Pass rate
81.3%
Around average — 7.3 pts ahead of the 74.0% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 619 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £33–£98
2009 Nissan Cube MOT pass rate
- 2009
- typical 76,311 mi
Check your postcode
Most common fault
Lamps & electrics
19.5% of faults · 12.2% nationally
Which year to buy
- Best 2012 89.6% pass
- Avoid 2002 69.6% pass
Across the 20 years on record, a spread of 20 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 78.2%
- Typical mileage
- 76k mi
The 2009 Nissan Cube MOT pass rate is 81.3% of its MOT tests — 7.3 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. Lamps & electrics is the biggest single reason it fails, at 19.5% of what testers record.
Expert verdict
Lamps & electrics: 1.6× the national share
Lamps & electrics make up 19.5% of everything recorded on the 2009 Nissan Cube, against 12.2% nationally — 7.3 points above. Walk round the car with the lights on before the test: bulbs, indicators and number-plate lamps are the cheapest failures to prevent and among the most common.
- Beats its own age and mileage. Once you allow for how old and how far these cars have been driven, the expected pass rate is 74.0% and this one manages 81.3% — 7.3 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a Nissan Cube? Get an email when these numbers change .
How does the 2009 Nissan Cube compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 74.0%, so this figure is 7.3 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 78.2%. The median 2009 Nissan Cube in this dataset had covered 76,311 mi.
Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 80.4% of the time, April–September 82.3%.
The single most recorded failure item is "Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view", noted on 3.72% of tests.
- 619 recorded tests behind this page.
- 81.3% overall pass rate, 78.2% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the Nissan Cube, the average is 78.5% — best year 2012 (89.6%), worst 2002 (69.6%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 619
- Typical mileage (median)
- 76,311 mi
- Make and model
- Nissan Cube
- Updated
- 2026-11-07
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Windscreen
Typically a garage job — get quotes before committing.
Does mileage affect the Cube MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 60% so small gaps stay visible.
Where the Nissan Cube is most common
Across all Cube model years on record (2002–2021): 4,277 Nissan Cube cars tested in a recordable postcode area, across 10,183 tests. Bristol (BS) has the most, with 167 cars tested there. Cars are counted by the postcode area of the MOT station, so this is where they were tested, not necessarily where their owners live.
| # | Postcode area | Cars | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bristol (BS) | 167 | 75.3% |
| 2 | Basildon (SS) | 159 | 92.4% |
| 3 | Birmingham (B) | 128 | 82.8% |
| 4 | London (N) | 119 | 87.7% |
| 5 | Brighton (BN) | 102 | 72.3% |
| 6 | London (SE) | 92 | 85.2% |
| 7 | Derby (DE) | 88 | 86.9% |
| 8 | London (E) | 83 | 88.2% |
| 9 | Newcastle upon Tyne (NE) | 77 | 77.2% |
| 10 | Sheffield (S) | 74 | 76.0% |
| 11 | Coventry (CV) | 73 | 74.6% |
| 12 | Nottingham (NG) | 72 | 75.3% |
| 13 | Portsmouth (PO) | 71 | 75.8% |
| 14 | Cardiff (CF) | 70 | 72.3% |
| 15 | Swansea (SA) | 64 | 78.6% |
| 16 | Ashford (TN) | 62 | 74.4% |
| 17 | Poole (BH) | 61 | 71.7% |
| 18 | Newport (NP) | 61 | 85.5% |
| 19 | Peterborough (PE) | 60 | 74.2% |
| 20 | Glasgow (G) | 60 | 84.6% |
The twenty areas with the most Nissan Cube cars in the record, sorted by car count — sort the columns for a different question. Cars tested at a station whose postcode area could not be resolved are counted in the model's total but in no area, so the shares add up to slightly under 100% even across every area, and an area's cars are a subset of the model's. Pass rate is blank below 30 tests in an area, where a percentage is noise rather than a finding. How this model's pass rate varies by postcode →
Regional pass rates for the Cube
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| South East | 189 | 82.0% |
| South West | 91 | 73.6% |
| East of England | 68 | 88.2% |
| London | 48 | 87.5% |
| West Midlands | 44 | 79.5% |
| East Midlands | 41 | 82.9% |
| Yorkshire | 35 | 77.1% |
| North West | 34 | 82.4% |
| Scotland | 30 | 76.7% |
| Wales | 20 | 80.0% |
| North East | 19 | 84.2% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2009 Cube
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2009 Cube
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the windscreen 3.7% of tests
“windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
-
Check the lights 2.9% of tests
“headlamp lens slightly defective”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
-
Check the suspension joints 1.8% of tests
“ball joint excessively worn”
With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2009 Cube through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £33–£98 — and 48% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £33–£98
- Cheapest common item: rear fog lamp not working
- £3–£15
- Dearest common item: joints constant velocity boot severely…
- £80–£250
