2020 Fiat Qubo MOT pass rate

Pass rate

91.1%

Above average — 0.4 pts ahead of the 90.7% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 123 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £33–£80

Which year to buy

  • Best 2020 91.1% pass · this year
  • Avoid 2008 68.1% pass

Across the 13 years on record, a spread of 23 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
90.3%
Typical mileage
20k mi

The 2020 Fiat Qubo MOT pass rate is 91.1% of its MOT tests — about what its age and mileage predict. Tyres is the biggest single reason it fails, at 36.9% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2020 Fiat Qubo on the real record

91.1% of 2020 Fiat Qubo MOTs passed — 123 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Check your postcode

MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Fiat Qubo does in your corner of the country.

How one model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Expert verdict

Tyres: 1.9× the national share

Tyres make up 36.9% of everything recorded on the 2020 Fiat Qubo, against 19.8% nationally — 17.1 points above. Check all four tyres yourself, including the inner shoulders, and look at the date stamp — a tyre can pass on tread and still be six years old.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Fiat Qubo? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2020 Fiat Qubo compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 90.7%, so this figure is 0.4 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 90.3%. The median 2020 Fiat Qubo in this dataset had covered 20,459 mi.

50% of the tests on this vehicle ran on Diesel, which passed 90.3% of the time. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 93.8% of the time, April–September 87.9%.

The single most recorded failure item is "Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view", noted on 3.25% of tests.

  • 123 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 91.1% overall pass rate, 90.3% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Fiat Qubo, the average is 75.6% — best year 2020 (91.1%), worst 2008 (68.1%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
123
Typical mileage (median)
20,459 mi
Make and model
Fiat Qubo
Updated
2026-11-05

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Windscreen

Typically a garage job — get quotes before committing.

Does mileage affect the Qubo MOT pass rate?

0-30k 94.3%
30-60k 81.8%
60-90k 100.0%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 73% so small gaps stay visible.

Fuel type and reliability

Diesel 90.3%
Petrol 91.8%

Pass rate by fuel type. Diesel is the most common here (50% of tests).

Regional pass rates for the Qubo

Region Tests Pass rate
North West 23 91.3%
Yorkshire 19 89.5%
South East 18 88.9%
West Midlands 15 100.0%

Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.

What fails a 2020 Qubo

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Tyres 36.9%
+17.1 pts vs national national 19.8% Compare tyre prices
Brakes 19.0%
−1.9 pts vs national national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Visibility 19.0%
+14.0 pts vs national national 5.0% Order bulbs & wipers
Lamps & electrics 6.0%
−6.2 pts vs national national 12.2% Order bulbs & wipers
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Advisories 6.0%
  • Body & chassis 3.6%
  • Seat belts 3.6%
  • Suspension 2.4%
  • Emissions & leaks 1.2%
  • Steering 1.2%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2020 Fiat Qubo tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2020 Qubo

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check the windscreen 3.3% of tests

    “windscreen damaged”

    Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.

  2. Check the wipers and washers 3.3% of tests

    “wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively”

    Run the wipers with the screen wet: they should clear it in one sweep without smearing or juddering. Top the washer bottle up and check both jets hit the screen.

  3. Check the lights 1.6% of tests

    “headlamp aim too high”

    Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2020 Qubo through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £33–£80 — and 43% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£33–£80
Cheapest common item: wipers does not clear the windscreen…
£8–£22
Dearest common item: windscreen damaged
£80–£200
Common items a careful owner can do at home
80%
Repairs that still cost under £30
43%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 123 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the Qubo, side by side

13 model years on record, from 2008 to 2020. Across them the pass rate runs from 68.1% to 91.1% — a spread of 23 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2008 68.1% registration plate lamp(s)…
  2. 2009 72.1% windscreen damaged but not…
  3. 2010 71.7% coil spring fractured or broken
  4. 2011 75.2% coil spring fractured or broken
  5. 2012 75.1% coil spring fractured or broken
  6. 2013 75.2% coil spring fractured or broken
  7. 2014 76.5% coil spring fractured or broken
  8. 2015 79.7% coil spring fractured or broken
  9. 2016 79.7% coil spring fractured or broken
  10. 2017 83.2% coil spring fractured or broken
  11. 2018 82.9% coil spring fractured or broken
  12. 2019 86.6% coil spring fractured or broken
  13. 2020 91.1%
    windscreen damaged but not…

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2020 Fiat Qubo with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2020 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2020 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2020 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2020 Fiat Qubo 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 83 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Tyres 31 36.90% 19.76% +17.14
Brakes 16 19.00% 20.89% −1.89
Visibility 16 19.00% 4.97% +14.03
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 5 6.00% 12.21% −6.21
Non-component advisories 5 6.00% 4.18% +1.82
Body, chassis, structure 3 3.60% 5.57% −1.97
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 3 3.60% 0.82% +2.78
Suspension 2 2.40% 20.98% −18.58
Noise, emissions and leaks 1 1.20% 5.52% −4.32
Steering 1 1.20% 2.57% −1.37

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 123 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility Minor 3.3% £80–200 Windscreen →
Wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility Rectified 3.3% £8–22 Wiper Blade →
Wipers blade defective Visibility Minor 2.4% £8–22 Wiper Blade →
Wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility Major 2.4% £8–22 Wiper Blade →
Has ply or cords exposed Tyres Major 1.6% £45–95 Tyres →
Headlamp aim too high Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Rectified 1.6% £30–80 Headlight Alignment →
Tyre pressure monitoring system malfunctioning or obviously inoperative Tyres Rectified 1.6% £45–95 Tyres →
Brake fluid contaminated Brakes Major 0.81% £45–110 Brake Discs and Pads Set →
Coil spring fractured or broken Suspension Major 0.81% £25–65 Coil Spring →
Has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords Tyres Major 0.81% £45–95 Tyres →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Advisory 12.2% £45–95
Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres Advisory 6.5% £45–95
Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes Advisory 5.7% £45–110
Brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes Advisory 4.9% £18–45
Non-component advisories Items removed from drivers view prior to test Non-component advisories Advisory 2.4% £20–80
Tread depth tread pattern not visible over the whole tread area when minimum depth required is 1.0mm Tyres Advisory 2.4% £45–95

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
0-30k 87 94.3% 14,460 mi
30-60k 33 81.8% 41,578 mi
60-90k 3 100.0% 73,084 mi

Source: 123 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2020 Qubo MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2020 Fiat Qubo?

91.1% of the 123 2020 Fiat Qubo tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 90.7% for cars first used in 2020. First-attempt pass rate: 90.3%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2020 Fiat Qubo?

The three most recorded items are windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.25%), wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively (3.25%), wipers blade defective (2.44%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2020 Fiat Qubo MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 94.3% of the time, falling to 100.0% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2020 Fiat Qubo in this dataset had covered 20,459 mi.

Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2020 Fiat Qubo?

Diesel: 90.3% pass rate across 62 tests. Petrol: 91.8% pass rate across 61 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.

Does the season affect the 2020 Fiat Qubo MOT pass rate?

Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 93.8% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 87.9%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.