Pass rate
85.9%
Above average — 13.4 pts ahead of the 72.5% that cars this age and mileage manage.
Across 85 recorded tests.
Typical repair bill £17–£50
2006 Toyota Verso MOT pass rate
- 2006
- typical 108,009 mi
Only 85 tests of this exact model and year are in the DVSA data, below the 100 we ask for before a page goes in the index. The figures are still shown, because they are the only ones there are.
Most common fault
Suspension
26.9% of faults · 21.0% nationally
mostly worn arm bushes, split ball-joint boots and broken coil springs.
Which year to buy
- Best 2017 89.3% pass
- Avoid 2010 77.9% pass
Across the 14 years on record, a spread of 11.4 points. See every year →
- First-attempt pass
- 84.0%
- Typical mileage
- 108k mi
The 2006 Toyota Verso MOT pass rate is 85.9% of its MOT tests — 13.4 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. Suspension is the biggest single reason it fails, at 26.9% of what testers record.
Check your postcode
MOT pass rates are national — type your postcode to see how Toyota Verso does in your corner of the country.
Expert verdict
Suspension: 1.3× the national share
Suspension accounts for 26.9% of everything recorded on the 2006 Toyota Verso, against 21.0% nationally — 5.9 points above. Ask for the front and rear suspension to be checked on a ramp before you buy — worn bushes and broken springs are cheap to look at and expensive to discover at test time.
- Beats its own age and mileage. Once you allow for how old and how far these cars have been driven, the expected pass rate is 72.5% and this one manages 85.9% — 13.4 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict.
- Failures here tend to be cheap ones. 58% of the repairs this model fails on cost under £30 in parts. The pass rate matters less than what a bad afternoon at the test centre actually costs you.
Written from this page's own figures: fault shares against the national composition, the like-for-like pass rate, and the priced repair list. How these are worked out
Watching a Toyota Verso? Get an email when these numbers change .
How does the 2006 Toyota Verso compare?
Cars of this age and mileage average 72.5%, so this figure is 13.4 points ahead of what its age and mileage predict. On a first attempt, before any retests, the figure drops to 84.0%. The median 2006 Toyota Verso in this dataset had covered 108,009 mi.
67% of the tests on this vehicle ran on Petrol, which passed 82.5% of the time. Pass rates also shift with the test month: tests recorded October–March passed 83.6% of the time, April–September 90.0%.
The single most recorded failure item is "Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources", noted on 12.94% of tests.
- 85 recorded tests behind this page.
- 85.9% overall pass rate, 84.0% on a first attempt.
- Across every year of the Toyota Verso, the average is 83.0% — best year 2017 (89.3%), worst 2010 (77.9%).
Figures count every completed test on this vehicle-year in the dataset, including retests. See methodology for the exact definition.
This page's data
- Tests analysed
- 85
- Typical mileage (median)
- 108,009 mi
- Make and model
- Toyota Verso
- Updated
- 2026-11-05
Source: DVSA anonymised MOT test data (2023–2025), OGL v3.0.
Top part to budget for
Number Plate Lamp
Usually a DIY or independent-garage job.
Does mileage affect the Verso MOT pass rate?
Pass rate by odometer reading. Bar lengths start at 68% so small gaps stay visible.
Fuel type and reliability
Pass rate by fuel type. Petrol is the most common here (67% of tests).
Regional pass rates for the Verso
| Region | Tests | Pass rate |
|---|---|---|
| South East | 26 | 84.6% |
| East Midlands | 15 | 86.7% |
Regions come from the postcode area recorded at the test station. Areas on region borders are assigned to the region with the majority of their population.
What fails a 2006 Verso
Everything a tester recorded on this vehicle, grouped into the inspection sections that produced it. The notch on each bar is the national share, so you can see at a glance whether this car is unusual or just ordinary.
A test can record several items, so these percentages do not add up to 100%. The exact strings, with prices, are in the full DVSA record at the bottom of this page.
