Pass rate
84.9%
Around average — 12.0 pts ahead of the 72.9% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 53 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £52–£140
2002 Ford motorhome MOT pass rate
- 2002
- Motorhome
- 4 trims combined
- typical 52,037 mi
Only 53 tests of this exact model and year are in the DVSA data, below the 100 we ask for before a page goes in the index. The figures are still shown, because they are the only ones there are.
Most common fault
Brakes
28.4% of faults · 20.9% nationally
mostly worn pads and discs, corroded pipes and a handbrake that will not hold.
Which year to buy
- Best 2021 96.5% pass
- Avoid 2008 77.8% pass
Across the 21 years on record, a spread of 18.7 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 82.6%
- Typical mileage
- 52k mi
The 2002 Ford motorhome MOT pass rate is 84.9% of its MOT tests — 12.0 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. Brakes is the biggest single reason it fails, at 28.4% of what testers record.
Check your postcode
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Ford motorhome does in your corner of the country.
Expert verdict
Brakes: 1.4× the national share
Brakes make up 28.4% of everything recorded on the 2002 Ford Motorhome, against 20.9% nationally — 7.5 points above. Have the discs and pads measured rather than glanced at, and ask whether the handbrake holds on a slope.
- Beats its own age and mileage. Once you allow for how old and how far these motorhomes have been driven, the expected pass rate is 72.9% and this one manages 84.9% — 12.0 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict.
- Based on a small sample. 53 tests back this page. That is enough to publish and to index, not enough to treat the decimal places as precise — read the pattern, not the second digit.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a Ford Motorhome? Get an email when these numbers change .
Every Ford motorhome first registered in 2002 is combined here — 4 trim and body variants in total — so the sample is as large as the DVSA data allows.
How does the 2002 Ford motorhome compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 72.9%, so this figure is 12.0 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 82.6%. The median 2002 Ford motorhome in this dataset had covered 52,037 mi.
The single most recorded failure item is "Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources", noted on 9.43% of tests.
- 53 recorded tests behind this page.
- 84.9% overall pass rate, 82.6% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the Ford motorhome, the average is 92.1% — best year 2021 (96.5%), worst 2008 (77.8%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 53
- Typical mileage (median)
- 52,037 mi
- Make and model
- Ford Motorhome
- Updated
- 2026-11-05
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Number Plate Lamp
Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.
Does mileage affect the Motorhome MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 67% so small gaps stay visible.
What fails a 2002 Motorhome
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2002 Motorhome
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the lights 9.4% of tests
“registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
-
Check the windscreen 7.5% of tests
“windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
-
Check the suspension joints 5.7% of tests
“pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn”
With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2002 Motorhome through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £52–£140 — and 41% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £52–£140
- Cheapest common item: outline marker lamp not working
- £3–£15
- Dearest common item: chassis condition corroded to the extent that…
- £180–£450
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 30%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 41%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 53 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the Motorhome, side by side
21 model years on record, from 2002 to 2022. Across them the pass rate runs from 77.8% to 96.5% — a spread of 18.7 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2002 84.9%registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2003 84.3% windscreen damaged but not…
- 2004 83.3% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2005 78.8% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2006 81.9% service brake imbalance across an…
- 2007 81.9% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2008 77.8% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2009 86.7% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2010 79.0% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
- 2011 81.5% rbt (sp) efficiency below…
- 2012 84.7% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2013 86.7% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2014 89.0% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2015 86.7% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2016 91.0% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2017 93.1% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2018 93.7% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2019 95.6% windscreen damaged but not…
- 2020 95.4% headlamp aim too high
- 2021 96.5% headlamp aim too high
- 2022 95.7% headlamp aim too high
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2002 Ford Motorhome with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2002 motorhomes with a similar record
- Mercedes-Benz Motorhome 78.6%
- Auto Trail Motorhome 76.2%
- Fiat Motorhome 72.7%
- Suzuki Motorhome 72.6%
Closest pass rates among 2002 motorhomes with at least 150 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. Full rankings: best motorhomes and worst motorhomes for MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2002 Ford Motorhome 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 9 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 88 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brakes | 25 | 28.40% | 20.89% | +7.51 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 13 | 14.80% | 12.21% | +2.59 |
| Suspension | 12 | 13.60% | 20.98% | −7.38 |
| Tyres | 10 | 11.40% | 19.76% | −8.36 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 8 | 9.10% | 5.57% | +3.53 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 8 | 9.10% | 5.52% | +3.58 |
| Visibility | 6 | 6.80% | 4.97% | +1.83 |
| Non-component advisories | 3 | 3.40% | 4.18% | −0.78 |
| Steering | 3 | 3.40% | 2.57% | +0.83 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 9.4% | £5–20 |
| Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility | Minor | 7.5% | £80–200 |
| Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | Major | 5.7% | £40–150 |
| Outline marker lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 3.8% | £3–15 |
| Registration plate lamp(s) missing in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 3.8% | £5–20 |
| Rigid brake pipes inadequately clipped or supported Brakes | Minor | 3.8% | £80–180 |
| Brake performance not tested unable to be tested Brakes | Major | 1.9% | £60–150 |
| Chassis condition corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced Body, chassis, structure | Major | 1.9% | £180–450 |
| Chassis condition or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a body mounting Body, chassis, structure | Major | 1.9% | £180–450 |
| Door condition cannot be opened from outside the vehicle Body, chassis, structure | Major | 1.9% | £80–250 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes | Advisory | 17.0% | £80–180 |
| Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | Advisory | 9.4% | £40–150 |
| Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks | Advisory | 7.5% | £200–700 |
| Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres | Advisory | 7.5% | £45–95 |
| Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area is inadequately repaired Suspension | Advisory | 5.7% | £40–150 |
| Non-component advisories Play in steering rack inner joint(s) Non-component advisories | Advisory | 5.7% | £120–300 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30k | 1 | 100.0% | 21,452 mi |
| 30-60k | 26 | 84.6% | 39,727 mi |
| 60-90k | 9 | 88.9% | 73,349 mi |
| 90-120k | 9 | 88.9% | 104,180 mi |
| 120k+ | 8 | 75.0% | 157,451 mi |
Source: 53 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2002 Motorhome MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2002 Ford motorhome?
84.9% of the 53 2002 Ford motorhome tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.9% for cars first used in 2002. First-attempt pass rate: 82.6%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2002 Ford motorhome?
The three most recorded items are registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (9.43%), windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (7.55%), pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn (5.66%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2002 Ford motorhome MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 100.0% of the time, falling to 75.0% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2002 Ford motorhome in this dataset had covered 52,037 mi.