Pass rate
72.9%
Below average — 0.9 pts behind the 73.8% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 1,739 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £63–£169
2000 Ford Ranger MOT pass rate
- 2000
- typical 127,759 mi
Check your postcode
Most common fault
Body & chassis
20.4% of faults · 5.6% nationally
Which year to buy
- Best 2023 90.2% pass
- Avoid 2006 69.8% pass
Across the 24 years on record, a spread of 20.4 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 65.8%
- Typical mileage
- 128k mi
The 2000 Ford Ranger MOT pass rate is 72.9% of its MOT tests — about what its age and mileage predict. Body & chassis is the biggest single reason it fails, at 20.4% of what testers record.
Expert verdict
Body & chassis: 3.7× the national share
Body & chassis accounts for 20.4% of everything recorded on the 2000 Ford Ranger, against 5.6% nationally — 14.8 points above. Look underneath for corrosion near the jacking points and suspension mounts; surface rust is normal, flaking metal is not.
- When it fails, it costs. Only 27% of this model’s typical repairs come in under £30 in parts — the failures here tend to be the kind that need a garage rather than a bulb.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a Ford Ranger? Get an email when these numbers change .
How does the 2000 Ford Ranger compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 73.8%, so this figure is 0.9 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 65.8%. The median 2000 Ford Ranger in this dataset had covered 127,759 mi.
The most common fuel recorded here is Diesel — 99% of tests, with a 72.7% pass rate. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 73.8% of the time, April–September 71.7%.
The single most recorded failure item is "Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated", noted on 7.82% of tests.
- 1,739 recorded tests behind this page.
- 72.9% overall pass rate, 65.8% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the Ford Ranger, the average is 80.9% — best year 2023 (90.2%), worst 2006 (69.8%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 1,739
- Typical mileage (median)
- 127,759 mi
- Make and model
- Ford Ranger
- Updated
- 2026-11-07
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Ball Joint
Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.
Does mileage affect the Ranger MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 63% so small gaps stay visible.
Fuel type and reliability
Pass rate by fuel type. Diesel is the most common here (99% of tests).
Where the Ford Ranger is most common
Across all Ranger model years on record (2000–2023): 186,264 Ford Ranger cars tested in a recordable postcode area, across 394,863 tests. Peterborough (PE) has the most, with 4,029 cars tested there. Cars are counted by the postcode area of the MOT station, so this is where they were tested, not necessarily where their owners live.
| # | Postcode area | Cars | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peterborough (PE) | 4,029 | 80.2% |
| 2 | Sheffield (S) | 3,968 | 83.6% |
| 3 | Leicester (LE) | 3,822 | 82.7% |
| 4 | Birmingham (B) | 3,809 | 84.8% |
| 5 | Chelmsford (CM) | 3,522 | 84.4% |
| 6 | Ipswich (IP) | 3,407 | 79.9% |
| 7 | Ashford (TN) | 3,241 | 80.7% |
| 8 | Norwich (NR) | 3,229 | 79.5% |
| 9 | Exeter (EX) | 3,182 | 75.8% |
| 10 | Nottingham (NG) | 3,156 | 81.0% |
| 11 | Reading (RG) | 3,105 | 84.3% |
| 12 | Guildford (GU) | 2,996 | 80.5% |
| 13 | Gloucester (GL) | 2,874 | 77.6% |
| 14 | Doncaster (DN) | 2,760 | 82.2% |
| 15 | Swansea (SA) | 2,754 | 79.3% |
| 16 | Derby (DE) | 2,618 | 83.5% |
| 17 | Northampton (NN) | 2,538 | 80.9% |
| 18 | Shrewsbury (SY) | 2,536 | 80.9% |
| 19 | Cardiff (CF) | 2,516 | 80.3% |
| 20 | Newcastle upon Tyne (NE) | 2,491 | 82.0% |
The twenty areas with the most Ford Ranger cars in the record, sorted by car count — sort the columns for a different question. Cars tested at a station whose postcode area could not be resolved are counted in the model's total but in no area, so the shares add up to slightly under 100% even across every area, and an area's cars are a subset of the model's. Pass rate is blank below 30 tests in an area, where a percentage is noise rather than a finding. How this model's pass rate varies by postcode →
Regional pass rates for the Ranger
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| South East | 455 | 74.1% |
| South West | 438 | 67.1% |
| East of England | 359 | 74.7% |
| West Midlands | 140 | 77.9% |
| East Midlands | 85 | 81.2% |
| Yorkshire | 81 | 74.1% |
| Wales | 71 | 69.0% |
| North West | 64 | 76.6% |
| North East | 26 | 76.9% |
| Scotland | 19 | 63.2% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2000 Ranger
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2000 Ranger
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the suspension joints 7.8% of tests
“ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”
With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.
