Nissan Navara 2017 MOT pass rate by postcode area
The Nissan Navara 2017 MOT pass rate by postcode area runs from 86.0% in B down to 68.3% in DD — 17.7 points apart for the same model, the same model year and the same test. Below are all 72 postcode areas that tested enough of them to publish.
What a 17.7-point gap means
Pinned to one model year, this is not a table of old cars: every 2017 Nissan Navara in the data is the same age. Over five annual MOTs the gap between the best and worst area is 0.9 extra failures — about £26–£71 in parts at this model's typical failure cost .
70 of 170 models by how far apart their best and worst postcode area are. Wider: Jaguar Xf (17.8). Narrower: Suzuki Motorhome (17.7).
Rates are for the 2017 model year only, in areas with at least 200 tests of it. Mileage, trim and use are pooled — a city van and a motorway van are one line here. Method. Compare it with the model's full history or this exact year.
Every postcode area, worst first
| Area | Pass rate | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| DD | 68.3% | 284 |
| AB | 69.1% | 729 |
| YO | 72.2% | 637 |
| KY | 72.5% | 265 |
| FK | 73.7% | 228 |
| EH | 73.8% | 461 |
| HU | 73.9% | 249 |
| DH | 74.4% | 211 |
| ST | 74.6% | 556 |
| IV | 74.7% | 470 |
| DL | 74.9% | 402 |
| LN | 75.0% | 272 |
| BS | 75.1% | 334 |
| PH | 75.5% | 216 |
| LS | 75.6% | 250 |
| EX | 75.8% | 509 |
| SK | 75.9% | 286 |
| G | 76.1% | 305 |
| NE | 76.9% | 563 |
| BN | 76.9% | 221 |
| SP | 77.2% | 219 |
| PL | 77.3% | 396 |
| LA | 77.3% | 286 |
| GL | 77.3% | 472 |
| LD | 77.8% | 248 |
| BA | 78.0% | 355 |
| RH | 78.5% | 270 |
| CA | 78.6% | 383 |
| PR | 78.6% | 351 |
| CF | 78.8% | 306 |
| NG | 78.8% | 650 |
| WS | 78.8% | 241 |
| ME | 79.0% | 271 |
| NR | 79.0% | 699 |
| BD | 79.0% | 343 |
| DE | 79.1% | 506 |
| IP | 79.3% | 661 |
| TN | 79.6% | 460 |
| GU | 79.6% | 436 |
| WR | 79.7% | 202 |
| PE | 79.9% | 974 |
| NP | 79.9% | 259 |
| TA | 80.2% | 313 |
| NN | 80.3% | 371 |
| S | 80.4% | 622 |
| SN | 80.4% | 301 |
| LL | 80.4% | 511 |
| HR | 80.6% | 315 |
| SY | 80.7% | 772 |
| SO | 80.9% | 298 |
| CO | 81.0% | 331 |
| BH | 81.0% | 290 |
| M | 81.0% | 269 |
| TS | 81.3% | 257 |
| OX | 81.5% | 405 |
| SA | 81.5% | 585 |
| RG | 81.7% | 327 |
| WF | 81.7% | 278 |
| SG | 81.7% | 235 |
| CB | 81.8% | 236 |
| DN | 82.1% | 526 |
| BB | 82.2% | 325 |
| CW | 82.2% | 269 |
| MK | 82.4% | 301 |
| HP | 82.6% | 288 |
| CM | 83.3% | 377 |
| PO | 83.7% | 326 |
| SS | 83.7% | 203 |
| LE | 83.8% | 407 |
| CV | 84.8% | 250 |
| DY | 85.9% | 241 |
| B | 86.0% | 486 |
“vs national” is against this model's own rate across all years (78.1%), not against the national rate for all cars — a number that would flatter a new model and punish an old one.
What this cannot tell you
- Which garage to use. There is no test-station field in the anonymised data, so no station is implicated by any of this — why. The station directory lists what is near you.
- That the area causes it. Cars in some areas do more short trips, see more salt, or have owners who wait for an advisory to become a failure. The test cannot separate those.
- Anything about a single car. These are rates over hundreds or thousands of tests, not a prediction for one vehicle — one car with a bad exhaust is one car with a bad exhaust.
For context, this model's best area runs 8 points above its own all-years national rate.