2002 Chrysler Voyager MOT pass rate

Only 92 tests of this exact model and year are in the DVSA data, below the 100 we ask for before a page goes in the index. The figures are still shown, because they are the only ones there are.

Pass rate

63.0%

Below average — 9.9 pts behind the 72.9% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 92 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £58–£153

Which year to buy

  • Best 2001 74.6% pass
  • Avoid 2002 63.0% pass · this year

Across the 10 years on record, a spread of 11.6 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
49.3%
Typical mileage
117k mi

The 2002 Chrysler Voyager MOT pass rate is 63.0% of its MOT tests — 9.9 points behind what its age and mileage predict. Suspension is the biggest single reason it fails, at 25.4% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2002 Chrysler Voyager on the real record

63.0% of 2002 Chrysler Voyager MOTs passed — 92 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Check your postcode

MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Chrysler Voyager does in your corner of the country.

How one model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Expert verdict

Fewer problems with tyres

Tyres are 9.4% of this car’s recorded faults, against 19.8% nationally — the mirror image of the usual story on a car of this age.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Chrysler Voyager? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2002 Chrysler Voyager compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 72.9%, so this figure is 9.9 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 49.3%. The median 2002 Chrysler Voyager in this dataset had covered 116,815 mi.

52% of the tests on this vehicle ran on Diesel, which passed 64.6% of the time. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 63.6% of the time, April–September 62.5%.

The single most recorded failure item is "Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources", noted on 8.70% of tests.

  • 92 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 63.0% overall pass rate, 49.3% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Chrysler Voyager, the average is 69.4% — best year 2001 (74.6%), worst 2002 (63.0%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
92
Typical mileage (median)
116,815 mi
Make and model
Chrysler Voyager
Updated
2026-11-05

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Number Plate Lamp

Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.

Does mileage affect the Voyager MOT pass rate?

30-60k 66.7%
60-90k 72.2%
90-120k 55.6%
120k+ 63.6%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 47% so small gaps stay visible.

Fuel type and reliability

Diesel 64.6%
Petrol 60.5%

Pass rate by fuel type. Diesel is the most common here (52% of tests).

Regional pass rates for the Voyager

Region Tests Pass rate
South East 34 67.6%
East of England 15 46.7%

Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.

What fails a 2002 Voyager

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Suspension 25.4%
+4.4 pts vs national national 21.0% Price suspension parts
Brakes 20.7%
in line with the national share national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Lamps & electrics 14.6%
+2.4 pts vs national national 12.2% Order bulbs & wipers
Tyres 9.4%
−10.4 pts vs national national 19.8% Compare tyre prices
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Body & chassis 8.3%
  • Advisories 7.6%
  • Emissions & leaks 6.3%
  • Identification 2.7%
  • Steering 2.2%
  • Visibility 2.0%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2002 Chrysler Voyager tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2002 Voyager

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check the lights 8.7% of tests

    “registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”

    Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.

  2. Check corrosion 7.6% of tests

    “integral vehicle structure condition corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced”

    Look under the sills, around the jacking points and where the suspension mounts meet the body. Flaking, holed or crumbly metal fails; a brown stain on sound metal does not.

  3. Check the battery 3.3% of tests

    “battery(ies) insecure”

    Check the battery is secure and its terminals are clean and tight — a loose battery is a fail on its own, and a weak one shows up as slow cranking on a cold morning.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2002 Voyager through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £58–£153 — and 52% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£58–£153
Cheapest common item: stop lamp not working
£3–£12
Dearest common item: integral vehicle structure condition corroded…
£180–£450
Common items a careful owner can do at home
70%
Repairs that still cost under £30
52%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 92 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the Voyager, side by side

10 model years on record, from 2001 to 2010. Across them the pass rate runs from 63.0% to 74.6% — a spread of 11.6 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2001 74.6% windscreen damaged but not…
  2. 2002 63.0%
    registration plate lamp(s)…
  3. 2003 68.2% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
  4. 2004 70.8% registration plate lamp(s)…
  5. 2005 67.9% registration plate lamp(s)…
  6. 2006 69.0% headlamp lens slightly defective
  7. 2007 68.7% headlamp lens slightly defective
  8. 2008 70.7% registration plate lamp(s)…
  9. 2009 71.3% registration plate lamp(s)…
  10. 2010 66.0% position lamp not working

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2002 Chrysler Voyager with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2002 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2002 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2002 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2002 Chrysler Voyager 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 442 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Suspension 113 25.40% 20.98% +4.42
Brakes 92 20.70% 20.89% −0.19
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 65 14.60% 12.21% +2.39
Tyres 42 9.40% 19.76% −10.36
Body, chassis, structure 37 8.30% 5.57% +2.73
Non-component advisories 34 7.60% 4.18% +3.42
Noise, emissions and leaks 28 6.30% 5.52% +0.78
Identification of the vehicle 12 2.70% 1.76% +0.94
Steering 10 2.20% 2.57% −0.37
Visibility 9 2.00% 4.97% −2.97

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 92 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 8.7% £5–20 Number Plate Lamp →
Integral vehicle structure condition corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced Body, chassis, structure Major 7.6% £180–450 Corrosion Welding Repair →
Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 7.6% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements Brakes Major 7.6% £45–110 Brake Discs and Pads Set →
Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension Major 6.5% £180–450 Corrosion Welding Repair →
Stop lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 6.5% £3–12 Stop Light Bulb →
Headlamp lens slightly defective Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 5.4% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body, chassis, structure Major 5.4% £80–250 Body Panel Repair →
Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of a single lamp or all lamps Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 4.3% £5–20 Number Plate Lamp →
Battery(ies) insecure but not likely to fall from carrier Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 3.3% £60–140 Battery →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes Advisory 29.4% £80–180
Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks Advisory 28.3% £200–700
Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes Advisory 22.8% £45–110
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Advisory 21.7% £45–95
Non-component advisories Play in steering rack inner joint(s) Non-component advisories Advisory 18.5% £120–300
Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres Advisory 17.4% £45–95

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
30-60k 3 66.7% 52,908 mi
60-90k 18 72.2% 76,062 mi
90-120k 27 55.6% 104,779 mi
120k+ 44 63.6% 159,358 mi

Source: 92 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2002 Voyager MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2002 Chrysler Voyager?

63.0% of the 92 2002 Chrysler Voyager tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.9% for cars first used in 2002. First-attempt pass rate: 49.3%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2002 Chrysler Voyager?

The three most recorded items are registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (8.70%), integral vehicle structure condition corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced (7.61%), position lamp not working (7.61%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2002 Chrysler Voyager MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 66.7% of the time, falling to 63.6% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2002 Chrysler Voyager in this dataset had covered 116,815 mi.

Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2002 Chrysler Voyager?

Diesel: 64.6% pass rate across 48 tests. Petrol: 60.5% pass rate across 43 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.

Does the season affect the 2002 Chrysler Voyager MOT pass rate?

Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 63.6% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 62.5%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.