Audi Tt 2007 MOT pass rate by postcode area
The Audi Tt 2007 MOT pass rate by postcode area runs from 86.9% in N down to 67.9% in AB — 19 points apart for the same model, the same model year and the same test. Below are all 64 postcode areas that tested enough of them to publish.
What a 19-point gap means
Pinned to one model year, this is not a table of old cars: every 2007 Audi Tt in the data is the same age. Over five annual MOTs the gap between the best and worst area is 0.9 extra failures — about £37–£100 in parts at this model's typical failure cost .
50 of 170 models by how far apart their best and worst postcode area are. Wider: Vauxhall Astra (19.1). Narrower: Ford Ranger (19).
Rates are for the 2007 model year only, in areas with at least 200 tests of it. Mileage, trim and use are pooled — a city van and a motorway van are one line here. Method. Compare it with the model's full history or this exact year.
Every postcode area, worst first
| Area | Pass rate | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| AB | 67.9% | 218 |
| EX | 69.9% | 322 |
| BS | 69.9% | 638 |
| PL | 70.0% | 267 |
| TR | 70.4% | 213 |
| CF | 71.9% | 405 |
| GL | 71.9% | 467 |
| PO | 72.6% | 530 |
| ST | 72.9% | 288 |
| SN | 73.2% | 280 |
| SA | 73.5% | 310 |
| BN | 73.6% | 387 |
| NP | 73.7% | 228 |
| CH | 73.8% | 347 |
| BH | 74.1% | 378 |
| NR | 74.4% | 430 |
| G | 74.9% | 315 |
| YO | 75.0% | 236 |
| SK | 75.2% | 266 |
| LS | 75.3% | 279 |
| BA | 75.4% | 284 |
| CB | 75.4% | 228 |
| EH | 75.7% | 300 |
| RG | 75.8% | 505 |
| TN | 75.9% | 515 |
| IP | 76.2% | 403 |
| PR | 76.3% | 211 |
| MK | 76.4% | 424 |
| WS | 76.5% | 204 |
| RH | 76.5% | 362 |
| NG | 76.5% | 558 |
| DN | 76.7% | 335 |
| NN | 76.8% | 449 |
| OX | 76.9% | 333 |
| ME | 76.9% | 342 |
| CO | 77.0% | 244 |
| PE | 77.1% | 506 |
| WA | 77.2% | 228 |
| SO | 77.4% | 367 |
| CM | 77.7% | 503 |
| HP | 77.9% | 285 |
| LL | 78.0% | 286 |
| BB | 78.3% | 212 |
| CV | 78.3% | 383 |
| NE | 78.4% | 417 |
| LE | 78.8% | 504 |
| DE | 79.5% | 385 |
| GU | 79.5% | 484 |
| KT | 79.8% | 377 |
| SS | 79.9% | 328 |
| SW | 80.1% | 231 |
| SG | 80.4% | 255 |
| S | 81.0% | 521 |
| NW | 81.6% | 212 |
| M | 81.9% | 288 |
| CR | 83.1% | 338 |
| TW | 83.3% | 210 |
| SL | 83.6% | 268 |
| SE | 83.6% | 396 |
| EN | 83.8% | 229 |
| B | 84.6% | 848 |
| E | 86.2% | 246 |
| RM | 86.8% | 234 |
| N | 86.9% | 290 |
“vs national” is against this model's own rate across all years (82.7%), not against the national rate for all cars — a number that would flatter a new model and punish an old one.
What this cannot tell you
- Which garage to use. There is no test-station field in the anonymised data, so no station is implicated by any of this — why. The station directory lists what is near you.
- That the area causes it. Cars in some areas do more short trips, see more salt, or have owners who wait for an advisory to become a failure. The test cannot separate those.
- Anything about a single car. These are rates over hundreds or thousands of tests, not a prediction for one vehicle — one car with a bad exhaust is one car with a bad exhaust.
For context, this model's best area runs 4 points above its own all-years national rate.