Calculate my fail sheet

2003 Suzuki Carry MOT pass rate

Check your postcode

Pass rate by postcode →

Pass rate

70.5%

Below average — 2.1 pts behind the 72.6% that cars this age and mileage manage.

Across 2,567 recorded tests.

Typical repair bill £61–£162

Which year to buy

  • Best 2013 92.7% pass
  • Avoid 2000 69.2% pass

Across the 14 years on record, a spread of 23.5 points. See every year →

First-attempt pass
61.3%
Typical mileage
90k mi

The 2003 Suzuki Carry MOT pass rate is 70.5% of its MOT tests — 2.1 points behind what its age and mileage predict. Suspension is the biggest single reason it fails, at 22.5% of what testers record.

MOT PASS RATES

The 2003 Suzuki Carry on the real record

70.5% of 2003 Suzuki Carry MOTs passed — 2,567 tests, 2023–2025

Pass rate

The answer from the DVSA's class-4 MOT records.

Expert verdict

Body & chassis: 2.3× the national share

Body & chassis accounts for 12.7% of everything recorded on the 2003 Suzuki Carry, against 5.6% nationally — 7.1 points above. Suspension is still the single largest share at 22.5%, but at 21.0% nationally that one is ordinary. Look underneath for corrosion near the jacking points and suspension mounts; surface rust is normal, flaking metal is not.

Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out

Watching a Suzuki Carry? Get an email when these numbers change .

How does the 2003 Suzuki Carry compare?

Cars of this age and mileage average 72.6%, so this figure is 2.1 points behind what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 61.3%. The median 2003 Suzuki Carry in this dataset had covered 89,722 mi.

Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 69.6% of the time, April–September 71.7%.

The single most recorded failure item is "Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength", noted on 8.80% of tests.

  • 2,567 recorded tests behind this page.
  • 70.5% overall pass rate, 61.3% on a first attempt.
  • Across every year of the Suzuki Carry, the average is 71.7% — best year 2013 (92.7%), worst 2000 (69.2%).

Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.

This page's data

Tests analysed
2,567
Typical mileage (median)
89,722 mi
Make and model
Suzuki Carry
Updated
2026-11-07

Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.

Top part to budget for

Corrosion Welding Repair

Typically a garage job — get quotes before committing.

Does mileage affect the Carry MOT pass rate?

0-30k 90.3%
30-60k 79.4%
60-90k 71.0%
90-120k 66.8%
120k+ 65.6%

Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 57% so small gaps stay visible.

Where the Suzuki Carry is most common

Across all Carry model years on record (2000–2013): 5,080 Suzuki Carry cars tested in a recordable postcode area, across 13,976 tests. Portsmouth (PO) has the most, with 212 cars tested there. Cars are counted by the postcode area of the MOT station, so this is where they were tested, not necessarily where their owners live.

# Postcode area Cars Share of all Tests Pass rate
1 Portsmouth (PO) 212 4.2% 697 70.2%
2 Brighton (BN) 164 3.2% 558 66.3%
3 Bristol (BS) 146 2.9% 446 64.1%
4 Birmingham (B) 135 2.7% 258 84.9%
5 Exeter (EX) 132 2.6% 403 66.0%
6 Plymouth (PL) 118 2.3% 368 64.9%
7 Poole (BH) 115 2.3% 381 66.4%
8 Newton Abbot (TQ) 94 1.9% 299 63.2%
9 Ashford (TN) 94 1.9% 246 72.8%
10 Norwich (NR) 87 1.7% 250 70.0%
11 Nottingham (NG) 84 1.7% 246 71.1%
12 Southampton (SO) 83 1.6% 234 69.7%
13 Yeovil (BA) 81 1.6% 252 69.0%
14 Sheffield (S) 79 1.6% 238 70.2%
15 Truro (TR) 78 1.5% 258 59.3%
16 Kingston upon Thames (KT) 77 1.5% 190 76.3%
17 Taunton (TA) 76 1.5% 248 68.5%
18 Swansea (SA) 72 1.4% 228 68.4%
19 Leicester (LE) 72 1.4% 188 78.7%
20 Crawley (RH) 71 1.4% 194 75.3%

The twenty areas with the most Suzuki Carry cars in the record, sorted by car count — sort the columns for a different question. Cars tested at a station whose postcode area could not be resolved are counted in the model's total but in no area, so the shares add up to slightly under 100% even across every area, and an area's cars are a subset of the model's. Pass rate is blank below 30 tests in an area, where a percentage is noise rather than a finding. How this model's pass rate varies by postcode →

Regional pass rates for the Carry

Region Tests Pass rate
South East 743 73.4%
South West 562 63.9%
North West 304 68.4%
East of England 202 72.3%
Yorkshire 159 69.2%
West Midlands 147 74.8%
London 134 84.3%
East Midlands 130 72.3%
Wales 121 66.9%
Scotland 36 63.9%
North East 29 75.9%

Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.

What fails a 2003 Carry

Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.

Suspension 22.5%
+1.5 pts vs national national 21.0% Price suspension parts
Brakes 17.9%
−3.0 pts vs national national 20.9% Price brakes parts
Lamps & electrics 13.7%
+1.5 pts vs national national 12.2% Order bulbs & wipers
Body & chassis 12.7%
+7.1 pts vs national national 5.6% Find body panels
Show the other 6 fault categories
  • Tyres 10.7%
  • Emissions & leaks 7.3%
  • Visibility 5.2%
  • Advisories 4.5%
  • Identification 2.4%
  • Seat belts 1.5%

Shares are of every item recorded on 2003 Suzuki Carry tests — a composition, so they add to 100% across all sections, not per test.

