Pass rate
69.0%
Below average — 3.5 pts behind the 72.5% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 678 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £37–£102
2006 Chrysler Voyager MOT pass rate
- 2006
- typical 110,341 mi
Most common fault
Brakes
22.6% of faults · 20.9% nationally
mostly worn pads and discs, corroded pipes and a handbrake that will not hold.
Which year to buy
- Best 2001 74.6% pass
- Avoid 2002 63.0% pass
Across the 10 years on record, a spread of 11.6 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 59.4%
- Typical mileage
- 110k mi
The 2006 Chrysler Voyager MOT pass rate is 69.0% of its MOT tests — 3.5 points behind what its age and mileage predict. Brakes is the biggest single reason it fails, at 22.6% of what testers record.
Check your postcode
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Chrysler Voyager does in your corner of the country.
Expert verdict
Fewer problems with tyres
Tyres are 9.5% of this car’s recorded faults, against 19.8% nationally — the mirror image of the usual story on a car of this age.
- Falls short of its own age and mileage. Like-for-like, cars this age and mileage expect about 72.5%; this one manages 69.0% — 3.5 points below. Age is a fair excuse; this is not age.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a Chrysler Voyager? Get an email when these numbers change .
How does the 2006 Chrysler Voyager compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 72.5%, so this figure is 3.5 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 59.4%. The median 2006 Chrysler Voyager in this dataset had covered 110,341 mi.
87% of the tests on this vehicle ran on Diesel, which passed 67.9% of the time. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 67.3% of the time, April–September 71.2%.
The single most recorded failure item is "Headlamp lens slightly defective", noted on 7.82% of tests.
- 678 recorded tests behind this page.
- 69.0% overall pass rate, 59.4% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the Chrysler Voyager, the average is 69.4% — best year 2001 (74.6%), worst 2002 (63.0%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 678
- Typical mileage (median)
- 110,341 mi
- Make and model
- Chrysler Voyager
- Updated
- 2026-11-05
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Headlight Bulb
Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.
Does mileage affect the Voyager MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 58% so small gaps stay visible.
Fuel type and reliability
Pass rate by fuel type. Diesel is the most common here (87% of tests).
Regional pass rates for the Voyager
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| South East | 176 | 70.5% |
| West Midlands | 84 | 72.6% |
| East of England | 79 | 72.2% |
| North West | 72 | 68.1% |
| East Midlands | 63 | 69.8% |
| South West | 59 | 52.5% |
| Yorkshire | 36 | 77.8% |
| London | 35 | 82.9% |
| Wales | 32 | 65.6% |
| North East | 22 | 54.5% |
| Scotland | 20 | 60.0% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2006 Voyager
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2006 Voyager
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the lights 7.8% of tests
“headlamp lens slightly defective”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
-
Check the windscreen 4.4% of tests
“windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
-
Check corrosion 3.8% of tests
“component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength”
Look under the sills, around the jacking points and where the suspension mounts meet the body. Flaking, holed or crumbly metal fails; a brown stain on sound metal does not.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2006 Voyager through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £37–£102 — and 51% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £37–£102
- Cheapest common item: anti-lock braking system warning lamp…
- £3–£15
- Dearest common item: component mounting prescribed areas…
- £180–£450
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 70%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 51%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 678 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the Voyager, side by side
10 model years on record, from 2001 to 2010. Across them the pass rate runs from 63.0% to 74.6% — a spread of 11.6 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2001 74.6% windscreen damaged but not…
- 2002 63.0% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2003 68.2% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
- 2004 70.8% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2005 67.9% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2006 69.0%headlamp lens slightly defective
- 2007 68.7% headlamp lens slightly defective
- 2008 70.7% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2009 71.3% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2010 66.0% position lamp not working
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2006 Chrysler Voyager with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2006 cars with a similar record
- Hyundai Coupe 69.0%
- Vauxhall Corsa 69.1%
- Fiat Panda 69.2%
- Renault Scenic 68.8%
- Renault Grand Scenic 68.8%
- Volkswagen Polo 68.7%
Closest pass rates among 2006 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2006 Chrysler Voyager 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 2,725 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brakes | 625 | 22.60% | 20.89% | +1.71 |
| Suspension | 589 | 21.30% | 20.98% | +0.32 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 405 | 14.70% | 12.21% | +2.49 |
| Tyres | 263 | 9.50% | 19.76% | −10.26 |
| Non-component advisories | 212 | 7.70% | 4.18% | +3.52 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 195 | 7.10% | 5.57% | +1.53 |
| Steering | 188 | 6.80% | 2.57% | +4.23 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 124 | 4.50% | 5.52% | −1.02 |
| Visibility | 74 | 2.70% | 4.97% | −2.27 |
| Identification of the vehicle | 50 | 1.80% | 1.76% | +0.04 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Headlamp lens slightly defective Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 7.8% | £5–25 |
| Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 7.2% | £5–20 |
| Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements Brakes | Major | 5.5% | £45–110 |
| Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 4.9% | £5–25 |
| Anti-lock braking system warning lamp indicates an ABS fault Brakes | Major | 4.4% | £3–15 |
| Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility | Minor | 4.4% | £80–200 |
| Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension | Major | 3.8% | £180–450 |
| Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure | Minor | 3.4% | £80–250 |
| Track rod end ball joint has excessive play Steering | Major | 3.2% | £18–45 |
| Ball joint excessively worn Suspension | Major | 3.0% | £18–45 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes | Advisory | 23.9% | £80–180 |
| Non-component advisories Play in steering rack inner joint(s) Non-component advisories | Advisory | 19.3% | £120–300 |
| Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres | Advisory | 18.3% | £45–95 |
| Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks | Advisory | 14.4% | £200–700 |
| Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes | Advisory | 14.2% | £45–110 |
| Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres | Advisory | 12.2% | £45–95 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30k | 3 | 100.0% | 17,168 mi |
| 30-60k | 32 | 81.3% | 51,493 mi |
| 60-90k | 129 | 72.1% | 77,830 mi |
| 90-120k | 264 | 67.8% | 105,739 mi |
| 120k+ | 250 | 66.8% | 151,635 mi |
Source: 678 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2006 Voyager MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2006 Chrysler Voyager?
69.0% of the 678 2006 Chrysler Voyager tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.5% for cars first used in 2006. First-attempt pass rate: 59.4%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2006 Chrysler Voyager?
The three most recorded items are headlamp lens slightly defective (7.82%), registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (7.23%), rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements (5.46%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2006 Chrysler Voyager MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 100.0% of the time, falling to 66.8% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2006 Chrysler Voyager in this dataset had covered 110,341 mi.
Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2006 Chrysler Voyager?
Diesel: 67.9% pass rate across 589 tests. Petrol: 76.4% pass rate across 89 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.
Does the season affect the 2006 Chrysler Voyager MOT pass rate?
Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 67.3% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 71.2%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.