-
Check the windscreen 7.2% of tests
“windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
-
Check the lights 5.8% of tests
“registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2000 Ranger through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £63–£169 — and 27% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £63–£169
- Cheapest common item: rear fog lamp not working
- £3–£15
- Dearest common item: chassis condition or chassis has excessive…
- £180–£450
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 40%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 27%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 1,739 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the Ranger, side by side
24 model years on record, from 2000 to 2023. Across them the pass rate runs from 69.8% to 90.2% — a spread of 20.4 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2000 72.9%ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2001 72.8% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2002 71.8% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2003 71.9% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2004 70.6% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2005 71.8% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2006 69.8% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2007 72.0% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2008 73.1% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2009 72.7% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2010 72.4% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2011 74.6% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2012 74.3% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2013 77.4% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2014 77.6% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2015 78.2% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2016 81.3% coil spring fractured or broken
- 2017 82.0% coil spring fractured or broken
- 2018 83.0% coil spring fractured or broken
- 2019 84.6% coil spring fractured or broken
- 2020 85.6% coil spring fractured or broken
- 2021 86.9% coil spring fractured or broken
- 2022 87.7% windscreen damaged but not…
- 2023 90.2% headlamp aim too high
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2000 Ford Ranger with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2000 cars with a similar record
- Suzuki Jimny 72.9%
- Volvo V70 72.8%
- Mazda Mx-5 73.2%
- Toyota MR2 73.4%
- Volkswagen Lupo 73.4%
- Audi A4 73.5%
Closest pass rates among 2000 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2000 Ford Ranger 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 6,133 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body, chassis, structure | 1,269 | 20.40% | 5.57% | +14.83 |
| Suspension | 1,193 | 19.20% | 20.98% | −1.78 |
| Brakes | 1,128 | 18.10% | 20.89% | −2.79 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 802 | 12.90% | 12.21% | +0.69 |
| Tyres | 460 | 7.40% | 19.76% | −12.36 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 346 | 5.60% | 5.52% | +0.08 |
| Visibility | 324 | 5.20% | 4.97% | +0.23 |
| Steering | 253 | 4.10% | 2.57% | +1.53 |
| Identification of the vehicle | 221 | 3.60% | 1.76% | +1.84 |
| Non-component advisories | 137 | 2.20% | 4.18% | −1.98 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension | Minor | 7.8% | £18–45 |
| Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility | Minor | 7.2% | £80–200 |
| Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure | Minor | 6.2% | £80–250 |
| Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 5.8% | £5–20 |
| Rear fog lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 4.5% | £3–15 |
| Joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body, chassis, structure | Major | 3.9% | £80–250 |
| Chassis condition or chassis has excessive corrosion, seriously affecting its strength within 30cm of a body mounting Body, chassis, structure | Major | 3.6% | £180–450 |
| Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension | Major | 2.9% | £180–450 |
| Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes | Major | 2.8% | £80–180 |
| Wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility | Major | 2.7% | £8–22 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes | Advisory | 28.0% | £80–180 |
| Chassis condition corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced Body, chassis, structure | Advisory | 14.3% | £180–450 |
| Wheel bearings has excessive play Suspension | Advisory | 12.5% | £20–55 |
| Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres | Advisory | 11.8% | £45–95 |
| Engine oil leaks leaking excessively from engine Noise, emissions and leaks | Advisory | 11.5% | £200–700 |
| Registration plates inscription illegible Identification of the vehicle | Advisory | 11.4% | £20–80 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30k | 21 | 95.2% | 16,695 mi |
| 30-60k | 98 | 74.5% | 46,828 mi |
| 60-90k | 248 | 74.6% | 78,925 mi |
| 90-120k | 367 | 72.8% | 106,797 mi |
| 120k+ | 994 | 71.9% | 160,766 mi |
Source: 1,739 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2000 Ranger MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2000 Ford Ranger?
72.9% of the 1,739 2000 Ford Ranger tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 73.8% for cars first used in 2000. First-attempt pass rate: 65.8%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2000 Ford Ranger?
The three most recorded items are ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (7.82%), windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (7.19%), joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (6.15%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2000 Ford Ranger MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 95.2% of the time, falling to 71.9% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2000 Ford Ranger in this dataset had covered 127,759 mi.
Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2000 Ford Ranger?
Diesel: 72.7% pass rate across 1,727 tests. Petrol: 100.0% pass rate across 12 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.
Does the season affect the 2000 Ford Ranger MOT pass rate?
Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 73.8% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 71.7%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.