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 60%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 48%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 619 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the Cube, side by side
20 model years on record, from 2002 to 2021. Across them the pass rate runs from 69.6% to 89.6% — a spread of 20 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2002 69.6% windscreen damaged but not…
- 2003 78.2% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2004 77.5% headlamp lens slightly defective
- 2005 82.4% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2006 79.9% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2007 79.5% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2008 81.9% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2009 81.3%windscreen damaged but not…
- 2010 75.0% ball joint excessively worn
- 2011 81.3% windscreen damaged but not…
- 2012 89.6% rear fog lamp missing
- 2013 87.7% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2014 73.2% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2015 73.6% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2016 77.1% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2017 76.3% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2018 82.9% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2019 78.7% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2020 79.5% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2021 79.6% joints constant velocity boot…
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2009 Nissan Cube with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2009 cars with a similar record
- Toyota Hi-Ace 81.3%
- BMW 525 80.9%
- Mercedes-Benz S-Class 80.9%
- BMW X5 80.8%
- BMW X6 81.8%
- Subaru Impreza 80.8%
Closest pass rates among 2009 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2009 Nissan Cube 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 1,030 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 204 | 19.50% | 12.21% | +7.29 |
| Suspension | 184 | 17.60% | 20.98% | −3.38 |
| Brakes | 180 | 17.20% | 20.89% | −3.69 |
| Tyres | 168 | 16.10% | 19.76% | −3.66 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 94 | 9.00% | 5.57% | +3.43 |
| Visibility | 65 | 6.20% | 4.97% | +1.23 |
| Non-component advisories | 62 | 5.90% | 4.18% | +1.72 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 49 | 4.70% | 5.52% | −0.82 |
| Identification of the vehicle | 15 | 1.40% | 1.76% | −0.36 |
| Steering | 9 | 0.90% | 2.57% | −1.67 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility | Minor | 3.7% | £80–200 |
| Headlamp lens slightly defective Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 2.9% | £5–25 |
| Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure | Minor | 2.6% | £80–250 |
| Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 2.6% | £5–25 |
| Ball joint excessively worn Suspension | Major | 1.8% | £18–45 |
| Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | Major | 1.8% | £40–150 |
| Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Rectified | 1.8% | £5–25 |
| Rear fog lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 1.8% | £3–15 |
| Exhaust system has a major leak of exhaust gases Body, chassis, structure | Major | 1.6% | £45–120 |
| Rear fog lamp does not emit a steady red light Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 1.4% | £3–15 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres | Advisory | 11.3% | £45–95 |
| Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes | Advisory | 11.0% | £45–110 |
| Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres | Advisory | 10.7% | £45–95 |
| Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | Advisory | 9.4% | £40–150 |
| Brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes | Advisory | 7.1% | £18–45 |
| Headlamp has a product on the lens so that the light output is severely reduced Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Advisory | 4.2% | £5–25 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30k | 32 | 93.8% | 22,242 mi |
| 30-60k | 155 | 87.7% | 45,223 mi |
| 60-90k | 206 | 84.5% | 74,126 mi |
| 90-120k | 98 | 76.5% | 101,586 mi |
| 120k+ | 128 | 68.8% | 165,245 mi |
Source: 619 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2009 Cube MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2009 Nissan Cube?
81.3% of the 619 2009 Nissan Cube tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 74.0% for cars first used in 2009. First-attempt pass rate: 78.2%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2009 Nissan Cube?
The three most recorded items are windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (3.72%), headlamp lens slightly defective (2.91%), joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (2.58%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2009 Nissan Cube MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 93.8% of the time, falling to 68.8% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2009 Nissan Cube in this dataset had covered 76,311 mi.
Does the season affect the 2009 Nissan Cube MOT pass rate?
Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 80.4% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 82.3%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.