Pass rate
72.2%
Below average — 0.7 pts behind the 72.9% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 374 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £27–£98
2002 Smart Mcc City Cabriolet MOT pass rate
- 2002
- typical 64,729 mi
Most common fault
Lamps & electrics
19.6% of faults · 12.2% nationally
Which year to buy
- Best 2004 74.2% pass
- Avoid 2001 67.6% pass
Across the 7 years on record, a spread of 6.6 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 63.6%
- Typical mileage
- 65k mi
The 2002 Smart Mcc City Cabriolet MOT pass rate is 72.2% of its MOT tests — about what its age and mileage predict. Lamps & electrics is the biggest single reason it fails, at 19.6% of what testers record.
Check your postcode
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Smart Mcc City Cabriolet does in your corner of the country.
Expert verdict
Emissions & leaks: 2.6× the national share
Emissions & leaks make up 14.2% of everything recorded on the 2002 Smart Mcc City Cabriolet, against 5.5% nationally — 8.7 points above. Lamps & electrics are still the single largest share at 19.6%, but at 12.2% nationally that one is ordinary. A smoky diesel or a leaking joint fails on emissions more often than on wear, so ask for a recent emissions printout.
- Based on a small sample. 374 tests back this page. That is enough to publish and to index, not enough to treat the decimal places as precise — read the pattern, not the second digit.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a Smart Mcc City Cabriolet? Get an email when these numbers change .
How does the 2002 Smart Mcc City Cabriolet compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 72.9%, so this figure is 0.7 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 63.6%. The median 2002 Smart Mcc City Cabriolet in this dataset had covered 64,729 mi.
Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 72.7% of the time, April–September 71.8%.
The single most recorded failure item is "Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect", noted on 4.55% of tests.
- 374 recorded tests behind this page.
- 72.2% overall pass rate, 63.6% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the Smart Mcc City Cabriolet, the average is 73.1% — best year 2004 (74.2%), worst 2001 (67.6%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 374
- Typical mileage (median)
- 64,729 mi
- Make and model
- Smart Mcc City Cabriolet
- Updated
- 2026-11-05
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Headlight Alignment
Typically a garage job — get quotes before committing.
Does mileage affect the City Cabriolet MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 61% so small gaps stay visible.
Regional pass rates for the City Cabriolet
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| South East | 128 | 72.7% |
| South West | 56 | 62.5% |
| East of England | 43 | 79.1% |
| North West | 35 | 65.7% |
| West Midlands | 34 | 85.3% |
| East Midlands | 27 | 70.4% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2002 City Cabriolet
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2002 City Cabriolet
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the lights 4.5% of tests
“headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
-
Check the exhaust and emissions 4.3% of tests
“catalyst emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits”
Listen for a blow at idle and have someone rev it gently. Then look at the tailpipe smoke: blue is oil, white when warm is coolant, black is over-fuelling. Any of those and the emissions test is the least of it.
-
Check the suspension joints 3.7% of tests
“pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn”
With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2002 City Cabriolet through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £27–£98 — and 38% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £27–£98
- Cheapest common item: washers provides insufficient washer liquid
- £5–£15
- Dearest common item: catalyst emissions lambda reading after 2nd…
- £60–£250
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 50%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 38%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 374 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the City Cabriolet, side by side
7 model years on record, from 2001 to 2007. Across them the pass rate runs from 67.6% to 74.2% — a spread of 6.6 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2001 67.6% srs malfunction indicator lamp…
- 2002 72.2%headlamp aim projected beam image…
- 2003 73.3% catalyst emissions lambda reading…
- 2004 74.2% headlamp lens slightly defective
- 2005 72.8% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2006 73.5% headlamp aim projected beam image…
- 2007 72.5% windscreen damaged but not…
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2002 Smart Mcc City Cabriolet with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2002 cars with a similar record
- Honda Civic 72.2%
- Mitsubishi Shogun 72.2%
- Ford Fusion 72.2%
- Mercedes-Benz A-Class 72.1%
- Ford Fiesta 72.0%
- Audi Tt 71.9%
Closest pass rates among 2002 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2002 Smart Mcc City Cabriolet 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 930 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 185 | 19.60% | 12.21% | +7.39 |
| Suspension | 182 | 19.20% | 20.98% | −1.78 |
| Brakes | 165 | 17.40% | 20.89% | −3.49 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 134 | 14.20% | 5.52% | +8.68 |
| Tyres | 121 | 12.80% | 19.76% | −6.96 |
| Visibility | 50 | 5.30% | 4.97% | +0.33 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 47 | 5.00% | 5.57% | −0.57 |
| Identification of the vehicle | 18 | 1.90% | 1.76% | +0.14 |
| Non-component advisories | 14 | 1.50% | 4.18% | −2.68 |
| Steering | 14 | 1.50% | 2.57% | −1.07 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 4.5% | £30–80 |
| Catalyst emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits Noise, emissions and leaks | Major | 4.3% | £60–250 |
| Headlamp lens slightly defective Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 4.3% | £5–25 |
| Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | Major | 3.7% | £40–150 |
| Wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility | Major | 2.9% | £8–22 |
| Coil spring fractured or broken Suspension | Major | 2.7% | £25–65 |
| Headlamp aim too low Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 2.7% | £30–80 |
| Washers provides insufficient washer liquid Visibility | Major | 2.7% | £5–15 |
| Washers provides insufficient washer liquid Visibility | Rectified | 2.4% | £5–15 |
| Emissions not tested unable to be completed Noise, emissions and leaks | Major | 2.1% | £60–250 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks | Advisory | 20.6% | £200–700 |
| Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes | Advisory | 16.0% | £80–180 |
| Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres | Advisory | 13.1% | £45–95 |
| Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres | Advisory | 12.3% | £45–95 |
| Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes | Advisory | 9.6% | £45–110 |
| Coil spring corroded so that its cross sectional area is reduced and seriously weakened Suspension | Advisory | 5.9% | £25–65 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30k | 17 | 76.5% | 25,625 mi |
| 30-60k | 119 | 76.5% | 46,288 mi |
| 60-90k | 148 | 70.9% | 70,993 mi |
| 90-120k | 73 | 69.9% | 100,627 mi |
| 120k+ | 13 | 69.2% | 142,905 mi |
Source: 374 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2002 City Cabriolet MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2002 Smart Mcc City Cabriolet?
72.2% of the 374 2002 Smart Mcc City Cabriolet tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.9% for cars first used in 2002. First-attempt pass rate: 63.6%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2002 Smart Mcc City Cabriolet?
The three most recorded items are headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (4.55%), catalyst emissions lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits (4.28%), headlamp lens slightly defective (4.28%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2002 Smart Mcc City Cabriolet MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 76.5% of the time, falling to 69.2% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2002 Smart Mcc City Cabriolet in this dataset had covered 64,729 mi.
Does the season affect the 2002 Smart Mcc City Cabriolet MOT pass rate?
Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 72.7% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 71.8%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.