2019 Fiat Qubo MOT pass rate

Pass rate

86.6%

Above average — 2.9 pts behind the 89.5% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 358 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £34–£84

Which year to buy

  • Best 2020 91.1% pass
  • Avoid 2008 68.1% pass

Across the 13 years on record, a spread of 23 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
84.8%
Typical mileage
21k mi

The 2019 Fiat Qubo MOT pass rate is 86.6% of its MOT tests — 2.9 points behind what its age and mileage predict. Tyres is the biggest single reason it fails, at 41.6% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2019 Fiat Qubo on the real record

86.6% of 2019 Fiat Qubo MOTs passed — 358 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Check your postcode

MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Fiat Qubo does in your corner of the country.

How one model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Expert verdict

Tyres: 2.1× the national share

Tyres make up 41.6% of everything recorded on the 2019 Fiat Qubo, against 19.8% nationally — 21.8 points above. Check all four tyres yourself, including the inner shoulders, and look at the date stamp — a tyre can pass on tread and still be six years old.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Fiat Qubo? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2019 Fiat Qubo compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 89.5%, so this figure is 2.9 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 84.8%. The median 2019 Fiat Qubo in this dataset had covered 21,027 mi.

59% of the tests on this vehicle ran on Petrol, which passed 84.4% of the time. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 86.9% of the time, April–September 86.2%.

The single most recorded failure item is "Coil spring fractured or broken", noted on 3.35% of tests.

  • 358 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 86.6% overall pass rate, 84.8% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Fiat Qubo, the average is 75.6% — best year 2020 (91.1%), worst 2008 (68.1%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
358
Typical mileage (median)
21,027 mi
Make and model
Fiat Qubo
Updated
2026-11-05

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Coil Spring

Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.

Does mileage affect the Qubo MOT pass rate?

0-30k 88.1%
30-60k 86.2%
60-90k 69.6%
90-120k 100.0%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 61% so small gaps stay visible.

Fuel type and reliability

Petrol 84.4%
Diesel 89.8%

Pass rate by fuel type. Petrol is the most common here (59% of tests).

Regional pass rates for the Qubo

Region Tests Pass rate
Scotland 54 79.6%
South East 53 86.8%
Wales 51 82.4%
East of England 51 90.2%
East Midlands 34 91.2%
North West 33 87.9%
Yorkshire 25 96.0%
South West 21 85.7%
West Midlands 21 90.5%

Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.

What fails a 2019 Qubo

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Tyres 41.6%
+21.8 pts vs national national 19.8% Compare tyre prices
Brakes 16.7%
−4.2 pts vs national national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Suspension 14.5%
−6.5 pts vs national national 21.0% Price suspension parts
Visibility 13.0%
+8.0 pts vs national national 5.0% Order bulbs & wipers
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Advisories 5.6%
  • Lamps & electrics 3.7%
  • Emissions & leaks 3.3%
  • Steering 0.7%
  • Body & chassis 0.4%
  • Seat belts 0.4%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2019 Fiat Qubo tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2019 Qubo

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check the coil springs 3.4% of tests

    “coil spring fractured or broken”

    Look up inside each wheel arch with a torch, all the way round the spring. A snapped spring usually breaks at the very bottom coil, where a quick glance will not reach.

  2. Check the windscreen 2.8% of tests

    “windscreen damaged”

    Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.

  3. Check the wipers and washers 2.2% of tests

    “wipers blade defective”

    Run the wipers with the screen wet: they should clear it in one sweep without smearing or juddering. Top the washer bottle up and check both jets hit the screen.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2019 Qubo through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £34–£84 — and 29% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£34–£84
Cheapest common item: front fog lamps lens defective
£3–£15
Dearest common item: windscreen damaged
£80–£200
Common items a careful owner can do at home
90%
Repairs that still cost under £30
29%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 358 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the Qubo, side by side

13 model years on record, from 2008 to 2020. Across them the pass rate runs from 68.1% to 91.1% — a spread of 23 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2008 68.1% registration plate lamp(s)…
  2. 2009 72.1% windscreen damaged but not…
  3. 2010 71.7% coil spring fractured or broken
  4. 2011 75.2% coil spring fractured or broken
  5. 2012 75.1% coil spring fractured or broken
  6. 2013 75.2% coil spring fractured or broken
  7. 2014 76.5% coil spring fractured or broken
  8. 2015 79.7% coil spring fractured or broken
  9. 2016 79.7% coil spring fractured or broken
  10. 2017 83.2% coil spring fractured or broken
  11. 2018 82.9% coil spring fractured or broken
  12. 2019 86.6%
    coil spring fractured or broken
  13. 2020 91.1% windscreen damaged but not…

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2019 Fiat Qubo with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2019 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2019 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2019 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2019 Fiat Qubo 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 269 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Tyres 112 41.60% 19.76% +21.84
Brakes 45 16.70% 20.89% −4.19
Suspension 39 14.50% 20.98% −6.48
Visibility 35 13.00% 4.97% +8.03
Non-component advisories 15 5.60% 4.18% +1.42
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 10 3.70% 12.21% −8.51
Noise, emissions and leaks 9 3.30% 5.52% −2.22
Steering 2 0.70% 2.57% −1.87
Body, chassis, structure 1 0.40% 5.57% −5.17
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 1 0.40% 0.82% −0.42

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 358 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Coil spring fractured or broken Suspension Major 3.4% £25–65 Coil Spring →
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility Minor 2.8% £80–200 Windscreen →
Wipers blade defective Visibility Minor 2.2% £8–22 Wiper Blade →
Wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility Major 2.0% £8–22 Wiper Blade →
Shock absorbers has an excessively worn bush Suspension Major 1.7% £30–75 Shock Absorber →
Has ply or cords exposed Tyres Major 1.4% £45–95 Tyres →
Has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords Tyres Major 0.84% £45–95 Tyres →
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Major 0.84% £45–95 Tyres →
Brake discs significantly and obviously worn Brakes Major 0.56% £45–110 Brake Discs and Pads Set →
Front fog lamps lens defective which has no effect on emitted light Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 0.56% £3–15 Bulb →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Advisory 15.6% £45–95
Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres Advisory 8.7% £45–95
Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes Advisory 4.2% £45–110
Brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes Advisory 3.6% £18–45
Brake discs significantly and obviously worn Brakes Advisory 2.0% £45–110
Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks Advisory 1.7% £200–700

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
0-30k 243 88.1% 15,245 mi
30-60k 87 86.2% 40,381 mi
60-90k 23 69.6% 69,393 mi
90-120k 5 100.0% 103,029 mi

Source: 358 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2019 Qubo MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2019 Fiat Qubo?

86.6% of the 358 2019 Fiat Qubo tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 89.5% for cars first used in 2019. First-attempt pass rate: 84.8%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2019 Fiat Qubo?

The three most recorded items are coil spring fractured or broken (3.35%), windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (2.79%), wipers blade defective (2.23%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2019 Fiat Qubo MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 88.1% of the time, falling to 100.0% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2019 Fiat Qubo in this dataset had covered 21,027 mi.

Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2019 Fiat Qubo?

Petrol: 84.4% pass rate across 211 tests. Diesel: 89.8% pass rate across 147 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.

Does the season affect the 2019 Fiat Qubo MOT pass rate?

Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 86.9% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 86.2%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.