Before your test
Three checks worth doing on a 2006 Verso
These are not generic tips — they are the faults recorded most often on this exact model, rewritten as things you can check yourself. All three take about ten minutes and cost nothing.
-
Check the lights 12.9% of tests
“registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources”
Switch everything on and walk round the car: both headlamps on dip and main, every indicator, both brake lights, reverse, fog and the two number-plate lamps. A bulb is a few pounds and a five-minute job.
-
Check the suspension joints 10.6% of tests
“ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated”
With the car parked on level ground, rock the top of each front wheel in and out while someone watches the suspension arm. Clunks, or rubber boots split and greasy, are what testers record here.
-
Check the battery 2.4% of tests
“battery(ies) insecure”
Check the battery is secure and its terminals are clean and tight — a loose battery is a fail on its own, and a weak one shows up as slow cranking on a cold morning.
Shares are the proportion of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item, so they overlap: one test can record several.
What it costs to get a 2006 Verso through its MOT
Across the 10 items that are recorded most often on this model, the average repair comes to £17–£50 — and 58% of those repairs are parts that cost under £30.
- Average repair across the 10 common items
- £17–£50
- Cheapest common item: stop lamp not working
- £3–£12
- Dearest common item: joints constant velocity boot severely…
- £80–£250
- Common items a careful owner can do at home
- 80%
- Repairs that still cost under £30
- 58%
Estimates from typical UK parts prices, weighted by how often each item appears in 85 MOT tests on this vehicle. They exclude diagnostics, retest fees and garage labour where the part is a DIY fit, and they are not figures from the DVSA dataset. Older and higher-mileage examples cost more than the average. How these estimates are built → · All MOT repair costs → · Cheapest cars to put through a test →
Every year of the Verso, side by side
14 model years on record, from 2005 to 2018. Across them the pass rate runs from 77.9% to 89.3% — a spread of 11.4 points. The bar under each year is the item that failed it most often.
- 2005 80.0% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2006 85.9%registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2007 81.4% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2008 79.9% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2009 79.8% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2010 77.9% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2011 80.5% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2012 80.4% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2013 82.2% registration plate lamp(s)…
- 2014 83.9% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2015 86.3% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2016 86.9% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2017 89.3% ball joint dust cover severely…
- 2018 89.1% ball joint dust cover severely…
Colour is the pass rate on a fixed scale, so a block means the same thing on any model. Each year links to its own page with the full fault breakdown.
Compare the 2006 Toyota Verso with another year
The raw pass rate mostly measures age. The year comparison adds the like-for-like figure, the mileage bands and the repair bill.
Other 2006 cars with a similar record
- Porsche Boxster 85.8%
- Mercedes-Benz Sl 85.4%
- Porsche Cayman 83.8%
- Mercedes-Benz S-Class 83.6%
- Porsche 911 88.6%
- Porsche Cayenne 83.0%
Closest pass rates among 2006 cars with at least 2,000 tests, so a small sample cannot flatter itself into the list. See the full rankings: best and worst MOT pass rates.
The full DVSA record for the 2006 Toyota Verso 10 failure items · 6 advisories · 10 inspection categories · mileage brackets · all of it in the page, none of it above the fold
Every inspection category
Shares of the 236 individual items recorded on this vehicle, and the same share across all cars nationally. A single test can record several items, so a row is not a percentage of tests.
