MOT PASS RATES

The Ford Fiesta 2016 by postcode

88.9% in IG vs 70.7% in ZE — a 18.1-point gap for the same model and year

Postcode spread

Where the same car, same year, passes — and where it does not.

Ford Fiesta 2016 MOT pass rate by postcode area

The Ford Fiesta 2016 MOT pass rate by postcode area runs from 88.9% in IG down to 70.7% in ZE — 18.1 points apart for the same model, the same model year and the same test. Below are all 118 postcode areas that tested enough of them to publish.

Best area IG · 88.9% 1,449 tests
Worst area ZE · 70.7% 229 tests
National rate 78.4% all years of this model

What a 18.1-point gap means

Pinned to one model year, this is not a table of old cars: every 2016 Ford Fiesta in the data is the same age. Over five annual MOTs the gap between the best and worst area is 0.9 extra failures — about £23–£59 in parts at this model's typical failure cost .

63 of 170 models by how far apart their best and worst postcode area are. Wider: Fiat 500 (18.2). Narrower: Peugeot Expert (18.1).

Rates are for the 2016 model year only, in areas with at least 200 tests of it. Mileage, trim and use are pooled — a city van and a motorway van are one line here. Method. Compare it with the model's full history or this exact year.

Every postcode area, worst first

Area Pass rate vs national Tests
ZE 70.7% -7.7 229
DD 71.9% -6.5 2,249
KY 72.1% -6.3 3,645
AB 72.4% -6.0 5,454
FK 74.0% -4.4 2,269
IV 74.8% -3.6 1,911
EH 74.8% -3.6 6,311
PH 75.2% -3.2 1,397
PA 75.7% -2.7 2,260
G 76.2% -2.2 7,274
HU 76.5% -1.9 3,407
SR 77.1% -1.3 1,190
HG 77.2% -1.2 1,118
HD 77.2% -1.2 1,984
ML 77.2% -1.2 2,656
LS 77.4% -1.0 5,538
TF 77.6% -0.8 1,530
KA 77.7% -0.7 2,864
WD 77.8% -0.6 1,227
LN 78.0% -0.4 2,146
CF 78.1% -0.3 9,377
TR 78.2% -0.2 1,747
ST 78.4% 0.0 5,461
PL 78.4% 0.0 3,359
WN 78.6% +0.2 2,304
FY 78.7% +0.3 1,733
KW 78.7% +0.3 494
CH 78.8% +0.4 3,976
BS 78.8% +0.4 7,570
DL 78.9% +0.5 2,490
NG 78.9% +0.5 8,135
YO 79.1% +0.7 4,360
NN 79.1% +0.7 5,428
NP 79.1% +0.7 4,259
WA 79.4% +1.0 5,862
NE 79.4% +1.0 8,165
BD 79.5% +1.1 2,951
CA 79.6% +1.2 3,350
SP 79.6% +1.2 1,724
DH 79.7% +1.3 2,150
SN 79.7% +1.3 3,169
OX 79.8% +1.4 4,445
BA 79.8% +1.4 2,931
LA 79.9% +1.5 2,341
SA 79.9% +1.5 5,663
BN 80.0% +1.6 4,471
GL 80.1% +1.7 4,971
WS 80.1% +1.7 3,412
BL 80.3% +1.9 2,857
TS 80.3% +1.9 3,689
WF 80.3% +1.9 4,217
SK 80.4% +2.0 4,648
DN 80.4% +2.0 5,314
OL 80.5% +2.1 2,291
PO 80.6% +2.2 5,201
CT 80.7% +2.3 2,767
CW 80.7% +2.3 3,312
HR 81.0% +2.6 1,166
EX 81.0% +2.6 3,052
SY 81.0% +2.6 2,350
SO 81.0% +2.6 4,638
TQ 81.1% +2.7 1,636
PR 81.1% +2.7 3,465
HX 81.2% +2.8 955
LL 81.3% +2.9 3,628
BB 81.3% +2.9 3,726
TD 81.3% +2.9 986
CO 81.4% +3.0 3,969
M 81.4% +3.0 5,046
DE 81.5% +3.1 6,277
GU 81.5% +3.1 4,933
DY 81.6% +3.2 2,905
TA 81.6% +3.2 2,281
S 81.8% +3.4 8,993
WR 82.0% +3.6 2,627
TN 82.1% +3.7 4,990
NW 82.2% +3.8 1,125
HS 82.3% +3.9 231
DG 82.3% +3.9 1,125
L 82.3% +3.9 6,734
MK 82.3% +3.9 3,476
LD 82.4% +4.0 380
CM 82.4% +4.0 7,527
NR 82.4% +4.0 5,768
PE 82.5% +4.1 6,405
IP 82.5% +4.1 4,778
CR 82.6% +4.2 1,691
RH 82.6% +4.2 4,381
CV 82.7% +4.3 7,076
ME 82.7% +4.3 5,251
B 82.8% +4.4 14,146
CB 82.8% +4.4 2,523
LU 82.8% +4.4 1,673
HP 82.9% +4.5 3,398
LE 82.9% +4.5 8,503
W 82.9% +4.5 404
AL 83.2% +4.8 1,679
SM 83.2% +4.8 649
SG 83.3% +4.9 3,333
DT 83.4% +5.0 1,050
BH 83.5% +5.1 2,980
RG 83.7% +5.3 6,010
SW 84.4% +6.0 1,039
BR 84.4% +6.0 1,588
UB 84.5% +6.1 1,543
SS 84.6% +6.2 5,907
WV 84.7% +6.3 2,518
HA 85.0% +6.6 1,349
SE 85.5% +7.1 1,674
DA 85.7% +7.3 2,889
SL 85.7% +7.3 2,223
KT 86.0% +7.6 2,940
TW 86.1% +7.7 1,976
EN 86.5% +8.1 2,103
E 87.1% +8.7 1,494
RM 87.7% +9.3 4,631
N 88.0% +9.6 1,221
IG 88.9% +10.5 1,449

“vs national” is against this model's own rate across all years (78.4%), not against the national rate for all cars — a number that would flatter a new model and punish an old one.

What this cannot tell you

For context, this model's best area runs 11 points above its own all-years national rate.

The full table ZE area page All Ford Fiesta years