MOT PASS RATES

The Ford C-Max 2013 by postcode

89.4% in RM vs 66.9% in AB — a 22.5-point gap for the same model and year

Postcode spread

Where the same car, same year, passes — and where it does not.

Ford C-Max 2013 MOT pass rate by postcode area

The Ford C-Max 2013 MOT pass rate by postcode area runs from 89.4% in RM down to 66.9% in AB — 22.5 points apart for the same model, the same model year and the same test. Below are all 81 postcode areas that tested enough of them to publish.

Best area RM · 89.4% 426 tests
Worst area AB · 66.9% 254 tests
National rate 79.9% all years of this model

What a 22.5-point gap means

Pinned to one model year, this is not a table of old cars: every 2013 Ford C-Max in the data is the same age. Over five annual MOTs the gap between the best and worst area is 1.1 extra failures — about £43–£117 in parts at this model's typical failure cost .

16 of 170 models by how far apart their best and worst postcode area are. Wider: Citroen DS3 (22.8). Narrower: Fiat Panda (22.3).

Rates are for the 2013 model year only, in areas with at least 200 tests of it. Mileage, trim and use are pooled — a city van and a motorway van are one line here. Method. Compare it with the model's full history or this exact year.

Every postcode area, worst first

Area Pass rate vs national Tests
AB 66.9% -13.0 254
KY 70.3% -9.6 323
ML 71.7% -8.2 230
KA 74.8% -5.1 254
HU 75.2% -4.7 499
EH 75.8% -4.1 542
SA 75.9% -4.0 569
BN 76.3% -3.6 742
FY 77.1% -2.8 227
BS 77.4% -2.5 1,105
CW 77.4% -2.5 350
PL 78.0% -1.9 615
BA 78.2% -1.7 403
EX 78.3% -1.6 483
LS 78.4% -1.5 620
SN 78.4% -1.5 431
CF 78.5% -1.4 884
GL 78.5% -1.4 825
WS 78.9% -1.0 383
G 79.0% -0.9 523
CH 79.0% -0.9 576
NP 79.0% -0.9 529
OX 79.2% -0.7 583
PO 79.3% -0.6 758
WA 79.3% -0.6 716
ST 79.3% -0.6 629
YO 79.5% -0.4 550
DL 79.7% -0.2 251
TQ 79.9% 0.0 278
WR 79.9% 0.0 334
MK 80.2% +0.3 490
LA 80.4% +0.5 265
NG 80.4% +0.5 1,331
TS 80.4% +0.5 480
BL 80.6% +0.7 320
CV 80.7% +0.8 694
CA 80.7% +0.8 270
CT 80.8% +0.9 490
BD 81.0% +1.1 315
RH 81.1% +1.2 503
NE 81.2% +1.3 966
BH 81.3% +1.4 445
NN 81.5% +1.6 713
WN 81.6% +1.7 255
DH 81.6% +1.7 239
PR 82.0% +2.1 366
GU 82.1% +2.2 498
LN 82.3% +2.4 356
HP 82.3% +2.4 441
CO 82.3% +2.4 509
WF 82.3% +2.4 589
CB 82.4% +2.5 522
LL 82.6% +2.7 499
NR 82.6% +2.7 947
SY 82.7% +2.8 277
DN 82.7% +2.8 713
ME 83.1% +3.2 614
TN 83.2% +3.3 642
PE 83.2% +3.3 1,076
IP 83.4% +3.5 829
L 83.5% +3.6 1,197
SK 83.5% +3.6 534
DE 83.5% +3.6 789
LE 83.5% +3.6 996
M 83.6% +3.7 726
SO 83.6% +3.7 659
S 83.7% +3.8 1,108
CM 83.8% +3.9 801
SG 83.9% +4.0 440
WV 84.0% +4.1 350
TA 84.1% +4.2 328
RG 84.6% +4.7 684
SS 84.8% +4.9 666
B 85.0% +5.1 1,575
DY 85.3% +5.4 252
DA 85.6% +5.7 292
SL 85.7% +5.8 223
OL 86.3% +6.4 248
BB 86.6% +6.7 269
KT 88.8% +8.9 286
RM 89.4% +9.5 426

“vs national” is against this model's own rate across all years (79.9%), not against the national rate for all cars — a number that would flatter a new model and punish an old one.

What this cannot tell you

For context, this model's best area runs 10 points above its own all-years national rate.

The full table AB area page All Ford C-Max years