2010 Chrysler Voyager MOT pass rate

Only 53 tests of this exact model and year are in the DVSA data, below the 100 we ask for before a page goes in the index. The figures are still shown, because they are the only ones there are.

Pass rate

66.0%

Below average — 8.7 pts behind the 74.7% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 53 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £29–£76

Which year to buy

  • Best 2001 74.6% pass
  • Avoid 2002 63.0% pass

Across the 10 years on record, a spread of 11.6 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
55.0%
Typical mileage
105k mi

The 2010 Chrysler Voyager MOT pass rate is 66.0% of its MOT tests — 8.7 points behind what its age and mileage predict. Brakes is the biggest single reason it fails, at 25.3% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2010 Chrysler Voyager on the real record

66.0% of 2010 Chrysler Voyager MOTs passed — 53 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Check your postcode

MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Chrysler Voyager does in your corner of the country.

How one model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Expert verdict

Fewer problems with tyres

Tyres are 10.1% of this car’s recorded faults, against 19.8% nationally — the mirror image of the usual story on a car of this age.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Chrysler Voyager? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2010 Chrysler Voyager compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 74.7%, so this figure is 8.7 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 55.0%. The median 2010 Chrysler Voyager in this dataset had covered 105,236 mi.

The single most recorded failure item is "Position lamp not working", noted on 11.32% of tests.

  • 53 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 66.0% overall pass rate, 55.0% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Chrysler Voyager, the average is 69.4% — best year 2001 (74.6%), worst 2002 (63.0%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
53
Typical mileage (median)
105,236 mi
Make and model
Chrysler Voyager
Updated
2026-11-05

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Headlight Bulb

Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.

Does mileage affect the Voyager MOT pass rate?

60-90k 83.3%
90-120k 60.0%
120k+ 63.6%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 52% so small gaps stay visible.

What fails a 2010 Voyager

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Brakes 25.3%
+4.4 pts vs national national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Suspension 20.2%
−0.8 pts vs national national 21.0% Price suspension parts
Lamps & electrics 14.6%
+2.4 pts vs national national 12.2% Order bulbs & wipers
Tyres 10.1%
−9.7 pts vs national national 19.8% Compare tyre prices
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Emissions & leaks 8.6%
  • Advisories 7.6%
  • Visibility 6.1%
  • Body & chassis 3.0%
  • Identification 2.5%
  • Steering 1.5%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2010 Chrysler Voyager tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2010 Voyager

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check the lights 11.3% of tests

    “position lamp not working”

    Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.

  2. Check the windscreen 9.4% of tests

    “windscreen damaged”

    Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.

  3. Check the brakes 5.7% of tests

    “brake discs significantly and obviously worn”

    Look through the spokes of each wheel at the pad — less than 3mm of friction material, or a lip on the disc edge, is the usual failure. Check the handbrake holds on a slope with a few clicks, not at the top of its travel.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2010 Voyager through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £29–£76 — and 47% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£29–£76
Cheapest common item: stop lamp not working
£3–£12
Dearest common item: windscreen damaged
£80–£200
Common items a careful owner can do at home
90%
Repairs that still cost under £30
47%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 53 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the Voyager, side by side

10 model years on record, from 2001 to 2010. Across them the pass rate runs from 63.0% to 74.6% — a spread of 11.6 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2001 74.6% windscreen damaged but not…
  2. 2002 63.0% registration plate lamp(s)…
  3. 2003 68.2% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
  4. 2004 70.8% registration plate lamp(s)…
  5. 2005 67.9% registration plate lamp(s)…
  6. 2006 69.0% headlamp lens slightly defective
  7. 2007 68.7% headlamp lens slightly defective
  8. 2008 70.7% registration plate lamp(s)…
  9. 2009 71.3% registration plate lamp(s)…
  10. 2010 66.0%
    position lamp not working

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2010 Chrysler Voyager with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2010 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2010 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2010 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2010 Chrysler Voyager 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 197 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Brakes 50 25.30% 20.89% +4.41
Suspension 40 20.20% 20.98% −0.78
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 29 14.60% 12.21% +2.39
Tyres 20 10.10% 19.76% −9.66
Noise, emissions and leaks 17 8.60% 5.52% +3.08
Non-component advisories 15 7.60% 4.18% +3.42
Visibility 12 6.10% 4.97% +1.13
Body, chassis, structure 6 3.00% 5.57% −2.57
Identification of the vehicle 5 2.50% 1.76% +0.74
Steering 3 1.50% 2.57% −1.07

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 53 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 11.3% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 9.4% £5–20 Number Plate Lamp →
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility Minor 9.4% £80–200 Windscreen →
Brake discs significantly and obviously worn Brakes Major 5.7% £45–110 Brake Discs and Pads Set →
Has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords Tyres Major 5.7% £45–95 Tyres →
Headlamp lens slightly defective Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 5.7% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Rbt (sp) efficiency below requirements Brakes Major 5.7% £45–110 Brake Discs and Pads Set →
Service brake imbalance across an axle Brakes Major 5.7% £45–110 Brake Discs and Pads Set →
Stop lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 5.7% £3–12 Stop Light Bulb →
Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension Minor 3.8% £18–45 Ball Joint →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension Advisory 28.3% £40–150
Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks Advisory 22.6% £200–700
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Advisory 15.1% £45–95
Non-component advisories Passenger seat(s) missing at time of test Non-component advisories Advisory 13.2% £20–80
Service brake performance excessively binding Brakes Advisory 13.2% £60–150
Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes Advisory 11.3% £45–110

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
60-90k 12 83.3% 78,181 mi
90-120k 30 60.0% 105,052 mi
120k+ 11 63.6% 134,264 mi

Source: 53 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2010 Voyager MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2010 Chrysler Voyager?

66.0% of the 53 2010 Chrysler Voyager tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 74.7% for cars first used in 2010. First-attempt pass rate: 55.0%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2010 Chrysler Voyager?

The three most recorded items are position lamp not working (11.32%), registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (9.43%), windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (9.43%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2010 Chrysler Voyager MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 83.3% of the time, falling to 63.6% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2010 Chrysler Voyager in this dataset had covered 105,236 mi.