Pass rate
75.0%
Around average — 2.1 pts ahead of the 72.9% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 68 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £46–£127
2002 Perodua Kenari MOT pass rate
- 2002
- typical 58,022 mi
Only 68 tests of this exact model and year are in the DVSA data, below the 100 we ask for before a page goes in the index. The figures are still shown, because they are the only ones there are.
Most common fault
Suspension
23.2% of faults · 21.0% nationally
mostly worn arm bushes, split ball-joint boots and broken coil springs.
Which year to buy
- Best 2010 81.6% pass
- Avoid 2001 66.2% pass
Across the 10 years on record, a spread of 15.4 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 71.2%
- Typical mileage
- 58k mi
The 2002 Perodua Kenari MOT pass rate is 75.0% of its MOT tests — 2.1 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. Suspension is the biggest single reason it fails, at 23.2% of what testers record.
Check your postcode
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Perodua Kenari does in your corner of the country.
Expert verdict
Body & chassis: 2.5× the national share
Body & chassis accounts for 13.9% of everything recorded on the 2002 Perodua Kenari, against 5.6% nationally — 8.3 points above. Suspension is still the single largest share at 23.2%, but at 21.0% nationally that one is ordinary. Look underneath for corrosion near the jacking points and suspension mounts; surface rust is normal, flaking metal is not.
- When it fails, it costs. Only 22% of this model’s typical repairs come in under £30 in parts — the failures here tend to be the kind that need a garage rather than a bulb.
- Based on a small sample. 68 tests back this page. That is enough to publish and to index, not enough to treat the decimal places as precise — read the pattern, not the second digit.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a Perodua Kenari? Get an email when these numbers change .
How does the 2002 Perodua Kenari compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 72.9%, so this figure is 2.1 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 71.2%. The median 2002 Perodua Kenari in this dataset had covered 58,022 mi.
The single most recorded failure item is "Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated", noted on 14.71% of tests.
- 68 recorded tests behind this page.
- 75.0% overall pass rate, 71.2% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the Perodua Kenari, the average is 75.0% — best year 2010 (81.6%), worst 2001 (66.2%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 68
- Typical mileage (median)
- 58,022 mi
- Make and model
- Perodua Kenari
- Updated
- 2026-11-05
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Ball Joint
Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.
Does mileage affect the Kenari MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 58% so small gaps stay visible.
Regional pass rates for the Kenari
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| South East | 20 | 70.0% |
| South West | 16 | 68.8% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2002 Kenari
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2002 Kenari
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the suspension joints 14.7% of tests
“ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”
With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.
-
Check the lights 11.8% of tests
“registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
-
Check the exhaust and emissions 5.9% of tests
“exhaust system has a major leak of exhaust gases”
Listen for a blow at idle and have someone rev it gently. Then look at the tailpipe smoke: blue is oil, white when warm is coolant, black is over-fuelling. Any of those and the emissions test is the least of it.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2002 Kenari through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £46–£127 — and 22% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £46–£127
- Cheapest common item: registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the…
- £5–£20
- Dearest common item: integral vehicle structure condition corroded…
- £180–£450
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 50%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 22%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 68 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the Kenari, side by side
10 model years on record, from 2001 to 2010. Across them the pass rate runs from 66.2% to 81.6% — a spread of 15.4 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2001 66.2% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2002 75.0%ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2003 72.1% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2004 69.0% component mounting prescribed…
- 2005 78.1% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2006 75.2% malfunction indicator lamp…
- 2007 76.4% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2008 76.5% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2009 79.7% track rod end ball joint dust…
- 2010 81.6% ball joint dust cover severely…
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2002 Perodua Kenari with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2002 cars with a similar record
- Mazda Mx-5 75.2%
- Volvo S60 75.2%
- Toyota RAV4 75.3%
- Land Rover Discovery 75.4%
- BMW X5 74.6%
- Mercedes-Benz Ml 74.6%
Closest pass rates among 2002 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2002 Perodua Kenari 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 234 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 55 | 23.20% | 20.98% | +2.22 |
| Brakes | 47 | 19.80% | 20.89% | −1.09 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 33 | 13.90% | 5.57% | +8.33 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 32 | 13.50% | 12.21% | +1.29 |
| Tyres | 25 | 10.50% | 19.76% | −9.26 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 12 | 5.10% | 5.52% | −0.42 |
| Non-component advisories | 12 | 5.10% | 4.18% | +0.92 |
| Visibility | 8 | 3.40% | 4.97% | −1.57 |
| Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | 6 | 2.50% | 0.82% | +1.68 |
| Steering | 4 | 1.70% | 2.57% | −0.87 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension | Minor | 14.7% | £18–45 |
| Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 11.8% | £5–20 |
| Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure | Minor | 7.3% | £80–250 |
| Service brake imbalance across an axle Brakes | Major | 7.3% | £45–110 |
| Exhaust system has a major leak of exhaust gases Body, chassis, structure | Major | 5.9% | £45–120 |
| Joints constant velocity boot split or insecure, no longer prevents the ingress of dirt Body, chassis, structure | Major | 5.9% | £80–250 |
| Prescribed areas prescribed area strength or continuity significantly reduced Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems | Major | 5.9% | £40–120 |
| Battery(ies) insecure but not likely to fall from carrier Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 4.4% | £60–140 |
| Integral vehicle structure condition corroded to the extent that the rigidity of the assembly is significantly reduced Body, chassis, structure | Major | 4.4% | £180–450 |
| Wipers blade defective Visibility | Minor | 4.4% | £8–22 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres | Advisory | 20.6% | £45–95 |
| Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres | Advisory | 16.2% | £45–95 |
| Brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes | Advisory | 14.7% | £18–45 |
| Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes | Advisory | 14.7% | £80–180 |
| Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension | Advisory | 13.2% | £40–150 |
| Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes | Advisory | 11.8% | £45–110 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30k | 3 | 100.0% | 25,525 mi |
| 30-60k | 34 | 79.4% | 45,636 mi |
| 60-90k | 28 | 67.9% | 73,219 mi |
| 90-120k | 3 | 66.7% | 99,520 mi |
Source: 68 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2002 Kenari MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2002 Perodua Kenari?
75.0% of the 68 2002 Perodua Kenari tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.9% for cars first used in 2002. First-attempt pass rate: 71.2%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2002 Perodua Kenari?
The three most recorded items are ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (14.71%), registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (11.76%), joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (7.35%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2002 Perodua Kenari MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 100.0% of the time, falling to 66.7% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2002 Perodua Kenari in this dataset had covered 58,022 mi.