advisory | 20.0% | £45–110 |
| Coil spring corroded so that its cross sectional area is reduced and seriously weakened Suspension | Advisory | 19.1% | £25–65 |
| Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres | Advisory | 13.2% | £45–95 |
| Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres | Advisory | 10.3% | £45–95 |
| Exhaust system has a major leak of exhaust gases Body, chassis, structure | Advisory | 9.9% | £45–120 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30k | 9 | 100.0% | 11,680 mi |
| 30-60k | 123 | 74.8% | 48,084 mi |
| 60-90k | 227 | 73.6% | 77,044 mi |
| 90-120k | 152 | 68.4% | 100,937 mi |
| 120k+ | 89 | 60.7% | 139,486 mi |
Source: 614 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2000 Spider MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2000 Alfa Romeo Spider?
71.0% of the 614 2000 Alfa Romeo Spider tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 73.8% for cars first used in 2000. First-attempt pass rate: 63.1%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2000 Alfa Romeo Spider?
The three most recorded items are rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements (9.93%), srs malfunction indicator lamp warning lamp indicates a fault (5.37%), joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt (5.21%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2000 Alfa Romeo Spider MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 100.0% of the time, falling to 60.7% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2000 Alfa Romeo Spider in this dataset had covered 83,488 mi.
Does the season affect the 2000 Alfa Romeo Spider MOT pass rate?
Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 70.3% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 71.3%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.