MOT PASS RATES

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2016 by postcode

93.7% in UB vs 80.8% in FK — a 12.9-point gap for the same model and year

Postcode spread

Where the same car, same year, passes — and where it does not.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2016 MOT pass rate by postcode area

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque 2016 MOT pass rate by postcode area runs from 93.7% in UB down to 80.8% in FK — 12.9 points apart for the same model, the same model year and the same test. Below are all 111 postcode areas that tested enough of them to publish.

Best area UB · 93.7% 667 tests
Worst area FK · 80.8% 380 tests
National rate 87.0% all years of this model

What a 12.9-point gap means

Pinned to one model year, this is not a table of old cars: every 2016 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque in the data is the same age. Over five annual MOTs the gap between the best and worst area is 0.6 extra failures — about £23–£59 in parts at this model's typical failure cost .

130 of 170 models by how far apart their best and worst postcode area are. Wider: Renault Scenic (13.3). Narrower: Volkswagen Fox (12.8).

Rates are for the 2016 model year only, in areas with at least 200 tests of it. Mileage, trim and use are pooled — a city van and a motorway van are one line here. Method. Compare it with the model's full history or this exact year.

Every postcode area, worst first

Area Pass rate vs national Tests
FK 80.8% -6.2 380
AB 82.1% -4.9 708
DD 82.1% -4.9 324
KY 83.0% -4.0 371
PH 84.1% -2.9 251
NN 84.1% -2.9 1,148
BN 84.3% -2.7 680
G 84.3% -2.7 1,138
ML 84.4% -2.6 384
SR 84.6% -2.4 384
CA 84.8% -2.2 474
PA 84.8% -2.2 310
BH 85.1% -1.9 677
PL 85.2% -1.8 763
KA 85.2% -1.8 420
TQ 85.3% -1.7 334
WA 85.4% -1.6 895
W 85.6% -1.4 305
DL 85.6% -1.4 585
IV 85.7% -1.3 315
LN 85.8% -1.2 507
EX 85.9% -1.1 750
BS 86.1% -0.9 1,124
HD 86.2% -0.8 289
EH 86.2% -0.8 972
PR 86.2% -0.8 829
DY 86.3% -0.7 504
CH 86.4% -0.6 887
CF 86.4% -0.6 1,342
BA 86.5% -0.5 473
CW 86.5% -0.5 710
LS 86.5% -0.5 904
YO 86.6% -0.4 902
WS 86.6% -0.4 597
WD 86.7% -0.3 316
CO 86.7% -0.3 588
PO 86.8% -0.2 1,002
SP 86.9% -0.1 320
SO 86.9% -0.1 742
NE 86.9% -0.1 1,507
DN 87.0% 0.0 1,203
FY 87.2% +0.2 407
NR 87.3% +0.3 1,187
NP 87.3% +0.3 859
ST 87.6% +0.6 1,095
GL 87.8% +0.8 788
TN 87.9% +0.9 967
SK 88.0% +1.0 815
TF 88.0% +1.0 366
DE 88.0% +1.0 1,462
GU 88.1% +1.1 1,016
BR 88.1% +1.1 294
RH 88.2% +1.2 787
CT 88.2% +1.2 457
NG 88.2% +1.2 1,433
SY 88.3% +1.3 579
LL 88.3% +1.3 862
HU 88.3% +1.3 641
BL 88.3% +1.3 806
AL 88.4% +1.4 292
IP 88.4% +1.4 911
CB 88.4% +1.4 387
ME 88.4% +1.4 931
SW 88.5% +1.5 565
SN 88.5% +1.5 652
SA 88.6% +1.6 839
RG 88.7% +1.7 1,255
WV 88.7% +1.7 514
DH 88.8% +1.8 498
WN 88.8% +1.8 418
CM 88.9% +1.9 1,361
HR 88.9% +1.9 289
DA 89.0% +2.0 699
M 89.0% +2.0 1,154
TW 89.0% +2.0 727
TS 89.1% +2.1 868
BD 89.1% +2.1 649
PE 89.1% +2.1 1,796
WF 89.3% +2.3 793
LE 89.3% +2.3 1,477
B 89.3% +2.3 2,223
DT 89.4% +2.4 264
L 89.4% +2.4 758
OX 89.4% +2.4 758
HP 89.5% +2.5 736
WR 89.6% +2.6 422
TR 89.8% +2.8 354
LA 90.0% +3.0 428
S 90.0% +3.0 2,056
SG 90.0% +3.0 500
KT 90.1% +3.1 716
OL 90.2% +3.2 652
NW 90.2% +3.2 591
SL 90.3% +3.3 608
IG 90.3% +3.3 516
MK 90.5% +3.5 925
HA 90.6% +3.6 554
TA 90.7% +3.7 451
CV 90.8% +3.8 1,135
SS 90.8% +3.8 732
LU 91.0% +4.0 553
BB 91.1% +4.1 705
CR 91.1% +4.1 763
HX 91.2% +4.2 250
RM 91.5% +4.5 886
SM 91.9% +4.9 221
E 92.0% +5.0 674
SE 92.5% +5.5 836
EN 93.0% +6.0 603
N 93.5% +6.5 598
UB 93.7% +6.7 667

“vs national” is against this model's own rate across all years (87.0%), not against the national rate for all cars — a number that would flatter a new model and punish an old one.

What this cannot tell you

For context, this model's best area runs 7 points above its own all-years national rate.

The full table FK area page All Land Rover Range Rover Evoque years