Pass rate
92.6%
Above average — 17.9 pts ahead of the 74.7% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 81 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £36–£107
2010 Suzuki Carry MOT pass rate
- 2010
- typical 32,634 mi
Only 81 tests of this exact model and year are in the DVSA data, below the 100 we ask for before a page goes in the index. The figures are still shown, because they are the only ones there are.
Most common fault
Lamps & electrics
28.1% of faults · 12.2% nationally
Which year to buy
- Best 2013 92.7% pass
- Avoid 2000 69.2% pass
Across the 14 years on record, a spread of 23.5 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 92.0%
- Typical mileage
- 33k mi
The 2010 Suzuki Carry MOT pass rate is 92.6% of its MOT tests — 17.9 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. Lamps & electrics is the biggest single reason it fails, at 28.1% of what testers record.
Check your postcode
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Suzuki Carry does in your corner of the country.
Expert verdict
Lamps & electrics: 2.3× the national share
Lamps & electrics make up 28.1% of everything recorded on the 2010 Suzuki Carry, against 12.2% nationally — 15.9 points above. Walk round the car with the lights on before the test: bulbs, indicators and number-plate lamps are the cheapest failures to prevent and among the most common.
- Beats its own age and mileage. Once you allow for how old and how far these cars have been driven, the expected pass rate is 74.7% and this one manages 92.6% — 17.9 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict.
- Based on a small sample. 81 tests back this page. That is enough to publish and to index, not enough to treat the decimal places as precise — read the pattern, not the second digit.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a Suzuki Carry? Get an email when these numbers change .
How does the 2010 Suzuki Carry compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 74.7%, so this figure is 17.9 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 92.0%. The median 2010 Suzuki Carry in this dataset had covered 32,634 mi.
Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 96.7% of the time, April–September 90.2%.
The single most recorded failure item is "Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated", noted on 4.94% of tests.
- 81 recorded tests behind this page.
- 92.6% overall pass rate, 92.0% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the Suzuki Carry, the average is 71.7% — best year 2013 (92.7%), worst 2000 (69.2%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 81
- Typical mileage (median)
- 32,634 mi
- Make and model
- Suzuki Carry
- Updated
- 2026-11-05
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Body Panel Repair
Typically a garage job — get quotes before committing.
Does mileage affect the Carry MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 76% so small gaps stay visible.
Regional pass rates for the Carry
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| West Midlands | 24 | 100.0% |
| South West | 17 | 94.1% |
| Scotland | 15 | 80.0% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2010 Carry
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2010 Carry
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the lights 3.7% of tests
“rear fog lamp not working”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
-
Check the wipers and washers 2.5% of tests
“washers not working”
Run the wipers with the screen wet: they should clear it in one sweep without smearing or juddering. Top the washer bottle up and check both jets hit the screen.
-
Check the windscreen 2.5% of tests
“windscreen damaged”
Check the driver’s side of the screen within the swept area for chips and cracks; anything larger than 10mm in the driver’s central view is a fail. Most chips can be resin-repaired for far less than a new screen.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2010 Carry through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £36–£107 — and 47% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £36–£107
- Cheapest common item: rear fog lamp not working
- £3–£15
- Dearest common item: joints constant velocity boot severely…
- £80–£250
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 70%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 47%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 81 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the Carry, side by side
14 model years on record, from 2000 to 2013. Across them the pass rate runs from 69.2% to 92.7% — a spread of 23.5 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2000 69.2% component mounting prescribed…
- 2001 71.7% component mounting prescribed…
- 2002 71.0% component mounting prescribed…
- 2003 70.5% component mounting prescribed…
- 2004 71.2% component mounting prescribed…
- 2005 71.7% component mounting prescribed…
- 2006 73.5% headlamp lens slightly defective
- 2007 75.9% rear fog lamp not working
- 2008 83.0% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2009 82.0% position lamp not working
- 2010 92.6%joints constant velocity boot…
- 2011 84.3% joints constant velocity boot…
- 2012 88.2% ball joint dust cover no longer…
- 2013 92.7% rear fog lamp missing
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2010 Suzuki Carry with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2010 cars with a similar record
- Porsche 911 92.7%
- Porsche Boxster 91.8%
- BMW M3 90.8%
- Nissan 370 Z 86.6%
- Porsche Cayenne 86.5%
- Toyota Estima 85.9%
Closest pass rates among 2010 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2010 Suzuki Carry 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 9 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 57 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 16 | 28.10% | 12.21% | +15.89 |
| Suspension | 7 | 12.30% | 20.98% | −8.68 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 7 | 12.30% | 5.57% | +6.73 |
| Visibility | 7 | 12.30% | 4.97% | +7.33 |
| Brakes | 6 | 10.50% | 20.89% | −10.39 |
| Tyres | 6 | 10.50% | 19.76% | −9.26 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 4 | 7.00% | 5.52% | +1.48 |
| Identification of the vehicle | 3 | 5.30% | 1.76% | +3.54 |
| Steering | 1 | 1.80% | 2.57% | −0.77 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure | Minor | 4.9% | £80–250 |
| Rear fog lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 3.7% | £3–15 |
| Headlamp levelling device inoperative Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Rectified | 2.5% | £5–25 |
| Reversing lamps inoperative Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 2.5% | £3–15 |
| Washers not working Visibility | Major | 2.5% | £5–15 |
| Windscreen damaged but not adversely affecting driver's view Visibility | Minor | 2.5% | £80–200 |
| Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension | Minor | 1.2% | £18–45 |
| Ball joint excessively worn Suspension | Major | 1.2% | £18–45 |
| Battery(ies) insecure and likely to fall from carrier Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Rectified | 1.2% | £60–140 |
| Bumpers insecure Body, chassis, structure | Rectified | 1.2% | £80–250 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ball joint excessively worn Suspension | Advisory | 3.7% | £18–45 |
| Brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes | Advisory | 3.7% | £18–45 |
| Registration plates inscription illegible Identification of the vehicle | Advisory | 3.7% | £20–80 |
| Brake discs in such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes | Advisory | 2.5% | £45–110 |
| Valve stem seriously damaged Tyres | Advisory | 2.5% | £45–95 |
| Ball joint has excessive play Steering | Advisory | 1.2% | £18–45 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30k | 37 | 97.3% | 19,087 mi |
| 30-60k | 26 | 88.5% | 46,020 mi |
| 60-90k | 13 | 84.6% | 67,036 mi |
| 90-120k | 4 | 100.0% | 103,272 mi |
| 120k+ | 1 | 100.0% | 123,088 mi |
Source: 81 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2010 Carry MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2010 Suzuki Carry?
92.6% of the 81 2010 Suzuki Carry tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 74.7% for cars first used in 2010. First-attempt pass rate: 92.0%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2010 Suzuki Carry?
The three most recorded items are joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated (4.94%), rear fog lamp not working (3.70%), headlamp levelling device inoperative (2.47%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2010 Suzuki Carry MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 97.3% of the time, falling to 100.0% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2010 Suzuki Carry in this dataset had covered 32,634 mi.
Does the season affect the 2010 Suzuki Carry MOT pass rate?
Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 96.7% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 90.2%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.