| Category | Items | This car | Nationally | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suspension | 64 | 26.90% | 20.98% | +5.92 |
| Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | 42 | 17.60% | 12.21% | +5.39 |
| Brakes | 36 | 15.10% | 20.89% | −5.79 |
| Tyres | 33 | 13.90% | 19.76% | −5.86 |
| Body, chassis, structure | 25 | 10.50% | 5.57% | +4.93 |
| Noise, emissions and leaks | 12 | 5.00% | 5.52% | −0.52 |
| Identification of the vehicle | 10 | 4.20% | 1.76% | +2.44 |
| Visibility | 6 | 2.50% | 4.97% | −2.47 |
| Non-component advisories | 6 | 2.50% | 4.18% | −1.68 |
| Steering | 2 | 0.80% | 2.57% | −1.77 |
The exact failure items, in the tester's words
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 12.9% | £5–20 |
| Ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated Suspension | Minor | 10.6% | £18–45 |
| Stop lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Rectified | 5.9% | £3–12 |
| Position lamp not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 4.7% | £5–25 |
| Joints constant velocity boot severely deteriorated Body, chassis, structure | Minor | 3.5% | £80–250 |
| Malfunction indicator lamp inoperative or indicates a malfunction Noise, emissions and leaks | Major | 3.5% | £3–12 |
| Ball joint excessively worn Suspension | Major | 2.4% | £18–45 |
| Battery(ies) insecure but not likely to fall from carrier Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 2.4% | £60–140 |
| Headlamp aim projected beam image is obviously incorrect Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Major | 2.4% | £30–80 |
| Headlamp lens slightly defective Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment | Minor | 2.4% | £5–25 |
Severity is as recorded: Major and Dangerous fail the test outright; Minor and Advisory do not. Costs are estimates from typical UK parts prices — see how they are built.
What testers noted without failing the car
Advisories are the early warnings — the same parts a year or two before they fail. Reading them is how you tell a car that has been maintained from one that has been patched.
| Recorded item | Severity | Tests | Est. cost |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres | Advisory | 17.6% | £45–95 |
| Brake pads less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes | Advisory | 11.8% | £18–45 |
| Rigid brake pipes excessively corroded Brakes | Advisory | 11.8% | £80–180 |
| Coil spring corroded so that its cross sectional area is reduced and seriously weakened Suspension | Advisory | 10.6% | £25–65 |
| Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres | Advisory | 10.6% | £45–95 |
| Registration plates inscription illegible Identification of the vehicle | Advisory | 10.6% | £20–80 |
Pass rate by mileage
| Mileage | Tests | Pass rate | Median odometer |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0-30k | 1 | 100.0% | 9,316 mi |
| 30-60k | 3 | 100.0% | 52,285 mi |
| 60-90k | 21 | 76.2% | 74,018 mi |
| 90-120k | 27 | 85.2% | 106,228 mi |
| 120k+ | 33 | 90.9% | 149,944 mi |
Source: 85 recorded tests on this vehicle-year. Every row above is recomputed from the same DVSA extract as the rest of the page — see the methodology.
2006 Verso MOT questions
What is the MOT pass rate for a 2006 Toyota Verso?
85.9% of the 85 2006 Toyota Verso tests in this dataset passed, against a national average of 72.5% for cars first used in 2006. First-attempt pass rate: 84.0%.
What are the most common MOT failures on a 2006 Toyota Verso?
The three most recorded items are registration plate lamp(s) inoperative in the case of multiple lamps or light sources (12.94%), ball joint dust cover severely deteriorated (10.59%), stop lamp not working (5.88%). Percentages are the share of tests on this vehicle that recorded the item.
Does mileage affect the 2006 Toyota Verso MOT pass rate?
Yes. Cars under 30,000 miles passed 100.0% of the time, falling to 90.9% for those over 120,000 miles. The median 2006 Toyota Verso in this dataset had covered 108,009 mi.
Which fuel type is most reliable for a 2006 Toyota Verso?
Petrol: 82.5% pass rate across 57 tests. Diesel: 92.9% pass rate across 28 tests. Shares are of the tests on this vehicle that recorded each fuel type.
Does the season affect the 2006 Toyota Verso MOT pass rate?
Tests recorded in the winter months (October–March) passed 83.6% of the time; summer months (April–September) passed 90.0%. Brakes, tyres and lights are tested harder in bad weather, but the difference is small on most models.