Pass rate
88.3%
Above average — 15.9 pts ahead of the 72.4% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 332 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £38–£117
2005 Toyota Supra MOT pass rate
- 2005
- typical 103,270 mi
Most common fault
Suspension
20.0% of faults · 21.0% nationally
mostly worn arm bushes, split ball-joint boots and broken coil springs.
Which year to buy
- Best 2015 96.3% pass
- Avoid 2000 86.1% pass
Across the 11 years on record, a spread of 10.2 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 87.0%
- Typical mileage
- 103k mi
The 2005 Toyota Supra MOT pass rate is 88.3% of its MOT tests — 15.9 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. Suspension is the biggest single reason it fails, at 20.0% of what testers record.
Check your postcode
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Toyota Supra does in your corner of the country.
Expert verdict
Emissions & leaks: 2.4× the national share
Emissions & leaks make up 13.4% of everything recorded on the 2005 Toyota Supra, against 5.5% nationally — 7.9 points above. Suspension is still the single largest share at 20.0%, but at 21.0% nationally that one is ordinary. A smoky diesel or a leaking joint fails on emissions more often than on wear, so ask for a recent emissions printout.
- Beats its own age and mileage. Once you allow for how old and how far these cars have been driven, the expected pass rate is 72.4% and this one manages 88.3% — 15.9 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict.
- When it fails, it costs. Only 30% of this model’s typical repairs come in under £30 in parts — the failures here tend to be the kind that need a garage rather than a bulb.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a Toyota Supra? Get an email when these numbers change .
How does the 2005 Toyota Supra compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 72.4%, so this figure is 15.9 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 87.0%. The median 2005 Toyota Supra in this dataset had covered 103,270 mi.
Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 84.3% of the time, April–September 91.6%.
The single most recorded failure item is "Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect", noted on 2.11% of tests.
- 332 recorded tests behind this page.
- 88.3% overall pass rate, 87.0% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the Toyota Supra, the average is 89.0% — best year 2015 (96.3%), worst 2000 (86.1%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 332
- Typical mileage (median)
- 103,270 mi
- Make and model
- Toyota Supra
- Updated
- 2026-11-05
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Headlight Alignment
Typically a garage job — get quotes before committing.
Does mileage affect the Supra MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 77% so small gaps stay visible.
Regional pass rates for the Supra
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| South East | 68 | 92.6% |
| North West | 43 | 86.0% |
| Yorkshire | 41 | 87.8% |
| South West | 37 | 89.2% |
| West Midlands | 32 | 87.5% |
| East of England | 31 | 90.3% |
| Scotland | 23 | 91.3% |
| East Midlands | 23 | 82.6% |
| Wales | 17 | 82.4% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2005 Supra
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2005 Supra
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the lights 2.1% of tests
“headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
-
Check the exhaust and emissions 1.8% of tests
“catalyst emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits”
Listen for a blow at idle and have someone rev it gently. Then look at the tailpipe smoke: blue is oil, white when warm is coolant, black is over-fuelling. Any of those and the emissions test is the least of it.
-
Check the windscreen 1.5% of tests
“windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2005 Supra through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £38–£117 — and 30% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £38–£117
- Cheapest common item: mirrors slightly loose
- £3–£15
- Dearest common item: catalyst emissions lambda reading after 2nd…
- £60–£250
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 50%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 30%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 332 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the Supra, side by side
11 model years on record, from 2000 to 2019. Across them the pass rate runs from 86.1% to 96.3% — a spread of 10.2 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2000 86.1% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2001 89.5% catalyst emissions lambda reading…
- 2002 86.2% catalyst emissions carbon…
- 2003 87.1% windscreen damaged but not…
- 2004 89.6% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2005 88.3%headlamp aim projected beam image…
- 2006 93.4% headlamp lens slightly defective
- 2007 87.8% headlamp lens slightly defective
- 2008 92.8% catalyst emissions carbon…
- 2015 96.3% position lamp incorrect colour
- 2019 92.1% catalyst emissions lambda reading…
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2005 Toyota Supra with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2005 cars with a similar record
- BMW M3 88.1%
- Porsche 911 88.6%
- Honda S2000 87.1%
- Bentley Continental 90.2%
- Mercedes-Benz Sl 86.1%
- Aston Martin DB9 91.3%
Closest pass rates among 2005 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2005 Toyota Supra 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 452 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 91 | 20.00% | 20.98% | −0.98 |
| Brakes | 91 | 20.00% | 20.89% | −0.89 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 61 | 13.40% | 5.52% | +7.88 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 57 | 12.50% | 12.21% | +0.29 |
| Tyres | 51 | 11.20% | 19.76% | −8.56 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 45 | 9.90% | 5.57% | +4.33 |
| Visibility | 25 | 5.50% | 4.97% | +0.53 |
| Steering | 13 | 2.90% | 2.57% | +0.33 |
| Identification of the vehicle | 11 | 2.40% | 1.76% | +0.64 |
| Non-component advisories | 7 | 1.50% | 4.18% | −2.68 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 2.1% | £30–80 |
| Catalyst emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits Noise, emissions and leaks | Major | 1.8% | £60–250 |
| Mirrors slightly loose Visibility | Minor | 1.5% | £3–15 |
| Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 1.5% | £5–20 |
| Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility | Minor | 1.5% | £80–200 |
| Battery(ies) insecure but not likely to fall from carrier Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 1.2% | £60–140 |
| Headlamp lens slightly defective Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 1.2% | £5–25 |
| Service brake performance excessively binding Brakes | Major | 1.2% | £60–150 |
| Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension | Minor | 0.90% | £18–45 |
| Catalyst emissions carbon monoxide content after 2nd fast idle exceeds manufacturer's specified limits Noise, emissions and leaks | Major | 0.90% | £60–250 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks | Advisory | 11.8% | £200–700 |
| Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres | Advisory | 8.4% | £45–95 |
| Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes | Advisory | 6.3% | £45–110 |
| Wheel bearings has excessive play Suspension | Advisory | 4.8% | £20–55 |
| Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres | Advisory | 4.2% | £45–95 |
| Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes | Advisory | 3.9% | £80–180 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30-60k | 22 | 90.9% | 47,084 mi |
| 60-90k | 76 | 89.5% | 79,495 mi |
| 90-120k | 135 | 85.9% | 103,649 mi |
| 120k+ | 97 | 89.7% | 155,017 mi |
Source: 332 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2005 Supra MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2005 Toyota Supra?
88.3% of the 332 2005 Toyota Supra tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.4% for cars first used in 2005. First-attempt pass rate: 87.0%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2005 Toyota Supra?
The three most recorded items are headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect (2.11%), catalyst emissions lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits (1.81%), mirrors slightly loose (1.51%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2005 Toyota Supra MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 90.9% of the time, falling to 89.7% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2005 Toyota Supra in this dataset had covered 103,270 mi.
Does the season affect the 2005 Toyota Supra MOT pass rate?
Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 84.3% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 91.6%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.