A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.

Before your test

Three checks worth doing on a 2003 Carry

These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.

  1. Check corrosion 8.8% of tests

    “component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength”

    Look under the sills, around the jacking points and where the suspension mounts meet the body. Flaking, holed or crumbly metal fails; a brown stain on sound metal does not.

  2. Check the windscreen 5.1% of tests

    “windscreen damaged”

    Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.

  3. Check the suspension joints 5.0% of tests

    “ball joint excessively worn”

    With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.

Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.

What it costs to get a 2003 Carry through its MOT

Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £61–£162 — and 41% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.

Average repair across the 10 common items
£61–£162
Cheapest common item: malfunction indicator lamp inoperative or…
£3–£12
Dearest common item: component mounting prescribed areas…
£180–£450
Common items a careful owner can do at home
60%
Repairs that still cost under £30
41%

Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 2,567 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →

Every year of the Carry, side by side

14 model years on record, from 2000 to 2013. Across them the pass rate runs from 69.2% to 92.7% — a spread of 23.5 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.

  1. 2000 69.2% component mounting prescribed…
  2. 2001 71.7% component mounting prescribed…
  3. 2002 71.0% component mounting prescribed…
  4. 2003 70.5%
    component mounting prescribed…
  5. 2004 71.2% component mounting prescribed…
  6. 2005 71.7% component mounting prescribed…
  7. 2006 73.5% headlamp lens slightly defective
  8. 2007 75.9% rear fog lamp not working
  9. 2008 83.0% joints constant velocity boot…
  10. 2009 82.0% position lamp not working
  11. 2010 92.6% joints constant velocity boot…
  12. 2011 84.3% joints constant velocity boot…
  13. 2012 88.2% ball joint dust cover no longer…
  14. 2013 92.7% rear fog lamp missing

Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.

Compare the 2003 Suzuki Carry with another year

The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.

Compare 2003 with another year →

Compare two different cars instead →

Other 2003 cars with a similar record

Closest pass rates among 2003 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.

The full DVSA record for the 2003 Suzuki Carry 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold

Every inspection category

Shares of the 7,187 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.

Category Items This car Nationally Difference
Suspension 1,647 22.50% 20.98% +1.52
Brakes 1,309 17.90% 20.89% −2.99
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 1,000 13.70% 12.21% +1.49
Body, chassis, structure 928 12.70% 5.57% +7.13
Tyres 785 10.70% 19.76% −9.06
Noise, emissions and leaks 532 7.30% 5.52% +1.78
Visibility 377 5.20% 4.97% +0.23
Non-component advisories 328 4.50% 4.18% +0.32
Identification of the vehicle 172 2.40% 1.76% +0.64
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 109 1.50% 0.82% +0.68

The exact failure items, in the tester's words

Share of the 2,567 tests on this vehicle that recorded each item
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost Part
Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension Major 8.8% £180–450 Corrosion Welding Repair →
Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility Minor 5.1% £80–200 Windscreen →
Ball joint excessively worn Suspension Major 5.0% £18–45 Ball Joint →
Headlamp lens slightly defective Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 4.6% £5–25 Headlight Bulb →
Malfunction indicator lamp inoperative or indicates a malfunction Noise, emissions and leaks Major 3.7% £3–12 Indicator Bulb →
Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Minor 3.2% £5–20 Number Plate Lamp →
Catalyst emissions Lambda reading after 2nd fast idle outside specified limits Noise, emissions and leaks Major 3.0% £60–250 Emissions Repair →
Stop lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment Major 3.0% £3–12 Stop Light Bulb →
Wipers does not clear the windscreen effectively Visibility Major 2.9% £8–22 Wiper Blade →
Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes Major 2.5% £80–180 Brake Pipe →

Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.

What testers noted without failing the car

Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.

Items recorded as advisory on this vehicle
Recorded item Severity Tests Est. cost
Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes Advisory 19.2% £80–180
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres Advisory 16.2% £45–95
Pins and bushes pin or bush excessively worn Suspension Advisory 11.2% £40–150
Component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength Suspension Advisory 8.3% £180–450
Non-component advisories Play in steering rack inner joint(s) Non-component advisories Advisory 8.3% £120–300
Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres Advisory 8.1% £45–95

Pass rate by mileage

Mileage Tests Pass rate Median odometer
0-30k 62 90.3% 21,529 mi
30-60k 442 79.4% 47,525 mi
60-90k 789 71.0% 76,118 mi
90-120k 748 66.8% 102,612 mi
120k+ 523 65.6% 148,244 mi

Source: 2,567 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.

2003 Carry MOT questions

What is the MOT pass rate for a 2003 Suzuki Carry?

70.5% of the 2,567 2003 Suzuki Carry tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.6% for cars first used in 2003. First-attempt pass rate: 61.3%.

What are the most common MOT failures on a 2003 Suzuki Carry?

The three most recorded items are component mounting prescribed areas prescribed area excessively corroded significantly reducing structural strength (8.80%), windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view (5.14%), ball joint excessively worn (4.95%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.

Does mileage affect the 2003 Suzuki Carry MOT pass rate?

Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 90.3% of the time, falling to 65.6% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2003 Suzuki Carry in this dataset had covered 89,722 mi.

Does the season affect the 2003 Suzuki Carry MOT pass rate?

Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 69.6% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 71.7%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.